I think they chose the Bengal Tiger over Sumatran is that the Bengal tiger has a lot more cool gene mutations.
I think they did it because they were trying to appeal to pop culture rather than realism, and the Bengal tiger as the pop-culture "Indian Tiger" makes more marketable sense. Plus it was the tiger of Zoo Tycoon.I think they chose the Bengal Tiger over Sumatran is that the Bengal tiger has a lot more cool gene mutations.
I agree, I think the Bengal tiger is the prototype of tiger that most people have in mind. Personally, when I was a kid and learning the animals, I just learned Bengal tiger as a compound name, not even knowing that Bengal was a place in the world and that there were other kind of tigers. So I learned the lion, the giraffe, the zebra, the Bengal tiger, the polar bear, the brown bear, the leopard... I don't know why I was taught like that, but I can image I wasn't the only one.I think they did it because they were trying to appeal to pop culture rather than realism, and the Bengal tiger as the pop-culture "Indian Tiger" makes more marketable sense. Plus it was the tiger of Zoo Tycoon.
If they'd included the Sumatran from the start instead of the Bengal, I don't think this discussion would even exist, honestly.
If we have the Sumatran from the start instead of the Bengal, I would be equally opposed to the Bengal being added now as I am to the Sumatran being added now. Indeed, I would actually have preferred we got the Sumatran from the start but, given that we already have the Bengal, another subspecies would be a waste.I think they did it because they were trying to appeal to pop culture rather than realism, and the Bengal tiger as the pop-culture "Indian Tiger" makes more marketable sense. Plus it was the tiger of Zoo Tycoon.
If they'd included the Sumatran from the start instead of the Bengal, I don't think this discussion would even exist, honestly.
Those aren't bengal tigers though, they are the product of a looot of gene mixing, inbreeding and subspecies hybridizing.I think they chose the Bengal Tiger over Sumatran is that the Bengal tiger has a lot more cool gene mutations.
View attachment 357521
View attachment 357522
View attachment 357523
Isnt that actually the reality? Like alot of zoos dont have real pure tigers. A lot of tigers in captivity are from bloodline that have been i captivity for a long time and you cant really tell anymore whats in there.Those aren't bengal tigers though, they are the product of a looot of gene mixing, inbreeding and subspecies hybridizing.
If that was the reason, why don't we then have these variations in the game?I think they chose the Bengal Tiger over Sumatran is that the Bengal tiger has a lot more cool gene mutations.
View attachment 357521
View attachment 357522
View attachment 357523
I don't know. That is just what I think.If that was the reason, why don't we then have these variations in the game?
Yeah... That's what I mean. That's the reality.Isnt that actually the reality? Like alot of zoos dont have real pure tigers. A lot of tigers in captivity are from bloodline that have been i captivity for a long time and you cant really tell anymore whats in there.
Wouldnt surprise me if like 90% of tigers in zoos are hybrids to same degree
Litterally the red deer which we got last year. And tge Dromedary I'm betting would be good for this year.Example?
And we have 5 panthers, and 11 felines.I think I'm going to bump this now. We are after all getting three rhinos.
I've seen you mention this idea around a bunch of different animals. I'm not sure I get what you mean.Even if its nothing more than a different pattern
I've seen you mention this idea around a bunch of different animals. I'm not sure I get what you mean.
Are you suggesting that they add separate subspecies as simple random variants? Because that would just lead to a ridiculously unrealistic mixed habitat. Plus, Sumatran tigers are considerably smaller than either the Bengal or Siberian tiger.
I think I'm going to bump this now. We are after all getting three rhinos.
And when you think of it all those Panthers are more closely related to each other than any of the 3 Rhinos we have. So in a way a Snow Leopard is more of a clone to a Lion than Black Rhino is to White. Putting it out there just for perspective, I wouldn't mind the Sumatran Tiger as an Anniversary Gift.And we have 5 panthers, and 11 felines.
I still do not think and also hope we get a third Tiger. But of course, If it should be for anniversary that is okay. As free animal I Take everything. But if we should ever get another Panthera I think it could be the Asiatic Lion. I know it is only a subpopulation of the current Lion but IRL Zoos often label it as Asiatic Lion. This would be also the Chance to improve the actual Model as it was done with the Bactrian Camel (at least or Looks improved to me). But honestly, I also do not really Wish for an Asiatic Lion. There are so more small Cats which I really wish we would get.And when you think of it all those Panthers are more closely related to each other than any of the 3 Rhinos we have. So in a way a Snow Leopard is more of a clone to a Lion than Black Rhino is to White. Putting it out there just for perspective, I wouldn't mind the Sumatran Tiger as an Anniversary Gift.
True, but the original genes for melanistic white tigers came from the Bengal Tiger subspecie. The Bengal Tiger was the only original white tiger to be found in the wild.Those aren't bengal tigers though, they are the product of a looot of gene mixing, inbreeding and subspecies hybridizing.