Game Discussions Star Citizen Discussion Thread v12

Oh it's simple bud.

You've talked up a basic UI tool into some form of Jesus tech on the brink of a major rollout. And 3 years later barely any of the areas you talked about have been touched by its blessed hand. Let alone been transformed into sweet sweet wine.
Where have you seen it's not used ?
The actual mobiglass had every new parts (niknax, reputation, trader, delphi), made with BB. Almost every useable screens (calling ships, refinery, cargo, mission screens, etc), every button/command in ships, every button in elevator is made with BB since its release. I don't know the actual status for huds but they must be managed by BB also. CIG has not redone fully mobiglass in SC but we know they do it for SQ42. They needed the 3D component for BB and the new starmap (critical feature and not basic at all).We will get the fully redone mobiglass when ready.
 

Attachments

  • anyone-one-else-have-this-issue-every-time-i-log-into-the-v0-es6btnt7fpoa1.png
    anyone-one-else-have-this-issue-every-time-i-log-into-the-v0-es6btnt7fpoa1.png
    1.5 MB · Views: 59
Last edited:
Oh it's simple bud.

You've talked up a basic UI tool into some form of Jesus tech on the brink of a major rollout. And 3 years later barely any of the areas you talked about have been touched by its blessed hand. Let alone been transformed into sweet sweet wine.

Maybe it would help if I quoted the great man himself from the video above?





It's super obviously a not-particularly-amazing internal tool, for a not-particulary sexy area of game dev, which they've subsequently struggled to roll out. Not a 'major engine'. Or a catalyst for content 'industrialization'. Or any of the other curious stuff you've said about this most lowly of things...
Do not look at the Fat Man waving his hands behind the curtain!
 

Viajero

Volunteer Moderator
Because devs and reports told us.

You mean in the same way devs and reports told us that SQ42 was to be released in 2016?

Source: https://youtu.be/i-CZrmCtqdk?t=1063

Or perhaps you mean like devs and reports told us that TOW was imminent back in 2019?

Source: https://youtu.be/Xr3PATgOEmo?list=PLVct2QDhDrB0atMb1EAyYgggX5DyfUzd4&t=1889

Or you meant like devs and reports told us server meshing was coming in 2018?

Source: https://youtu.be/bU13Ko8qGyc?t=279

I mean, the list goes on...
 
Last edited:
LOL, modders already delivered vast improvements to SF's UI. Meanwhile, mobiGlas and that Starmap refactor.
Yes mobiglass and Starmap refactor. They are not good now, you want to keep them as is ?

Good job also from the SF modders community because, as you said, the SF's UI is also not good.
 
You mean in the same way devs and reports told us that SQ42 was to be released in 2016?

Source: https://youtu.be/i-CZrmCtqdk?t=1063
As said before, this version of SQ42 certainly has existed but was too bad and restarted.

Or perhaps you mean like devs and reports told us that TOW was imminent back in 2019?

Source: https://youtu.be/Xr3PATgOEmo?list=PLVct2QDhDrB0atMb1EAyYgggX5DyfUzd4&t=1889
ToW existed also but was not good enough to be released.

The mobiglass is only an UI thing and is redone with BB which is efficient and works pretty well in SC. Every new components of mobiglass announced before was added as expected. There is no real risk or difficulty redoing the mobiglass, only a lot of work and design reflection...
 

Viajero

Volunteer Moderator
I have none.

Some evocati leaks.

This does not show that either SQ16 or TOW (never mind server meshing obviously or many other exemples) have really existed at all.

Either you work for CIG directly or indirectly and have additional information that you are not sharing, or you just "believe" it much like religious faith 🤷‍♂️
CIG´s funding story is fundamentally based in this kind of misrepresentation and banks on "faith" primarily. If they did it with their own money, I personally would not mind. Their money, their malpractice, and their incompetence. The problem is when they have consciously and deliberately extracted 600+ millions with these misrepresentations, from people that for the most part really did not know better. Some people call that fraud.
 
Last edited:
This does not show that either SQ16 or TOW (never mind server meshing obviously or many other exemples) have really existed at all.
 
Back
Top Bottom