First of all: Malthus was "slightly" off with regards to the date, but there is still no doubt that he was right. You cannot have infinite exponential population growth in a system with finite resources. To believe in that you must be "Either an economist or a madman".Ah, but the trick might be that we can find a much less energy-intensive way of flipping bits. Much like Thomas Malthus's notion of when human population became unsustainable has long since been smashed, or that dates of exhausting the world's oil running out have been successively put back by advanced extraction techniques.
I suppose much of science and science fiction is wondering where the hard limits will eventually kick in. But have to say - taking 200 years to travel 30 LY would put quite a crimp in E: D's gameplay. It's not like those pre-FSD colony megaships seem to have come to happy endings.
The "new" oil reserves are large, but the part of them being extractable as in feasible with regards to EROI is smaller than you think. Furthermore extracting them is a flipping mess. Peak oil is still a thing, and in current years we are just about to peak. This can be delayed somewhat due to demand, but since the area beneath the curve represent the total true reserve (not the ressource), delaying the peak will only lead to the downwards slope after the peak becoming steeper. Contrary to Malthus' predictions, the peak oil "debate" will be settled in both our lifetimes, and unless you disregard physics, that's a problem, given that 1/3 of the global energy consumption (TPES) goes to food production and distribution. Roughly 90% of that energy comes from fossil fuels and we still haven't gotten around to finding an alternative, so yes, we're pretty DOOM'ed. The peak theory (by Hubbert) is widely accepted among scientist and it also shows that phosphorus will become sparse in this century, so eat/live while you still can.
With those details out of the way, if you look at the amount of bits being flipped, even today, they still follow Moore's prediction. Of course that can't continue. And yes, the energy spent per flipped bit is falling as well, though not at nearly the same rate, still resulting in the energy demand growing exponentially. Also, it will never be able to go below Landaur's Limit. The calculation showing when we need to convert the Universe into energy to keep Facebook running was not even based on current consumption, but instead it was based on... Landaur's Limit. Not that it matters, because it's the exponential growth in demand that is dominant.
In a game you have a certain amount of artistic freedom, so let's just say that I appreciate my FSD