I wouldn't really care about the animals in the slightest unless we include waterfowl but instead I would be excited about the possible scenery pieces, making lively urban areas like plazas, zoo entrances and parking areas proves to be a challenge at the cost of very high piece count.
Winter 2023 DLC Speculation
- Thread starter Leaf Productions
- Start date
I don't think you're very "chill", honestly mate.
I repeated consantly when it was a joke around June, and now I repeated it since months.
I would ask for forgiveness if I had said something really bad, I think saying sorry is really good, but not really in this case. If my opinion about the pack really affects you so much, why do you keep answering me? I insist, I don't like problems, but this seems too childish to me.
Just don't answer my comments if you don't like them, is as simple as that
Ah, forgot about the Opossum! Would round out the trash trio. Would love to see it!!!
Oh I forgot one of my opinions!
All animals kept in zoos somewhere in the world could add value to the game! With the only two exceptions being animals that are almost indistinguishable to animals already in game! I mean I'd like a New Guinea Singing Dog but it kind of falls into that dingo category.
I DON'T want a famous animal from that golden compass series at all... I mean polar bear and stuff already in game is cool. Especially since the bear is known outside of that series.
All animals kept in zoos somewhere in the world could add value to the game! With the only two exceptions being animals that are almost indistinguishable to animals already in game! I mean I'd like a New Guinea Singing Dog but it kind of falls into that dingo category.
I DON'T want a famous animal from that golden compass series at all... I mean polar bear and stuff already in game is cool. Especially since the bear is known outside of that series.
That's a funny way to spell gray fox
Yes, please. Please
- We need more reptiles
- We need more birds
- We need more monkeys
I agree. My only complaint was that it wasn't more diverse, but in the long run the pack itself is good
Depends. Scenery packs tend to have the more unique animals while animal packs are more samey and add more
What's funny is I've never seen the Sumatran, only the Malayan
Yes. The pack didn't add the deep diving, that was the update. The aquatic pack just had 4 animals and the scenery. Although the scenery is useful
I know!Australia is an alien planet, it doesn't count
Better than the early Calvin and Hobbes Tyrannosaurus comic strips (although Bill Watterson improved so much later on)
View attachment 375110
That's pretty solid. Even the pigeon
I know! Isn't it! I mean seriously gray fox would be just as welcome! (Especially one with bigger ears!)
that I could kind of use as a bat-eared fox substitute.
Although, the classic grey fox is prettier!
Wait didnt you call the sumatran tiger essential like a minute ago?
It's funny very few people actually voice this out loud, the aquatic pack really has one of the most lackluster rosters if someone doesn't care about the king penguin and grey seal. Sure the scenery was great with faux rocks and stained wood but it's the animals that always do the heavy lifting.
Sumatran had a mane that the Bengal doesn't. Plus, it's a darker shade of orange
The Sumatran tiger looks different enough though. I mean I'm sure to a tiger person. Whereas singing dogs can look like some dingoes. It's arbritary I guess...
...I make a pass for Sumatran Tiger I'll admit.
and the stripes pattern is different!
Sumatran is also smaller.
The problem is that most people say that deep diving came with the pack, which isn't true while deep diving came alongside the pack, in the free update. You don't need to buy the DLC to have deep diving
I love the accurate dinosaurs, but the change in design philosophy is very funny. I actually don’t mind the Jurassic World dinosaurs, only because they were never meant to be 100% real or accurate. But I would be lying if 8 said I didn’t love the new raptor.
Ofcourse the roster is lack luster if you dont care about the animals. But that goes for every single pack
Aquatic was amazing when it came out bring 3 animals completly unlike anything we had before, with whole new mechanic.
But nowadays it has fallen from favor since we got alot of alternatives for the diving animals
Pain, suffering evenAnd now JWE2 again overtook PZ in number of animals with feathers. 11 against 10.
Are feathers easier to do in JWE2?
But there werent any animals that could deep dive outside the pack besides the two crocs, so it might aswell was exlusive to the pack at the time
Funnily enough, at the same time the roster is awesome because it gives the more popular choices a cheaper, not as popular alternative. Kinda like how we have popular grizzly and the not as popular sun bear
In that sense, yes. However, this is a comment I still see to this day occasionally
I mean I'd be ok with:
- Bobcat (less furry than lynx)
- Bat-eared Fox (looks darker and raccoon-like compared to Fennec)
- Grey Fox (for Quell especially! It has a black tail tip as opposed to Red Fox color morphs)
- Masai Giraffe (more leaf like pattern as opposed to our giraffe's big blothces)
- Coyote (NOT unless we get a different canid first, but the coyote is easy to tell from shorter eared wolves)
- Grevy's Zebra (different stripes)
- Iberian Lynx (same continent as Eurasian)
- Cape Fox (looks like a fennec moreso)
- Corsac Fox (looks like a lighter red fox)
- Northern Giraffe (looks more like what we have)
- Great Plains wolf
- Mountain Zebra
Well yeah at the time it was one of the best packs we got, I was more thinking currently as people still hold aquatic to a high level of standard for some reason. The better choice of penguin, otter and reptiles kind of ruined the uniqueness of the roster.