Has anyone found free-floating UAs outside the "shell" around Merope? If not, searching for barnacles in other nebulae seem futile. Spotting SSS is much easier then planetside structures, so someone should have stumbled on them by now.
Maybe there is no direct connection of course, but that seems doubtful now.
Yeah its definitely easier than searching planets. I'd also go so far to say that if there are other UA shells, they'd also be far easier to discover since they're not bugged. Every time I look for UAs in the right systems in the Pleiades shell, I come across at least one. There's no telling how many times other commanders flew over barnacle sites, simply not discovering them due to the bugs. So I feel it would move the searches of other nebulae along faster to look for UAs first, then go to the system they point to. And the more explorers we can then send to find barnacles, the better the chances that at least one of them will find and actually see them.
The question is "How do we determine the size of other UA shells?" I mean, would the size of the nebula change the UA shell's size? Can we expect that all barnacles and their UA offspring have life cycles that are in-sync, therefore meaning all UA shells are 135-150ly right now?
iv looked for ua shells a lot recently but alas no. i really hope its nothing todo with the barnacle site spawn problems. (is that fixed now?) other wise that was a lot of nebulas visited for nothing. Also it could be i just missed all the shells and so has everyone else? maybe.
I wouldn't expect the UAs to be experiencing the same bugs as the barnacles. I guarantee I can find a UA within a few minutes, but if I look for barnacles at a static site, maybe they'll be there, maybe not.
The spawn bug is not helping. I've spent a couple of hours checking known barnacle locations and not had a single one spawn, even in open.
FD has announced they plan on fixing that bug soon, though, right? (I think I remember reading something FD said about it, could be wrong)