No Single Player offline Mode then?

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
How can we work together with people who get what hey wanted and are now considering everyone else enemies of the game? God, we have all pledged for the Elite. so, all of us love the Elite. Some prefer to play it online, some offline. And both of these modes were promised.
Let me say it this way. Jake and Bill both supported elite and pledged KS campaign. Jake was excited about multiplayer game. Bill was hoping to play new elite old style - offline.
Jake got the multiplayer.
Bill did not get offline mode. So, Bill feels upset, angry, betrayed, tricked, call it whatever you want.
Jake then attacks Bill for not liking the multiplayer, he makes fun of him, tell him to shut up and get lost cause he will destroy the game. Ofcourse, Jake is not thinking that Bill is his fellow Elite fan who also helped him to get his multiplayer. And that same bill will not be able to enjoy single player mode.

To be honest, I have seen the worst humanity can offer on some other forums. I have considered this as the home of the knights, of the Elite. Surely was not expecting such amount of hate. I was foollishly expecting that even players who prefer multiplayer woul'd understand and even support their fellows who were hoping for offline single player since we were all here together right from the start (or when we learned that Elite and DB needs help).

Obviously I was not aware that chivalry was long dead even here...

That reminds me soo much of Star Citizen right there..
 
FWIW I am also unhappy with the lack of offline mode, however as I signed up through kickstarter I understand even if I wanted to ask for a refund (and I was really tempted when I first heard the news, especially as I read the newsletter and missed the announcement, it was that prominent...) it would be refused.

My literal first request on the Kickstarter was for there not to be multiplayer but I figured it can't be that bad since it won't affect me anyway.

So now I am well and truly you know what.


https://forums.frontier.co.uk/showthread.php?t=4642
 
Last edited:
They claim you need to connect to the shared universe. They don't need you to login. They want you to login, sure - that's DRM. In an offline game you could hack your commander file to give yourself a billion credits if you wanted to, and why not, you are only affecting yourself. Why can't you do the same with solo online? Have the server just take your client's word for what ship you are in, where you are & how many credits you have? It's solo play, so if you want to cheat your way to a fully loaded Anaconda, who should care apart from you? In an offline game, nobody. In solo online, nobody _should_ care, but I bet your 'save file' is actually held on ED's servers and thus can't be hacked...

In an offline universe that is shared with the online universe database you would be able to find all the secrets of the galaxy. And you may not do so but it's extremely likely someone else would share that with others or use that info themselves to give themselves an unfair advantage in the Online game. Personally I do not see the benefit of removing the mystery and fun of discovery from the game. In fact, Commanders did hack their files and gave themselves a billion credits (along with several other exploits) that only by moving aspects to the server side eliminated unbalancing the online game (which was always the vision we backed - despite the added enticement of offline which I am not arguing is/was/will be an issue).
Solo Online is part of the persistent galaxy. If you improve in solo you can take that improvement to group or open play mode(s). What you suggest would, again, unbalance the game. It has been suggested that solo online be separate from other modes for that reason (as well as an anticipated or theoretical advantage not having to interact with other players) which apparently is not part of Frontier's vision for Elite: Dangerous.
Apparently the shift for market transactions, equipment transactions, Cartography, saved games (and whatever else) to server side makes combining Offline with Online risky to the )online game) vision Frontier wanted to make.
Some find in incredulous that Frontier continued to try to solve the problem up until very recently and prefer to think Frontier made the decision a long time ago when they first started shifting transactions to server side to eliminate hacking exploits and hid it from everyone. Personally I believe it became more and more glaringly obvious as they continued with development and I feel it may have keep being placed on the back burner (as it were) until multiple ideas were exhausted to include it and as the vision became so much more than the original concept in regards to complexities and security requirements that it was decided it could not be included in the width and breath of the current development path, that it was a totally isolated development that would require a complete separation from the online game.

I have avoided getting into this thread as I have dreamed of playing this upgraded Elite since the mid-80's and I actually enjoy online aspects of it. I acknowledge others having opposing points of view and desires and I am not trying to dismiss or denounce their opinions, desires or reasoning at all. In fact I hope someday an offline version will exist!
 
Except of course, it does, it needs to know the commander to validate the transactions and market information, as a means of cheat protection. Thus, there will never be anonymous transaction info.

Why does it need to validate transactions? They are my transactions, I don't need them to affect the market prices of things, if anybody is going to affect market prices it'll be the players in multiplayer who have chosen to interact with each other & the market... If I want to spend my cheat-code acquired billions to buy a Lakon 9's worth of gold, why should the game care if the transaction would be valid in multi-player? I'm not in multi-player, I'm in solo play... market information? There will be websites carrying screen scraped price information from different places within hours of the game launching, I'll bet...
 
How can we work together with people who get what hey wanted and are now considering everyone else enemies of the game? God, we have all pledged for the Elite. so, all of us love the Elite. Some prefer to play it online, some offline. And both of these modes were promised..
Ok you are right....it will not help.
But what is now left to do ?
I can't play ED as I like...
I didn't get refund...
I didn't trust FD....
What will be next ????
Are you think all Offliner shall now leave and go ?
And is the behavior from the Onliner ok ?
Can you answer...honestly....?
 
My literal first request on the Kickstarter was for there not to be multiplayer but I figured it can't be that bad since it won't affect me anyway.

So now I am well and truly you know what.

Solo Online will still exist although it will require an internet connection. Perhaps I misunderstand you but you make it seem as if there is no solo play option in the online game (which includes open play, private groups & solo online).
 
not at first.

but soon.

my guess is 20 jumps.. its in my guts

I think it's twenty jumps top to bottom. And again, I am stock sure you are underestimating the powers of ten. How long would it take YOU to explore - not a sphere, but a bushel of twenty jumps from a core system?

Now take all the players in your shard. Multiply them by the time they spend playing. Now take your own play-time and divide that with the number you got from the first two factors.

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -

Solo Online will still exist although it will require an internet connection. Perhaps I misunderstand you but you make it seem as if there is no solo play option in the online game (which includes open play, private groups & solo online).

My point might become clearer if you look for my avatar on some of the previous posts and read those.

Shared universe is not truly solo, even without ganking PvPers.
 
Why does it need to validate transactions? They are my transactions, I don't need them to affect the market prices of things, if anybody is going to affect market prices it'll be the players in multiplayer who have chosen to interact with each other & the market... If I want to spend my cheat-code acquired billions to buy a Lakon 9's worth of gold, why should the game care if the transaction would be valid in multi-player? I'm not in multi-player, I'm in solo play... market information? There will be websites carrying screen scraped price information from different places within hours of the game launching, I'll bet...

What cheat code? You're playing a persistently online game. Even in solo mode - there's no cheat code, there's no option to mode the client lest you be banned and have your account revoked, there's no messing around with the galaxy, you play their way, and you experience the content how they see fit.
 
another reason I think online is mandatory for:

Progression of Civilization.

I do think there will be more and more stations / civilization progressing into unexplored areas. this will not be artificial btu I think controlled and watched by the devs with monthly or so updates. therefore to have a living growing universe online is mandatory. then maybe some events. and all that stuff. I dont think you can write AI that make up those things and work perfect in Offline mode.

I also think they generated the 400 bn galaxy - but no one really chekced it? the algorithm might have some strange errors or side products. therefore they need to also control that aspect too.
 
Not to mention the fact that anyone who IS a lawyer would never, ever, post anything that could be construed as legal advice on this forum. And even if they did post a mere opinion, they'd add a disclaimer denoting it as such, and making it absolutely clear that they are not offering legal advice via their post.

Ask your lawyer if you want to know why this is important :)

Nah, I have no problem giving anonymous(ish) legal advice. There is a requirement that it would be reasonable to rely on that advice. 'Someone that said they were a lawyer wrote this on an internet forum' would be unlikely to get over that hurdle. (;

Commander Spook
 
What cheat code? You're playing a persistently online game. Even in solo mode - there's no cheat code, there's no option to mode the client lest you be banned and have your account revoked, there's no messing around with the galaxy, you play their way, and you experience the content how they see fit.

Err... yes. That is what they are enforcing. But that is an arbitrary choice by FD...

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -

another reason I think online is mandatory for:

Progression of Civilization.

I do think there will be more and more stations / civilization progressing into unexplored areas. this will not be artificial btu I think controlled and watched by the devs with monthly or so updates. therefore to have a living growing universe online is mandatory. then maybe some events. and all that stuff. I dont think you can write AI that make up those things and work perfect in Offline mode.

I also think they generated the 400 bn galaxy - but no one really chekced it? the algorithm might have some strange errors or side products. therefore they need to also control that aspect too.

And that's very cool & immersive and everything and I'm very glad it exists. But a solo player wants the game to be in the same state he or she left it in at the end of their last play session...
 
When the 16th comes and the servers go offline just like the other high profile online-only games it's going to be a sad realization for some people.
 
It seems to me that following DB's Q&A today, this is where we're at:

  • Offline mode is definitely out. They tried but the solutions they came up with just didnt cut it. This has upset a few folks for different reasons.
    • Some folks wanted offline mode because they go long periods without any connectivity at all. These guys are out of luck.
    • Some folks worry about extended periods of poor connectivity (distinct from no connectivity above) - these folks should be reassured by the answer DB gave where he reported successfully playing via a tethered cellphone on a moving train. The bandwidth requirements of solo online are quite minimal and even a dodgy connection with more latency than you'd want for multiplpayer should still work.
    • Some folks are worried about "What if the servers go away? Will I still be able to play it in 30 years?" Given DB's statement in the Q&A about FD taking periodic archives of the game, including server code and galaxy state and their intention to release such an archive if they ever did decide to shut down the servers, I think we're covered here. This is all the resources needed to take over and establish community-run servers and given the community around Elite it's pretty much a no-brainer that this would happen.
    • Some object on principle, regaring it as a "broken promise" or "DRM" Not sure what to say here, these guys are peeved on principle and they won't stop being peeved no matter how long we discuss it. Are you peeved enough to quit the game? Your call but if you are we'd be sorry to see you go.
  • We don't wasnt to see anyone quit the game over this, we'd love to play alongside you for the next 30 years. However, quite possibly some number of folks will. Their options vary depending on how their relationship with FD stands.
    • KS backers. You were investing in the project, not purchasing anything. Your investment has not returned the full extent of what you expected but that's a risk you take when investing. The "Risks and Challenges" section of the KS details should have made you aware of this. Given that disclosure I wouldn't think you'll get any of that cash back.
    • Backers that bought in post-KS for the alpha and beta stages: Technically you bought into participating in the project as testers, expecting to be rewarded with a copy of the released game (plus other perks) when it finally went live. You are still entitled to that, but I can see (personal opinion) it being fair for FD to refund you the value of a release copy if you want out.
    • Pre-orders: Cancel your order at the store. You'll get your money back and can walk away.
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom