Corona Australis and Corona Borealis. Also called simply "Meridiana"[URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corona_Australis#cite_note-FOOTNOTEBagnall2012170-2"]][/URL] it is a white main sequence star located 130 light years away from Earth, with an apparent magnitude of 4.10 and spectral type A2Va.A rapidly rotating star, it spins at almost 200 km per second at its equator, making a complete revolution in around 14 hours.[URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corona_Australis#cite_note-FOOTNOTERoyerZorecG.C3.B3mez2007463-18"][[/URL]Like the star Vega, it has excess infrared radiation, which indicates it may be ringed by a disk of dust. It is currently a main-sequence star, but will eventually evolve into a white dwarf
the bug seems to be in the name the stars you are speaking of are actually located further out in the game, I think they are at the location the names of these stars should be
I'll show you why I think there are holes in your post (nothing to do with black holes

):
1. Despite many links you provided I can't see the most important: where have you got your whole info about the star from?
2. Corona Australis is a constellation of stars not a star
3. R Coronae Australis is obscured by interstellar dust and estimations of its distance from Sol vary 30-500 Ly (as you could see in the link I previously provided) but on wikipedia (this is where your links are from) they state approx. 80 Ly (so the distance of R Coronae Austrini A from Sol is not a bug at all) - sorry but I'm not sure I understand your last sentence so perhaps you have something different in mind
4. There is a huge difference in size between A2V main-sequence star and B5III (you said it's a main-sequence star but in-game it certainly isn't - haven't you read info about main-sequence stars you linked?) but there are no main-sequence stars of A and B classes that are the size of white dwarfs (because they stop being main-sequence before that and even subdwarfs are much too big) as is R Coronae Austrini A (I remind you: B5III in-game - it's not a designation for a main-sequence star but for a giant star that's just can't be the size of a white dwarf by definition)
5. Almost every main-sequence star will eventually evolve into a white dwarf so what it has to do with the issue? Your interpretation of "will eventually evolve" looks strange to me - I see no logical link to the size of a star.
6. Main-sequence stars with the mass of R Coronae Austrini A don't evolve directly into a white dwarf (please, read info from links you provide, first) so its size can't be so small because "it's in transition".
i guess you found the first one with only that name, most of the time they have a class (former state) mentioned, time for pataa to ad a new category ;-)
no its just an m-type, you need to check gal map for this one
I confirm - M-type giants have usually such limited description. However, perhaps in the future we will need to subcategorize protostars (Herbig and T-Tauri) because they have different spectral classes, eg. there could be T-Tauri of A-type, F-Type, K-type etc. when they are properly discerned in-game.