The fact that CODE and SDC do not invade private groups anymore says it all.
If there was no threat of being banned, you guys would still be doing it.
Thats clear enough for me.
Um... you do realize that the only incident of Code mode invasion was like... early 2015 right? And it was put to a stop not because of any stipulation, but I put forth the agenda to outlaw it in the organization around mid-late 2015?
Oh look, no research again, how surprising.
Also, the fact that you don't hear about SDC private group invasion anymore can simply means they do not announce themselves as SDC anymore. There are plenty of ways to get around the system such as VPN and there are some people in SDC swimming in money so they don't really care about the entry price.
Not saying that it is what they are doing (I'm not SDC so I won't speak for them), but I'm stating that thinking stipulations will stop people from doing what they want to do is naive to say the least.
Seems by your tone, you support invading game modes of people trying not to play with you...I may be mistaken, but that what Im getting.
Hah... maybe one day you'll realize arguing without attaching sentiment and emotion will help you see things no longer as matter of morality but matter of legality.
I don't support mode invasion, as I've stated many times in this thread already and now I've just mentioned that I actively worked against mode invasion.
Disagreeing with something and denying something's legality and practicality are very different things, these mandatory and distinguishing factors are necessary to uphold tolerance and flexibility in societies in general.
- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -
That strikes me as just plain gullible.
It does to me, as well.