Universal Cartographics Galactic Record Breakers

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
LARGEST MS-TYPE STAR
HYPIO BLOU AO-F D12-6609 WITH 34.6450 SOLAR RADIUS

HEAVIEST MS-TYPE STAR
HYPIO BLOU AO-F D12-6609 WITH 1.4492 SOLAR MASSES

HOTTEST MS-TYPE STAR
HYPIO BLOU AO-F D12-6609 WITH EMPERATURE OF 3,628.00 K

YOUNGEST MS-TYPE STAR
HYPIO BLOU AO-F D12-6609 WITH 4,350 MILLION

CMDR tired_man
ASP "Curious Hedgehog"

 
Last edited:
SMALLEST HIGH METAL CONTENT PLANET
FLYOOE HYPOEA ZR-G B58-0 A 1 WITH A RADIUS OF 271 KM cmdr MAGNUS ROTTCODD
Smallest High content.jpg
 
Last edited:
SYSTEM WITH THE MOST TERRAFORMABLE HIGH METAL CONTENT PLANETS
FLYOOE HYPOEA TK-C D14-1 WITH 7 TERRAFORMABLE HIGH METAL CONTENT PLANETS cmdr MAGNUS ROTTCODD

TF1.jpg
TF2.jpg
TF3.jpg
TF4.jpg
TF5.jpg
TF6.jpg
TF7.jpg
 
I did not first discover this system but it hasn't been reported.

SYSTEM WITH HEAVIEST C-TYPE STAR
HIP 43123 WITH A MASS OF 2.0937
heaviest C-type.jpg
 
Last edited:
Old record;

SYSTEM WITH THE MOST WATER GIANTS
HIP 21776 WITH 2 WATER GIANTS

New record;

SYSTEM WITH THE MOST WATER GIANTS

HYPAO CHREA AA-A G0 WITH 5 WATER GIANTS - CMDR CALBARON


water giant 1.jpgwater giant 2.jpgwater giant 3.jpgwater giant 4.jpgwater giant 5.jpg


While it's not claimed, I may as well fill in the Sag A distance record too (though it will fall quickly)

FURTHEST WATER GIANT FROM SAGITTARIUS A*
HYPAO CHREA AA-A G0 4,5,6,7 & 10 AT 17,041.48LY - CMDR CALBARON

distance from Sag A.jpg
 
Last edited:
and another g type star in the galaxy map with a f-type super giant description. Makes it 4 out of 4 for me. Would be kinda cool if we could move this from a monologue more or less to a discussion... ;-)

anybody left who does not think the system map description of g-type supergiants is bugged and f-type super giant is displayed?

fgconfused8.pngfgconfused7.png

in the meantime, suriving it will only as long as above bug is not agreed upon:

LARGEST G-TYPE STAR
HD 17245 WITH A SOLAR RADIUS OF 35.4970 CMDR TRAV ELER


and my first S one I believe:

HEAVIEST S-TYPE STAR
HD 14028 A WITH 2.0703 SOLAR MASSES CMDR TRAV ELER

sstar_heaviest.pnggstar_largest.png
 
and another g type star in the galaxy map with a f-type super giant description. Makes it 4 out of 4 for me. Would be kinda cool if we could move this from a monologue more or less to a discussion... ;-)

I... I'm certain you're right. I don't think I've been to any yellow supergiant so... can't be of much use here :p

In other news, I'm back in civilization. I think I'll stay within civilized space until 1.2 plus the inevitable array of hotfixes, and will plan my next exploration trip after that.
 
Last edited:
ADDED LATEST RECORDS :D
SYSTEM WITH THE MOST TERRAFORMABLE HIGH METAL CONTENT PLANETS
FLYOOE HYPOEA TK-C D14-1 WITH 7 TERRAFORMABLE HIGH METAL CONTENT PLANETS cmdr MAGNUS ROTTCODD


how many terraformable planets of all types in that system? the current record is 9

I did not first discover this system but it hasn't been reported.

