Universal Cartographics Galactic Record Breakers

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Brokenstorm I added your records, the t-tauri weight recors is a tie though with the current record

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -



i guess you found the first one with only that name, most of the time they have a class (former state) mentioned, time for pataa to ad a new category ;-)

no its just an m-type, you need to check gal map for this one
 
Corona Australis and Corona Borealis. Also called simply "Meridiana"[URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corona_Australis#cite_note-FOOTNOTEBagnall2012170-2"]][/URL] it is a white main sequence star located 130 light years away from Earth, with an apparent magnitude of 4.10 and spectral type A2Va.A rapidly rotating star, it spins at almost 200 km per second at its equator, making a complete revolution in around 14 hours.[URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corona_Australis#cite_note-FOOTNOTERoyerZorecG.C3.B3mez2007463-18"][[/URL]Like the star Vega, it has excess infrared radiation, which indicates it may be ringed by a disk of dust. It is currently a main-sequence star, but will eventually evolve into a white dwarf


the bug seems to be in the name the stars you are speaking of are actually located further out in the game, I think they are at the location the names of these stars should be

I'll show you why I think there are holes in your post (nothing to do with black holes ;) ):
1. Despite many links you provided I can't see the most important: where have you got your whole info about the star from?
2. Corona Australis is a constellation of stars not a star
3. R Coronae Australis is obscured by interstellar dust and estimations of its distance from Sol vary 30-500 Ly (as you could see in the link I previously provided) but on wikipedia (this is where your links are from) they state approx. 80 Ly (so the distance of R Coronae Austrini A from Sol is not a bug at all) - sorry but I'm not sure I understand your last sentence so perhaps you have something different in mind
4. There is a huge difference in size between A2V main-sequence star and B5III (you said it's a main-sequence star but in-game it certainly isn't - haven't you read info about main-sequence stars you linked?) but there are no main-sequence stars of A and B classes that are the size of white dwarfs (because they stop being main-sequence before that and even subdwarfs are much too big) as is R Coronae Austrini A (I remind you: B5III in-game - it's not a designation for a main-sequence star but for a giant star that's just can't be the size of a white dwarf by definition)
5. Almost every main-sequence star will eventually evolve into a white dwarf so what it has to do with the issue? Your interpretation of "will eventually evolve" looks strange to me - I see no logical link to the size of a star.
6. Main-sequence stars with the mass of R Coronae Austrini A don't evolve directly into a white dwarf (please, read info from links you provide, first) so its size can't be so small because "it's in transition".

i guess you found the first one with only that name, most of the time they have a class (former state) mentioned, time for pataa to ad a new category ;-)

no its just an m-type, you need to check gal map for this one
I confirm - M-type giants have usually such limited description. However, perhaps in the future we will need to subcategorize protostars (Herbig and T-Tauri) because they have different spectral classes, eg. there could be T-Tauri of A-type, F-Type, K-type etc. when they are properly discerned in-game.
 
Irregularly shaped gas giant..... I'm not just seeing things, am I?...

Screenshot_0041.jpgScreenshot_0042.jpg
 
and a few more from me :)

YOUNGEST S-TYPE STAR
BLU EUQ CM-D D12-7 WITH 4,500 MILLION YEARS CMDR TRAV ELER

HOTTEST S-TYPE STAR
BLU EUQ CM-D D12-7 WITH 3,522.00K CMDR TRAV ELER

S-TYPE STAR WITH MOST BODIES
BLU EUQ CM-D D12-7 WITH 5 BODIES CMDR TRAV ELER

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -

and more :)

COLDEST WATER GIANT
BLU EUQ IZ-O C19-28 13 WITH 146K CMDR TRAV ELER

View attachment 13775

HEAVIEST HELIUM GIANT
TRIFID SECTOR BA-A E38 7 WITH 3,922.1655 EARTH MASSES CMDR TRAV ELER


HELIUMGIANT_HEAVIEST.png


T-TAURI WITH MOST BODIES
TRIFID SECTOR BA-A E36 B WITH 16 BODIES CMDR TRAV ELER

TTAURI_MOSTBODIES2.pngView attachment 13770
 

Attachments

  • sstar_5bodies.png
    sstar_5bodies.png
    154.6 KB · Views: 64
Last edited:
Trav ElEr, provide pictures with full names of objects, please - they can't be seen in case of your water giant and T-Tauri.
 
COLDEST WATER GIANT
BLU EUQ IZ-O C19-28 13 WITH 146K CMDR TRAV ELER

I've added all except this one. Please provide a screenshot where the full name is visible (the T-Tauri is ok, I can see the name in the System Map screenshot).
Oh, and please put your pictures in Spoiler Tags.
 
Is there a category for 'most Terraforming Candidates in a system' ?

I tried to find somesuch in the PDF, but failed...
 
Patau, do not add white dwarfs types, please! I was mistaken and in the current state of the game white dwarfs are actually very rare in the Galaxy because they look like not procedurally generated at all - I see not a single one outside of the colonized bubble!!! (ticketed - #00000036244).
 
Is there a category for 'most Terraforming Candidates in a system' ?

I tried to find somesuch in the PDF, but failed...

yep, I had forgotten to move it from the old terraformable section to the general solar system section.
its now on page 10 the current record is 9 terraformable planets in one system!

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -

Patau, do not add white dwarfs types, please! I was mistaken and in the current state of the game white dwarfs are actually very rare in the Galaxy because they look like not procedurally generated at all - I see not a single one outside of the colonized bubble!!! (ticketed - #00000036244).

np, did you check on beta 1.1? is it the same there?
 
Hey all, I found two extremely close systems on my trip to the California Nebula. From 7 Cameleopardalis C, only 3169Ls to 7 Cameleopardalis B.

It looks like a bug actually since some in-system bodies are further than that though ... I also had a bit of trouble travelling from C to B, because the neutron star in that system was right in front of the target system, obscuring it when I tried to use the FSD. I had to go out of the ecliptic plane a bit to get it to work.

Here's a screenshot of the navigation panel :

7_cameleopardis.png
 
Last edited:
Hey all, I found two extremely close systems on my trip to the California Nebula. From 7 Cameleopardis C, only 3169Ls to 7 Cameleopardis B.

It looks like a bug actually since some in-system bodies are further than that though ... I also had a bit of trouble travelling from C to B, because the neutron star in that system was right in front of the target system, obscuring it when I tried to use the FSD. I had to go out of the ecliptic plane a bit to get it to work.

Here's a screenshot of the navigation panel :

View attachment 13813

wow, that's ridiculously close!
looks like fd have already implemented microjumps!
actually that could make a good mechanic for hiding secret military basses etc.
added to book!
 
Last edited:
Two records broken in one system.

Oldest Black Hole and Oldest Neutron Star
Was;

OLDEST BLACK HOLE
FOERDY FG-Y G202 A AT 16,941 MILLION YEARS
now
OLDEST BLACK HOLE
THROEPPS MS-U f2-2907 A AT 17,523 MILLION YEARS - CMDR CALBARON

and;
OLDEST NEUTRON STAR
FOERDY FG-Y G202 B AT 16,941 MILLION YEARS
is now;

OLDEST NEUTRON STAR
THROEPPS MS-U f2-2907 B, C AND D AT 17,523 MILLION YEARS - CMDR CALBARON


Oldest black Hole.jpgOldest Neutron Star.jpg
 
Unless I've got the wrong end of the category stick, and if I have apologies, this is more massive than current record for heaviest non-Gas giant ringed body:

Screenshot_0160.jpg
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom