Seems perfectly fine to "take revenge" for two Galnet posts which popped up out of nowhere in the space of a week.
Why FDev avoids adding anarchies to CG efforts?
- Thread starter Ruurka
- Start date
-
- Tags
- anarchy community goal
![[Diplomacy] Carnegie](https://forums-cdn.zaonce.net/data/avatars/m/123/123809.jpg?1553527149){kind=avatar}
We all know Patty can't keep it in his pants.
Look at that face - that's the face of a man who will boink his son's 20y/o girlfriend and then brag about it
I would be surprised to ever see a CG which would be in favour of an anarchy faction. TBH, that's fine. I doubt FDev ever really thought there would be significant support for anarchies as they're the 'bad guys' (as opposed to all the other bad guys: Edmond Mahon - let's be friends with Sirius; Zachary Hudson- Aspiring dictator and friend of the Club; ALD via Denton Patreus- guns down senators during a parliamentary session...etc.) and I imagine that this sort of CG makes things simple- known lawful versus unknown unlawful is going to be black and white for the majority of players.
Personally I don't think criminal gameplay was meant for anything more than something we dip our toe in for a bit for a bit of a change (based on these usually being the lowest paying out of any activites) so didn't really plan on anyone really caring about anarchy factions on the grand scale of things.
Which comes back to why we support them- what better way to blaze your own trail than go against what you're supposed to do.
Personally I don't think criminal gameplay was meant for anything more than something we dip our toe in for a bit for a bit of a change (based on these usually being the lowest paying out of any activites) so didn't really plan on anyone really caring about anarchy factions on the grand scale of things.
Which comes back to why we support them- what better way to blaze your own trail than go against what you're supposed to do.
Neither can Aisling- ask the anti slavery charity workers.