My point of view, simply put, is this:
1. Let me emphasize it again. The reason I'm lukewarm on the livestock DLC is because they weren't that important until the lack of representative species in many areas. As I've always said before, I don't think livestock DLC is a good choice until areas lacking representative species get supplements.
2. My opinion on domestic animals is really not about whether I like them or not. I think that when humans adapt to nature and want to obtain better living conditions, domesticating animals is doomed. Just like we need to supplement protein to live, for most people, animal protein is the best solution. Because we don’t have enough money like many celebrities, we can hire a nutritionist to customize a recipe that can completely avoid animal foods, but still get enough protein. The essence of human beings in domesticating animals is actually for themselves. This is undisputed. Therefore, the most fundamental purpose of all domesticated animals is to serve humans. We are currently passing legislation and publicity to let people know that these animals have contributed to us and they deserve better treatment, etc., which is good. But from a "fundamental" perspective, domestic animals were born on this planet because of human needs. Whether we like it or not, this is a doomed thing, just like we know that fossil fuels will pollute the environment, but until something better replaces it, we often have to choose it. It’s not that we like it or not, but that’s the only way we can do it. To be honest, many things are really not like or dislike.
3. Regarding livestock, what I want to say is that the many types of livestock we have today are actually basically human needs, not natural selection. In other words, without human intervention, many domestic animals would not exist. For example, in this process, in order to continue the characteristics of some domestic animals that are more beneficial to humans, we often choose inbreeding. Just like the head-to-body ratio of wild boars is hugely different from that of any breed of domestic pigs. All of this is man-made. In nature, inbreeding is avoided by most animals unless the species is at risk of extinction. The same is true in the conservation process of zoos. Major zoo organizations ensure their genetic diversity as much as possible through species coordination. For example, in the past, many zoos would choose inbreeding for some traits that people liked, such as white tigers. But this kind of behavior is classified as "unwelcome behavior" by many organizations today and is strongly avoided. This is where progress lies. Judging from this example, the conservation work of animals in zoos is essentially different from the artificial selection of domestic animals.
4. Please let me emphasize it again. The reason why I am lukewarm about having livestock packs is because there is still a lack of representation in many areas where the priority is higher than livestock.