We both want the same thing - cant you just self destruct and save me 2 days of travel?
warning - griefer in Sag A*
- Thread starter CMDR DoubleSkulls
- Start date
- Status
We both want the same thing - cant you just self destruct and save me 2 days of travel?
Firstly, OP sorry to hear of this.
Thanks for the heads up on the <snip> Commander who chose to carry out this needless spineless attack.
Will keep any eye out for that flower
, or very possibly continue on my trip out in either a Private Group or Solo.
Regards
Thanks for the heads up on the <snip> Commander who chose to carry out this needless spineless attack.
Will keep any eye out for that flower
, or very possibly continue on my trip out in either a Private Group or Solo.Regards
Last edited by a moderator:
I have loved the idea of a scientific research base around Source 2, and maybe even a nav beacon "picnic spot" around Sagittarius A* itself.
However, I do support the concept of player bounties.
I don't. There is huge potential for cheating there.
Yes, well worthy of Sag A* being Sacrosanct ground so to speak
dont get me wrong, I said it was the only alternative I could think of... it's not the option I prefer lol.
That said, the idea of requiring some kind of deposit to gain entry could be good. Set at a fair level, maybe 1m?, return it when a player peacefully leaves the system, minus a 10% admin fee. If a player commits a crime, the deposit is lost, if a player is destroyed, their rebuy is covered by the pool of "admin fee's" at the core.
Frankfort
F
I had the same problem when returning to my home sytem unfortunatly for him i had reflective armour((reducing heat damage when to near to a sun)wich made his weapons use less and advanced hull integritey and 1 small mislle banks i rammed the dropship when his shields where down i destroyd him with a couple of misles .
Directed at me I take it. I don't know if you bothered with my OP. Apart from my, I would hope entirely understandable displeasure at losing 30m CR of exploration data (another 1000 jumps to earn that back, sigh), my only points are
1) be warned if you are also travelling to Sag A.
2) I wish there were better in game tools for making the consequences match the actions. For example, would Universal Cartographics take kindly to psychopaths killing explorers with valuable data? Wouldn't they put bounties out to discourage this behaviour? Shouldn't I be able to do that myself? (probably not because it would be abused by some)
For me killing others for personal benefit is acceptable. Killing others for lulz and notoriety is not. I'd like better in game mechanics to try and deal with the latter.
Yeah sounds more enjoyable then waiting around to pick off another explorer. That is unlikely now considering how much this whole thing has blown up and i got to admit i didn't plan on any sort of reaction this big. Lets hope one more little explorer wonders here that hasn't actually read this threat yet. I would like one more kill before the Calvary comes to finish me off
With the right sort of profit margins, it would make a good source of income for any station out there selling permits. Sagittarius A* can truly become a workable Tourism economy.
Nothing to see here, no crime was commited here as there is no law out there except that which you bring along with your railguns.
What constitutes as Justice relies heavily on your set of morals and your culture, and is therefore very relative. The only absolute thing about justice is that it is 'what is right', and what is right isn't absolute.
As for whether the killing of an 'innocent' trully took place, all we have are the word of some nobody who, for all we know, fumbled into a star and to avoid the shame and maybe get back into the race they were taking part in, probably paid this CMDR Rhododendron to take the blame.
For all we know this could be a ploy by the decadent pigs to send the navy and claim Sag A* for the Federation under the pretense of making it safe again.
What constitutes as Justice relies heavily on your set of morals and your culture, and is therefore very relative. The only absolute thing about justice is that it is 'what is right', and what is right isn't absolute.
As for whether the killing of an 'innocent' trully took place, all we have are the word of some nobody who, for all we know, fumbled into a star and to avoid the shame and maybe get back into the race they were taking part in, probably paid this CMDR Rhododendron to take the blame.
For all we know this could be a ploy by the decadent pigs to send the navy and claim Sag A* for the Federation under the pretense of making it safe again.
Come on own up, who fed it?
You need to link to the post, I'm not on the standard 10 posts per page.
Just got back from Sag A and never going back.
Personally, I wouldn't kill you, as that seems to be what you want.
I did and I agree with you for the most part. Killing for notoriety is a "Thing" though......
Pretty much most other peoples reactions are OTT imo. Yeah it's a big loss for you.....but you knew the risks.
Well that adds some interest to the story i must say, A little far-fetched but enjoyable to read none the less. I can assure you though CMDR DoubleSkulls did die and i was the killer. Now i await my death!
Hope no one gives you the satisfaction. Just blows your engines.
Sorry about what happened to you, but I am very much against naming and shaming. It would open a can of worms.
I am on the other hand a proponent of stopping griefing, if that was possible, so I am a bit nonplussed about your view on that.
Linked as requested
- - - Updated - - -
Helps if i link the right one :/
"Haha, yes, it was me! Now I am famous! Now I await my inevita-" <click> . . . . . .
Which is why I now propose something be done about it for what I feel is the greater benefit of all players: see later posts.
What is right to you?
Interesting theory. Do you have proof of this?
Besides, regardless of who did what to whom, my proposal stands.
- Status