SYSTEM WITH HEAVIEST C-TYPE STAR
HIP 43123 WITH A MASS OF 2.0937
poster gets the record

Old record;

SYSTEM WITH THE MOST WATER GIANTS
HIP 21776 WITH 2 WATER GIANTS

New record;

SYSTEM WITH THE MOST WATER GIANTS

HYPAO CHREA AA-A G0 WITH 5 WATER GIANTS - CMDR CALBARON




While it's not claimed, I may as well fill in the Sag A distance record too (though it will fall quickly)

FURTHEST WATER GIANT FROM SAGITTARIUS A*
HYPAO CHREA AA-A G0 4,5,6,7 & 10 AT 17,041.48LY - CMDR CALBARON


ah, another of my records gone

and another g type star in the galaxy map with a f-type super giant description. Makes it 4 out of 4 for me. Would be kinda cool if we could move this from a monologue more or less to a discussion... ;-)

anybody left who does not think the system map description of g-type supergiants is bugged and f-type super giant is displayed?


in the meantime, suriving it will only as long as above bug is not agreed upon:

LARGEST G-TYPE STAR
HD 17245 WITH A SOLAR RADIUS OF 35.4970 CMDR TRAV ELER


and my first S one I believe:

HEAVIEST S-TYPE STAR
HD 14028 A WITH 2.0703 SOLAR MASSES CMDR TRAV ELER


can't help you with this one haven't seen any recently to check hopefully 1.2 will be out next week will check it then
 
"how many terraformable planets of all types in that system? the current record is 9 "

Just 8, those 7 + 1 terraformable water world. And a Earth like world. Nice system for humans. :)
 
Hello, long time no see! Wonderful finds there, it's nice to read the thread after being away a few weeks :)

Came across this today, very close to inhabited space:

LARGEST G-TYPE STAR
D CEN WITH A SOLAR RADIUS OF 69.4736 - JACK LUMINOUS

largest G.jpg
 
howdie all,

let me get these two out of the way real quick first:

METAL RICH PLANET WITH THE MOST MOONS
2MASS JO3291977+3124572 BC 1 WITH 3 MOONS CMDR TRAV ELER

SMALLEST CLASS V GAS GIANT
2MASS JO3291977+3124572 A 2 WITH A RADIUS OF 30,816KM CMDR TRAV ELER

metalrich_mostmoons.pnggasgiantV_smallest.png
 
that out of the way, back to the f/g confused super giants.

None of you really have to go anywhere and visit potential f/g confused stars yourself.

I am doing it and bringing the evidence, so y'all don't have to :)


What should happen though is that a decision is made. If I am right, and G-Type super giants have a description of F-Type super giants by error.
That would on the one hand mean. Some stars are eligible under the G-Type category. Which are now not. Which is the smaller of the issues.

The bigger one would be. Some F-Star records based on F-star super giant descriptions might actually be G-Type ones. And exisiting records would have to be checked
against the galaxy map type description.

And future F/G super giant submissions would need to include a galaxy map screenshot.


I think I am pretty done with running all over collecting evidence. Found 2 more yesterday. Another F/G confused super giant. And a F/F unconfused super giant. The last
one is important for "color" reasons.


So let me present my findings that are spread out over many posts all here in one place:

Here's the list of f/g confused super giants. For all six supergiants, the galaxy map says g-type. the system map says f-type super giant:

fgconfused1.pngfgconfused2.pngfgconfused3.pngfgconfused4.pngfgconfused5.pngfgconfused6.pngfgconfused7.pngfgconfused8.pngfgconfused9.pngfgconfused10.pngfgconfused11.pngfgconfused12.png

if I might make your retina pay special attention to the color of each and every one of those stars in the system map. The well known by most of us G-type yellow-orangy color.


And here's the f/f unconfused super giant. where galaxy map and system map both say type F:

ffunconfused1.pngffunconfused2.png

again, put your retinas focus on system map coloring of the super giant. The well known white-yellowish scheme we all recognize as F-type.


I can only come to one conclusion. description of g-type super giants is wrong in the system map and says f-type super giant instead. Result of that is some f-type records might be wrong....

I want to get back to civilised space for 1.2 and turn in my 1700 systems explored and hope it will be sufficient for pioneer. And hop in a vulture and fdl and give them a spin around combat zones.
I kinda like equilibrium among my ranks and going from dangerous to deadly would feel balanced with the pioneer from ranger ;-)

Anyway. I might pick up some more f/g, f/f super giants if I happen to be close by. But my zipping all over the place to collect them days are definitely over. ;-)
 
Last edited:
What should happen though is that a decision is made. If I am right, and G-Type super giants have a description of F-Type super giants by error.
That would on the one hand mean. Some stars are eligible under the G-Type category. Which are now not. Which is the smaller of the issues.

The bigger one would be. Some F-Star records based on F-star super giant descriptions might actually be G-Type ones. And exisiting records would have to be checked
against the galaxy map type description.

Yeah, checking over all the current and previous records would be a pain. Poor book-keepers...

Slightly offtopic, but I'd actually like to have main sequence stars in separate categories from giants in the book, considering that the game actually differentiates between them (henceforth making it possible for us to rely on the line drawn by the game, not having to draw a line ourselves) --- however then we would be struggling with for example bugged red giant stars, whose stats are those of regular red dwarfs, but get the red giant description for unknown reasons.

I suppose it all boils down to FD continuing to fix the system map description errors in the end.
 
At my first exploring run I found already several record-breaking sites. With just some 400 systems explored so far, this strikes me as a little odd. I count five records without much effort. Are records just standing for a short while still, or are too few explorers actually taking stock of their finds? Anyway, here the first three of those I uncovered (the others will follow once I have turned them in - if I make it home, of course):


YOUNGEST G-TYPE STAR
SYNUEFE XI-R C21-9 A AT 110 MILLION YEARS
CMDR TRAP ARECEV
qIsCebZ.png

YOUNGEST T-TYPE STAR
PENCIL SECTOR CP-Z A2 AT 106 MILLION YEARS
CMDR TRAP ARECEV
ounFYKR.png

LARGEST Y-TYPE STAR
SYNUEFE RZ-P A87-0 AT A SOLAR RADIUS OF 0.1406
CMDR TRAP ARECEV
PYKa4o9.png
 
At my first exploring run I found already several record-breaking sites. With just some 400 systems explored so far, this strikes me as a little odd. I count five records without much effort. Are records just standing for a short while still, or are too few explorers actually taking stock of their finds? Anyway, here the first three of those I uncovered (the others will follow once I have turned them in - if I make it home, of course):

It isn´t that strange, because some records are "cooler" than others, and youngest, coldest, smallest (or biggest dwarf-something) isn´t in that categori - so fewer looks for them. And I might have passed some record breaking stars because I mostly look for planets. The Holy Grail for me would be to find the hottest high metal /metall rich planet. It would have a pretty big chanse to be the biggest and with the heaviest surface pressure as well.
And if you want to be the first to explore a system - avoid Nebulas! :p They attract explorers like no tomorrow.
 
It isn´t that strange, because some records are "cooler" than others, and youngest, coldest, smallest (or biggest dwarf-something) isn´t in that categori - so fewer looks for them. And I might have passed some record breaking stars because I mostly look for planets. The Holy Grail for me would be to find the hottest high metal /metall rich planet. It would have a pretty big chanse to be the biggest and with the heaviest surface pressure as well.
And if you want to be the first to explore a system - avoid Nebulas! :p They attract explorers like no tomorrow.

Hi, I am back, all new records are added to the book I guess we have a new name in their (could be my not being here for 2 weeks) welcome commander lazy_man
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom