(...) but if you reject then you should have some idea of what it is you are rejecting.
You seem to ask me to qualify something that I perceive as non-existent. That of course is not possible. I am not rejecting the thing itself, because to me the thing is nothing but a human construct that labels an absence.
I do however know exactly what I reject. I personally reject the
belief in the supernatural/magical because of lack of convincing reasonable evidence.
I do
not reject the supernatural itself, because to me there is nothing there to reject. It is an absence, an emptiness.
I could not qualify the supernatural, because there is nothing there... not something I personally can perceive.
Perhaps others can, but they are not very convincing to me personally to say the least.
A lot of people talk about this absence with all kinds of qualifiers, whether they are believers, meta-physicians or theologians, but the actual subject of their constructed sentences is nowhere to be perceived. When push comes to shove to me they seem to construct sentences about nothing.
Here, we are discussing the metaphysical aspects of the significance of our attitudes to living and the living condition. That is very different from Theology
Yes of course and to me it is just as problematic.
I have no idea what you are referring to if you use the word 'metaphysical'.
Of course I have a vague understanding of the concept, but to me it seems to be referring to nothing practical.
P.S.
I have constructed my sentences with the intention not to offend.
I get the feeling our minds work very differently as far as this subject is concerned.
We seem to be worlds apart.