Why no 3rd person?

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
He clearly says that it would make fighting easier?!

Fair point, so maybe he does want a HUD. But that still makes the HUD the problem not the external view itself, in that sense I suppose we've gotten off topic by arguing about the very concept of an external camera. Let's just call it Frontier style 3rd person and Freelancer style 3rd person for clarity. I favour the former, though I don't honestly care if anyone got the latter I just wouldn't play that way myself.
 
Well if we are talking about "playable" 3p view with hud an such - oh hell no! \o/ I dont know how "easier" it would be but it would feel just super out of place in this game.
 
Last edited:
if they made it a choice to play like that i wouldn't mind but wouldn't play like that, absolutely not, it feels really weird to me [hotas]
 
lol. out of 6 responses you got at this point, only 1 could be (at least remotely) considered hostile ("Because third person view in Elite would be stupid.").

looks like you nailed your nickname! :D

please don't consider this hostile. it isn't. but please stop insulting the intelligence of your potential readers.

*sigh*

I was refering to the entire forum , not just this thread. Based on my short time here, I would say 98% of the users are geniunely trying to be helpful, or at least neutral. Sadly, it's the 2% that stick out. They act elite, believe everything they say is right, typically won't engage in a debate w/o a demeaning overtone, and go out of their way to put someone down. That last part is where your post falls in. Not only did you misread what I wrote. You went completely off-topic trying to belittle me.

Anyway... back OT, I am shocked that this thread has received so much attention! I hope this will encourage the FDev wing to reconsider 3pv...
 
I wanted to chime in on the debate that's on this page...

Fair point, so maybe he does want a HUD. But that still makes the HUD the problem not the external view itself, in that sense I suppose we've gotten off topic by arguing about the very concept of an external camera. Let's just call it Frontier style 3rd person and Freelancer style 3rd person for clarity. I favour the former, though I don't honestly care if anyone got the latter I just wouldn't play that way myself.

I did make this post way back on page 10...

As someone has already stated, if you can make proper use of your sensor. You are able to get the info needed to outmaneuver your opponent. Not to mention, there is a little hologram of your target to the left of the sensor that displays the current direction of the ship.

All the means are there to play the game from 1p with the 3p advantage. The sensor would not be displayed during 3p, of course. That should eliminate a few of these arguments.

I hope that helps you better understand my stance. Bottom line, I want to see my awesome ship, in it's entirety, while I'm flying around. I'm all for a limited/zero heads up display, if it means I can do that.
 
Last edited:
I was refering to the entire forum , not just this thread.
you misread what I wrote.

maybe, but you said it in this thread after just one 'not so friendly', and not commenting anything on several informative responses. i see that more as a miscomunication on your part :)

trying to belittle me.

belitteling what seemed an overreaction, not you. i don't even know you, and i don't belittle people in general :)
and the pun with the nickname ... couldn't resist!

Anyway... back OT, <snip> I hope this will encourage the FDev wing to reconsider 3pv...

as you may already know (no, i didn't read the 30 pages), i don't think you will ever see the classic arcade style external view in elite. the external cam is just for sightseeing, was introduced only after popular demand (it was actually called 'debug cam' back then) and disables navigation on purpose.

I am shocked that this thread has received so much attention!

people is bored at work, and you just pulled a viral. congratulations! :D

look at it this way: could as well be a troll. a quick search would have told you that this is a recurrent topic, and people just don't want this game to go the arcade route, neither do the developers. there's enough games like that around.
 
Last edited:

Robert Maynard

Volunteer Moderator
no, you are a very much a ship

The pilot's head moves about inside the ship as the ship changes direction and turns to focus on different HUD elements - then the pilot can transfer to the SRV.

.... plus the fact that we'll be able to leave the pilot's chair in a later Season.
 
The pilot's head moves about inside the ship as the ship changes direction and turns to focus on different HUD elements - then the pilot can transfer to the SRV.

.... plus the fact that we'll be able to leave the pilot's chair in a later Season.

Well that's because you are a very small ship inside of a bigger ship. Or a very small ship inside of a SRV. It's obvious?!
 

Jex =TE=

Banned
But you can't play GTA with those camera modes, how would you aim, how would you drive your car? They are just cinematic views! The argument isn't about different cameras but about adding a 3rd person mode that allows you to play the whole game in 3rd person, making first person redundant.

PS As long as I am not sure that we are talking about the same things I am going to stop wasting my time creating the list above (even though I have a few thousand games in mind...).

And what would it prove it you provided that list?

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -

I'm going to leave you and your dismissive nature to yourself. In the end you don;t need to convince me, or the others posting in this thread, you have to convince FD, and they aren't commenting. Besides chuckling at the image of a pilot flying by tether.

Because you don't have an argument. I'm not trying to convince FD lol, I'm just taking all the bad arguments here and showing them for what they are - a complete waste of time. As usual, the same bad arguments are then thrown back.

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -

Would you change you opinion then if it could be conclusively demonstrated that no such advantage existed? Let's be clear the vast majority of people I've seen arguing for external views are explicitly talking about vanity camera views rather than the sort of combat chase view with HUD that would be needed to support combat play. Trying to fight from the external view in Frontier Elite 2 for example was an exercise in futility. Far from being a mode that confers an advantage, catching someone with their camera out would leave them at a distinct disadvantage. As someone else pointed out this could easily be put to the test in a beta and indeed if it did end up conferring some advantages then minor tweaks could easily overcome them.

It really isn't a realism debate, nor is a dumbing down type of argument. I'm only about 5 years shy of your gaming experience and I take quite a different view, removing options like external cameras feels more like degrading the series than it does damage the realism.

The advantages of which far far outweigh the negatives.
 

Jex =TE=

Banned
For me when OP said "provide a playable 3rd person perspective", I assume he means "playable" as "can play in that mode", which, in my opinion, can't be done without a minimal HUD.

I'm all for an unplayable external cam. And by unplayable I mean that you can't fight in it.


I can argue, but do we talk of a playable view with a cross hair or no HUD at all ?

In the later case that's an unplayable 3rd person view and I've nothing against it in the game (until crews are available, that's another issue), but I'm pretty sure that's not what this thread was about.

In most of these threads it's always been about view. I would argue further that whether you have a hud or not, it's not easier. I can kick ass in easy mode War Thunder from the cockpit, it provides not much if any advantage if you know how to fly and you definitely don't get a wider field of view, the camera is just further back. Regardless of the OP, I think all my posts in this thread have been pretty consistent with a view only - I'd never fly ED out of the pit and I believe the "advantage" people think they have is entirely made up in their heads though there is one caveat - Track IR.

Do people want to play a game, or do they want to immerse themselves into it.
 
I just hate it when people are saying 3rd person view doesn't belong in Elite Dangerous, like that's a valid argument.
Which, of course, it is not. :)
FDev can implement "a lot" of 3rd person flying, without it ending up being an advantage in battle. [yesnod]
Couldn't rep you again, but absolutely wood if I could!
 

Jex =TE=

Banned
I don't want a playable 3rd person mode. I want external camera views for my own enjoyment of the excellent graphical work they've done. Something usable.

I want to enjoy the paintjobs I bought. I want to take a selfie in the middle of combat.

This, as far as I'm concerned blows everything out the water. If you're selling paintjob for the price they are or those stupid spoilers for eight bloody quid, then you're going to damn well add a camera so you can see what you paid for. This is almost illegal behaviour and also disgusting on FD's part but they just want your money - they're not bothered about providing anything decent about their game which is why each and every update is half a job. PP - half a job. Wing - half a job. Paint job - half a job. Engineers - half a job. CQC - half a job.
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom