I added an edit for TOW to my post because I was searching a reference before...This does not show that either SQ16 or TOW (never mind server meshing obviously or many other exemples) have really existed at all.
Either you work for CIG directly or indirectly and have additional information that you are not sharing, or you just "believe" it much like religious faith
CIGĀ“s funding story is fundamentally based in this kind of misrepresentation and banks on "faith" primarily. If they did it with their own money, I personally would not mind. Their money, their malpractice, and their incompetence. The problem is when they have consciously and deliberately extracted 600+ millions with these misrepresentations, from people that for the most part really did not know better. Some people call that fraud.
Game Discussions Star Citizen Discussion Thread v12
- Thread starter Yaffle
- Start date
-
- Tags
- star citizen
Aye, Theaters Of War was playable for a couple of hours at CitizenCon 2019
Source: https://twitter.com/badnewsbaron/status/1198269176466608128
Just like SATABall was playable at PAX 2015
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoVFYA7i2qs
Source: https://twitter.com/badnewsbaron/status/1198269176466608128
Just like SATABall was playable at PAX 2015
"Four years ago, someone played a buggy prototype that was not good enough to be continued on."
Yes. The question was: can you prove that POW existed and was developped ?
The response is yes.
At the time some leaks of evocati bug report existed but they are hard to find now.
Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/gldc58/theatres_of_war_alpha_train_gameplay_footage/
On the subject of UI's, on of the things I genuinely like is that each manufacturer's HUD feels very different and relay different pertinent information.
In comparison, I consider it a shame that a Hauler uses the same as a Vulture, for example.
In comparison, I consider it a shame that a Hauler uses the same as a Vulture, for example.
Viajero
Volunteer Moderator
No one is challenging that someone is working on something. Pretty sure that around 1000+ devs must be doing something. Hopefully. Or at least trying.
But as CIG has often time demonstrated, telling that they are working on something does not equate to that thing progressing in any meaningful form, and telling they are planning to "release for players soon in the early year" does not mean they actually do that. At all.
Viajero
Volunteer Moderator
Not really sure what you mean. I did not ask for proof of someone working on something. I am also still working on my ship to Pluto, trust me.
I asked for proof of that thing existing. Work in progress or cancelled is not existing, otherwise we would have to arrive to the silly conclusion that all SC and SQ42 promises exist and are delivered.
Last edited:
Of course you don't... by design. Our forum formicidae is the master of the sidestep...
Then why did you call BB a 'major engine' for SC, and a tool which would 'industrialize' content output?
If BB is efficient and works well, why are large swathes of the UI still in Flash 3 years later, according to the CEO? (And why do the devs talk about it being extremely awkward to use in post-mortems?)
But various old features still use Flash apparently. They weren't rectified in the next few patches after 3.10, as you expected.
--
The facts are simple: You have massively oversold some internal tech, and events have proven this to be a silly approach.
That's the true lesson here. Wishing for rapid, meaningful advances in the game, based on CIG hype alone, is daft
I seem to recall people implying CIG shut down the computers for ToW because everyone was queuing to play that instead of going the main hall to listen to someone like Tony Zzzzz blather on about some random rubbish.
Some Star Citizen content creator comedy news
Source: https://twitter.com/Morphologis/status/1703013769075700157
Source: https://twitter.com/Morphologis/status/1703013769075700157
And let's remember Lumberyard doesn't come with Scaleform. Why are there still flash elements in UI years after the engine switch ?!Then why did you call BB a 'major engine' for SC, and a tool which would 'industrialize' content output?
If BB is efficient and works well, why are large swathes of the UI still in Flash 3 years later, according to the CEO? (And why do the devs talk about it being extremely awkward to use in post-mortems?)
But various old features still use Flash apparently. They weren't rectified in the next few patches after 3.10, as you expected.
--
The facts are simple: You have massively oversold some internal tech, and events have proven this to be a silly approach.
That's the true lesson here. Wishing for rapid, meaningful advances in the game, based on CIG hype alone, is daft
Last edited:
The gods of LOL have awaken.
Viajero
Volunteer Moderator
It can not really be āadvanced enoughā if it is so bare bones or so broken that it needs to be cancelled or postponed until further notice. I mean, how not advanced at all those things shown as exemple (among many others) must have been, that CIG decided to not release them in any form, not even in the existing early access. Given how broken the PU is that must have been really something! Far from "advance enough" at any rate. They do not exist.
Last edited:
Viajero
Volunteer Moderator
I mean, if he is working for them, more power to him. The thing is probably as solid as SCĀ“s TOW on a bad funding day, but if he is getting legit money out of that deal, good for him.