Discussion What is the most efficient way to crowdsource the 3D system coordinates

Athan

Athan
RedWizzard said:
Eyeballing it in the galaxy map, I'd say Core Sys Sector CB-O a6-3 is correct. Core Sys Sector CB-O a6-0 also exists but it is not at the above coordinates, looks like approx. (-13.2, -34.2, 15.5).
Click to expand...
Yeah now I've had chance to check this myself (in fact it was on my last route!) I think the user who reported this error was definitely mistaken.
 

wolverine2710

Tutorial & Guide Writer
wolverine2710
All explorers. Might I suggest installing the beneath tool. Even if you don't want to add entries in it, the tool detects new systems you have visited and uploads them to the authors site. When TGC has support for system names it can be uploaded there - if the author is gonna support TGC . The tool already uses TGC to get the coordinates. This might come later so that we have a list of "systems with no coordinates". It can also be useful for OCR tools. Just my 2 eurocent.

Name: ED:Heatmap / Commanders Log:
Author: filth
Description: ED:Heatmap / Commanders Log:
Website: http://www.010102.de/
Source available: Yes. Open Source license: not specified. Github repository.
Thread: [Tool] Galaxy Player Heatmap
Compatible with Gamma: Yes
Comments: Actively maintained.
 

wolverine2710

Tutorial & Guide Writer
wolverine2710
Athan. Sorry for the delay. You were already on the OP of this thread - not sure I mentioned it. You were NOT on OP of the 3rd party tools thread - corrected.


Added to the OP, section "Route planners"

Name: CMDR Athanasius' Route Planner
Author: Athan
Description: Web based route planner
Website: CMDR Athanasius' Route Planner
Source available: No
Thread: [GENERAL] Route Planner (miggy.org)
Compatible with Gamma: Yes
Comments: Uses the TGC web-api for up to date coordinates.
 

TornSoul

T
Athan said:
From the Gamma 2.00 changelog:

Fix authored stars with names not having their name set
Click to expand...

So I guess some may have changed.
Click to expand...

Some was fixed

The double names have been removed/renamed

Asha -65.78125 -25.5 139.5
Ashe -92.21875 74.21875 116.09375

Dala 24.75 25.90625 -22.0625
Dalat 196.65625 -159.15625 4.71875

Kanu 113.4375 -23.03125 -124.28125
Kanur -22.125 -24.90625 96.96875

Nari -12.09375 170.34375 90.28125
Narim 142.65625 -207.4375 -54.25

Sama -9.71875 -14.34375 94.625
Samas 55.84375 -173.3125 166.59375

Siren 16.125 22.28125 -77.375
Sireo 141.125 12.625 -55.71875

Taka -46.28125 33.96875 -81.625
Takak 127.875 -10.78125 75.625

Gold color was the repeated name

Fixing TGC in a minute
------

Djali (Herculis Sector QD-T B3-4) and Siburuba (Col 285 Sector BG-T b18-4) are however still not searchable/present (probably others we haven't found yet)
 
Last edited:

Athan

Athan
TornSoul said:
Some was fixed

The double names have been removed/renamed

Asha -65.78125 -25.5 139.5
Ashe -92.21875 74.21875 116.09375

Fixing TGC in a minute
Click to expand...

You don't seem to have bumped the updatedate on the fixed ones, thus my tool didn't grab the update (although I might have a bug that would have otherwise prevented that):

Code: 
  systems: [    {
      id: 1375,
      name: "Ashe",
      coord: [
        -92.21875,
        74.21875,
        116.09375
      ],
      cr: 5,
      commandercreate: "FD",
      createdate: "2014-11-25 17:25:11",
      commanderupdate: "FD",
      updatedate: "2014-11-25 17:25:11"
 

Finwen

F
Hi

I am also creating a tool for ED and i guess wolverine has not noticed that yet...

Name: EDDiscovery
Author: Finwen
Description: Log and route planner.
Website: None.
Source available: No
Thread: on FGE forum only so far: http://firstgreatexpedition.org/mybb/showthread.php?tid=1406
Compatible with Gamma: Yes
Comments: Get data from TGC. Future support for submitting data to TGC is planned.

Requires .Net framework 4.0

Click once installer so it will autouppdate with never versions.
 

RedWizzard

RedWizzard
TornSoul said:
Some was fixed

The double names have been removed/renamed

Fixing TGC in a minute
Click to expand...

Fixed in systems.json also.

TornSoul said:
Djali (Herculis Sector QD-T B3-4) and Siburuba (Col 285 Sector BG-T b18-4) are however still not searchable/present (probably others we haven't found yet)
Click to expand...

I found one more today: "Hydrae Sector IW-W b1-0" is called "Crucis Sector ER-V b2-0" in the galaxy map. What is different about this case is that you can search on either name.
 

TornSoul

T
OK I'm thoroughly confused now.

Hydrae Sector IW-W b1-0
Crucis Sector ER-V b2-0

Neither exist in MB's Gamma list - So why are we even talking about them?

Hydrae Sector IW-W b1-0:
Can be searched - Leads to empty space
- ok that's a bit like the testing systems and should be fixed.

Crucis Sector ER-V b2-0:
Can be searched and leads to the correctly named star

Paiphu:
Is in MBs Gamma list
Can be searched and leads to the correct star


I cant make my above findings match with what you guys are saying - What am I missing?

Code: 
Name				MBGammaList	Searchable	GM
Djali				Yes		No		Herculis Sector QD-T B3-4
Siburuba			Yes		No		Col 285 Sector BG-T b18-4
Hydrae Sector IW-W b1-0		No		Yes		(empty space)
Crucis Sector ER-V b2-0		No		Yes		Crucis Sector ER-V b2-0 (seems fine)
 

TornSoul

T
! - Got it :)

But
RedWizzard said:
I found one more today: "Hydrae Sector IW-W b1-0" is called "Crucis Sector ER-V b2-0" in the galaxy map. What is different about this case is that you can search on either name.
Click to expand...
Still doesn't match what I find - Or I'm again missing something?


Code: 
Name				MBGammaList	Searchable	GM				MBGammaList
Djali				Yes		No		Herculis Sector QD-T B3-4	No
Siburuba			Yes		No		Col 285 Sector BG-T b18-4	No
Hydrae Sector IW-W b1-0		No		Yes		(empty space)			N/A
Crucis Sector IW-W b1-1		No		Yes		Paiphu				Yes


Crucis Sector ER-V b2-0		No		Yes		Crucis Sector ER-V b2-0		No (seems fine)

And again - Why is it we are concerned about those not in MB's Gamma List?
Where do those name come from - An earlier list?
 
Last edited:

Athan

Athan
I can only assume someone added them to TGC... possibly assuming earlier Beta systems still existed and hadn't moved? In which case *slap* to them. Also possible that FD had already tweaked something (server side even) that caused the rename, so not any of our's fault.

To be clear, if I report such it's because I found the error in my DB, which is solely sourced from TGC (except when I apply fixes myself by hand, which I will), so it'll always be something that needs fixing in TGC.
 

JesusFreke

J
I was reading through the gamma 2.0 patch notes, and noticed this one

"Fix galaxy map search not finding generated systems with authored names"

It might be related to some of our star name woes - we should take another look at some of these now with gamma 2.0

It also looks like they fixed the issues with not being able to search for "." or accented chars. \o/
 

Andargor

Andargor
Are EDSC and systems.json basically the same data? Is it just a matter of synchronizing the two?

For example, HR 7721 is in EDSC but not in systems.json.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom