Ship specific UI is cool if all you have in your fleet is a few ships which you use often. If you have a dozen or more different types then it's a different story.
Game Discussions Star Citizen Discussion Thread v12
- Thread starter Yaffle
- Start date
-
- Tags
- star citizen
Ship specific UI is cool if all you have in your fleet is a few ships which you use often. If you have a dozen or more different types then it's a different story.
There are lots of toilets in settlements. None of them flush though.Ahh, but does 27 full ED's have any toilets?
Viajero
Volunteer Moderator
They actually do! in Oddy settlementsAhh, but does 27 full ED's have any toilets?
Edit: must read last replies
Last edited:
Viajero
Volunteer Moderator
I hope it is clear by now that the removal from the store had nothing to do with a "price update" but rather perhaps with regulatory or legal issues of some kind, like regarding pre-selling of a product for many years without no planned released date at all, or some such. There is a small possibility it could be also linked to the CryTek lawsuit aftermath although I doubt it.
Last edited:
There are lots of toilets in settlements. None of them flush though.
You don't know how to use the seashells?
Oh god yeah. All dreams are still officially in play. (Although 100 solar systems and NPC crew will be 'after 1.0 No dates...').
Engineering Tier 0 is re-entering the pre-test build next patch. (Spoiler: It will break many things
). They have lightning damaging ships and impenetrable storms in the patch itself. (Any inability to land in the dark is both gameplay and user error ).Queued up for the middle future are the latest re-reworks to the flight model (atmospheric flight, again, quantum travel changes etc). And the 'maelstrom' physics system. (IE the re-rework of ship damage, including projectile penetration and component damage. Which also changes the flight model as art now defines mass. Alongside Engineering it will break many things
)The 'year of stability' will lose its stabilisers fairly swiftly if that lot actually makes the 2025 cut...
So 800 million later still the same we sell ships and you buy them and that's it..... will it ever be a game? 2 billion later and in 2045Oh god yeah. All dreams are still officially in play. (Although 100 solar systems and NPC crew will be 'after 1.0 No dates...').
Engineering Tier 0 is re-entering the pre-test build next patch. (Spoiler: It will break many things
Queued up for the middle future are the latest re-reworks to the flight model (atmospheric flight, again, quantum travel changes etc). And the 'maelstrom' physics system. (IE the re-rework of ship damage, including projectile penetration and component damage. Which also changes the flight model as art now defines mass. Alongside Engineering it will break many things
The 'year of stability' will lose its stabilisers fairly swiftly if that lot actually makes the 2025 cut...
Meanwhile the perplexing whale rage torrent continues...
Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/1ku37o4/cig_not_a_penny_you_will_see_until_i_purchase_my/
Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/1ku37o4/cig_not_a_penny_you_will_see_until_i_purchase_my/
With my evil head on I almost hope fdev see this and price the Panther Clipper at some massive number - after all it is a massive ship. Both games have chumps around who will pay over the odds because they don't value money.
Meanwhile I'll pick it up in a few months for free
Meanwhile I'll pick it up in a few months for free
Viajero
Volunteer Moderator
It is a game, albeit an extremely broken and bad one.
I really don't get it. CIG constantly and consistently lie over and over again and yet everyone laughs. After spending $350 on a virtual ship that doesn't do what they promote it be able to do. I find the whole situation to be quite insane. If these streamers were laughing about any other product that is not fit for purpose bought from Amazon, say, it would be to warn potential consumers not to purchase the defective product. Whereas this is being framed to sell trash as some kind of treasure. Which could prompt questions as to what they're getting from it themselves by doing so.
Back in the early 80s I remember when you could send off to get the gas masks that were worn in the belly of the monster (asteroid-wurm? Hey that could be a "new" idea for SC..) in Empire Strikes Back, for your Star Wars figures.. they showed the gas mask wrapped around Chewbacca's head but when you got them they were too small and you couldn't close the loop. And there was a short period of outrage in the playground, but these were gotten for a few proofs of purchase and return postage or something minimal like that. I don't care how rich someone thinks they are, $350 is a lot of money to pay to find out that it doesn't actually work as advertised. And cue laughter. For someone who bought this I kinda feel like the Joe Pesci in Goodfellas response is more appropriate here; "you think this is funny?"
rootsrat
Volunteer Moderator
LOL, now need to watch the faithful who defended CIG not allowing custom nameplates on the ships do a 180 on this.
Viajero
Volunteer Moderator
....
They do defend CIG only allowing names on expensive ships and that ship names must be globally unique.
So they'll end up with a hundred different spellings of "Enterprise", I guess.
It only works for store-bought ships, of course. Pay 2 name.