Not sure what you want to say, but I assume you want to state that it is likely that they had taken a picture of their system from a few 100-1000ly away and thought "Wow, that looks so cool let's take this as our new logo"? Possible & I'm not against this thought. it goes along with this (quoting myself since I don't get your comment.)You know i'll screen this post, right ?
Well again, just quoting this commander ^^
Don't you remember what federation logo is?
.
Looks like Barnard's Loop. But that would be too easy, or?
View attachment 94913
It like to see it to be Trifid Nebula - just for similarity of the name to these plants
![]()
I posted an image of the logo & similarity to Bernard's Loop earlier on. But as another CMDR pointed out the bottom part is missing. I looked at the loop from different angle within the map, and with some imagination, WitchHead Nebula and maybe other nebulas e.g. Running Man (?) could fill in. I.e. the logo described a whole region aka empire?
View attachment 95101
A 2nd thought was to inverse the logo, so the C shape is actually Barnard's Loop. Rotate the right image by 180deg.
True.
& yes, Barnard's Loop is massive.
I searched for spherical nebulas and came across Abell 7. Its approximately 1800 light years away. Next to Orion.
![]()
There is a big cluster of stars towards the loop. You can't miss it. Not on the helm so can't send you a picture, and can't recall it's name ...Does anyone have advice for people searching Barnard's Loop for barnacles? I saw the speculation and took a trip out there to scout around. Here are a few things about the area:
- Do with think B-Type stars are somehow preferred, or does star type not matter?
- There are only a handful of B-type stars touching the nebula graphic so I'm wondering if the graphic is accurate or if there a proximity from the graphic on the galaxy map that counts as 'being in the nebula'?
- There are a bunch of B-Type just outside the edge of the nebula.
- Do we think that there is a certain planet composition to the placement, or a certain topology that the barnacles may be in?
- For instance, might there be a preference for mineral deposits, 100% metal worlds, or craters?
- Does distance from parent star matter?
.
However, I said earlier that Barnard's loop is massive in size. And the logo found on the BAs could points towards another nebula.
.
i'd like to think that the logo looks like the sky from their point of view. So when they look up, and flatten it to a 2D view from the top, they see a big nebula to the to the right and the smaller ones to the left. i.e. instead of trying to align the viewpoint towards Baranrd's loop that the other nebulas match, as I tried to to earlier on, I think it would be a good idea to pick a system in the center of the three nebulas larger next to next to B's loop and look from different angles to reproduce the logo. Just a thought and maybe I overthink this, but that is how I would represent my home system. How did Voyager represents did it again on the disc? Or a bit flawed, but the Nebra disk?
.
In my mind it would be too easy as a hint by to drop such a massive breadcrumb aka bread after all the challenge in the past finding the UA and BA. I don't think FD is that cheap (no offense here, mods!). Only if they want to get things rolling asap.
.
On a different note, has the Meta alloy description in the market place changed. e.g. Found in Pleiades Nebula. Or the import from info (don't know if its not bought and sold from a station if this will be the case, most likely not)?
- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -
Different race - I had the thought too. Weapon, not convinced since UAs are corrosive but don't do any real damage or do attack (us).