Harbinger
Volunteer Moderator
Does that mean the coordinates you posted earlier need recalculating?
The example I've been working with today (LP 378-541) varies by this amount now that I've taken the 1/32 grid into account:
0.000379, 0.000842, -0.000337
For all intense purposes the coordinates I previously provided should be close enough to those you would get even if taking 1/32 into account.
Although in saying that, I'll go through the places I've navigated previously once I have sufficient time to do so.
EDIT: Actually shouldn't they be close enough that a 1/32 correction can be easily done on them anyway?
My original averaged result for LP 378-541:
(1.187879, 20.719592, 2.343413)
((1.187879+(1/64))*32)=38.512128
truncated to 38
38/32 = 1.1875
((20.719592+(1/64))*32)=663.526944
truncated to 663
663/32 = 20.71875
((2.343413+(1/64))*32)=75.489216
truncated to 75
75/32 = 2.34375
Which gives (1.1875, 20.71875, 2.34375) and is identical to the result I gained in my 1/32 tests and was verified by wolverine2710 earlier.
I'll run my original coordinates through the same routine and post an updated list shortly.
Last edited: