Game Discussions Star Citizen Discussion Thread v12

ad6BpJn.png


Temple of Boom woulda been better...

"Cargo Cult Empires"

SC really is a more expensive, buggy take on Garry's Mod.
 
You'll be riding a Hull C in no time!

I still haven't done my hotas binds...or I'd join in the discussion :)

It's not that I haven't played or anything but only as Badger's turret crew for a few hours every now and then. I just can't summon up the energy to fight through the utter clusterfarce of SC's controls menu all over again...just think of all my ships I could be randomly exploding exiting a hangar... :oops:

Come to think of it, I'd rather eat live wasps :whistle:
 
Last edited:
Ahaha, the weirdness of the development of Star Citizen is best demonstrated in the kind of questions that would be simply impossible for any other non-existing game:

"Should CIG prioritize ships that are nearing 10 years since concept sale?"

There is so much to unpack in just the question! 10 years? Concept sale? WAT!!!


#notascam
 
#notascam
I saw that shared on the refunds sub and I'm using this as a not at all subtle excuse to note that in the last few months, the number of new posters on that sub has really grown. It used to be the same 10 or so regular posters there but now there are new people every day. I've been watching it for years and don't remember ever seeing this kind of a jump in engagement.
 

Viajero

Volunteer Moderator
The Progress Tracker is back. I don't know how to read it.
The Vehicle EU Team has 56 deliverables booked through December but they seem to include everything, like 74 weeks for the BMM, last updated 2021.
Edit: now I see it.
lol
1724304277408.png


By the gods, this is so much more info than last CitizenCon!
 

Viajero

Volunteer Moderator
Instead of pinpointing individual developers, we’re using placeholder headcounts and disciplines for each deliverable.
🙄

Poor Shinyhobo:
When reading the reports or scanning their version of the tracker, you'll see that very, very, very few developers are assigned in these teams (each has one). Because this is what the data says, it is what it will display; you can ignore any time/work calculations as a result. If the trend of using "placeholder counts" (ie data omission) continues into the future, I may eventually drop this data from the reports.

What are the chances, we think, that "placeholder counts" are just temporary?

Also, what actual real reason could CIG possibly have for not wanting to show actual developer numbers, I wonder...
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom