Could someone correct me, as far as I recall, Frontier haven't given the dimensions of the Mandalay, have they? Where has the image of the Mandalay over the Mamba on a landing pad come from? I don't recall that in the stream.
Something tells me that an expedition consisting of Mandalays will be organized soon after the ship appears in the game.View attachment 400679
View attachment 400680
I am sure there is someones better than me with that
At least I have some fun today
When I look after a while, Mandalay should be probably bigger that here.
Something tells me that an expedition consisting of Mandalays will be organized soon after the ship appears in the game.
It'll be a very welcome sight, it's been too long since DW2 took place.
It comes from the statement that The Mandalay has the Mamba cockpit. Everyone sort of automatically assumes it's an exact copy, same size, same two seats. From that was the model scaled in relation to the Mamba. I think the original assumption is already wrong. I think it's the same style of cockpit, but it might well be smaller and only single seat. The thread has already shown that identical twin cockpits would mean that the Mandalay would be too wide for the pad.Could someone correct me, as far as I recall, Frontier haven't given the dimensions of the Mandalay, have they? Where has the image of the Mandalay over the Mamba on a landing pad come from? I don't recall that in the stream.
Why?(I don't think that's appropriate for this thread)
I've been thinking about Anaconda for a long time, but I've always been amused by the other thing. How it could fly at the same speed as the Corvette with such weight and even worse maneuverability. They both have the same class 7 engine, and the Corvette is twice as heavy.
It comes from the statement that The Mandalay has the Mamba cockpit. Everyone sort of automatically assumes it's an exact copy, same size, same two seats. From that was the model scaled in relation to the Mamba. I think the original assumption is already wrong. I think it's the same style of cockpit, but it might well be smaller and only single seat. The thread has already shown that identical twin cockpits would mean that the Mandalay would be too wide for the pad.
(this is a departure from the topic, after all)Why?
You don't see the connection? Please explain
This would be true if all the ship characteristics just came from the specifications of the modules combined with the ship mass. However this is a game, and the ships perform like FDEV want them to perform. You can see this most clearly with shields. Compare the same size 7 shield on a Corvette, a Conda and a Clipper, very big differences there. Same with thrusters. Ships cap out at very different speeds, even with similar mass and the same thrusters.(this is a departure from the topic, after all)
A body with less mass accelerates faster from the reaction thrust and brakes faster.
Two previous ships have the same cockpit as their predecessors, so assumption is pretty fine in my opinion
T-10 has folding wings.Yea, but the Pythons are rather similar in size, T8 is a bit bigger than the T7, while Mandy - as pictured from the cockpit size matchup - doesnt seem to fit on the M-pad unless it has folding wings.
The only folding stuff they showed off were the engines. That doesnt mean the wings dont fold, but in this case i would expect to see them folded in the pic with the ship landed.
It was shown in a video by The Buur pit. You can watch the video HERE.Could someone correct me, as far as I recall, Frontier haven't given the dimensions of the Mandalay, have they? Where has the image of the Mandalay over the Mamba on a landing pad come from? I don't recall that in the stream.
What about the ship against a pilot figure? Such as seen in this image:It comes from the statement that The Mandalay has the Mamba cockpit. Everyone sort of automatically assumes it's an exact copy, same size, same two seats. From that was the model scaled in relation to the Mamba. I think the original assumption is already wrong. I think it's the same style of cockpit, but it might well be smaller and only single seat. The thread has already shown that identical twin cockpits would mean that the Mandalay would be too wide for the pad.
...I am relly interested with more comparision, with more ships. For an example if cabin of Python and Python Mk II are exactly the same size. (We checked with friendst T-8 and T-7 and there cabins are the same size, exactly).
To be a viable explorer, it’s gonna need a decent number of internals … yet the ship looks smaller than a Mamba which has rubbish internals … so presumably the “belly” is to make up for that?
I reckon / hope it’ll be a C6 FSD rather than magically weigh less than every other medium ship.
I think it will need a single C6 internal for a Fuel Scoop but then the remaining internals will jump down in size. Would hope for at least a further C4, though - for either a GFSD Booster or double garage - but most of the remaining internals being C2 / C1 for AMFU, repair limpet controller and a little cargo. It’s gonna be a tough balance …
Personally I’m hoping it will have some decent weapons (similar to Phantom) so I can use it as a long-range mission runner but my fear is they’ll completely shaft its weapon compliment because it’s internals will have to be decent and otherwise it would just become a better Mamba.
Likewise Thrusters … one would assume it will come with C5 but - again - that might be too close to the Mamba on speed and I’m assuming - give they’ve said it will be very agile - it will therefore be slower than the Mamba. Which is fine!
Same place all the speculation that decided it would be an Imperial Explorer came from.Could someone correct me, as far as I recall, Frontier haven't given the dimensions of the Mandalay, have they? Where has the image of the Mandalay over the Mamba on a landing pad come from? I don't recall that in the stream.
From the corner of fun.Same place all the speculation that decided it would be an Imperial Explorer came from.![]()
I believe that FDev is reusing the exact same cockpits from the predecessor ships in order to save design work. I would imagine it's not a trivial task to create an entirely new cockpit, or even take an existing one and drastically change it eg. to make it smaller.It comes from the statement that The Mandalay has the Mamba cockpit. Everyone sort of automatically assumes it's an exact copy, same size, same two seats. From that was the model scaled in relation to the Mamba. I think the original assumption is already wrong. I think it's the same style of cockpit, but it might well be smaller and only single seat.