Checks for the word "honour" at elitedangerous.com. Doesn't find it.![]()
It doesn't tell you how to be a decent human being, either. It's too bad you in particular have to look at a website to find out how to do it.
Last edited:
Checks for the word "honour" at elitedangerous.com. Doesn't find it.![]()
So you lied.
Safe combat logging is a career choice now issit?I learn about a player utilizing safe combating logging that is allowed by FD's standard, but I dislike safe combat loggers, so I'll fire upon said player with a clean status or not because I dislike safe combat loggers.
Safe combat logging is a legitimate avenue of escape allowed within the game.
Can you please just examine your logic before throwing your emotion into the discussion everywhere and cloud your logic?
Also, all this kill on sight talk is very juvenile, comrades.
Safe combat logging is a career choice now issit?
You determined that was his career logically from his post asking if it was an OK tactic did you?
This must be some new meaning of the word logic I've not come across before. Sorry, you're not worth my time anymore - at least now the forum doesn't have to believe you're a legal expert anymore.
As juvenile as combat logging/safe combat logging.
It's not that the attacker could not catch the OP, it's that the OP's FSD got shot out in a Conda while the pursuer's a FDL, there's no way the Conda can get away.
The FDL most likely was enjoy his time with his prey being disabled so he stopped firing, most likely he typed something in chat, which the OP was too busy safe logging to see.
There is a reboot function if you didnt know...he just chose to log off the way the game allowed him to.
I do not agree with it...but its a valid and legit choice a player can make without breaking any rules.
You logged out of combat. You cheated.
Whether or not you care is up to you.
Don't worry OP, you lost the respect of a bunch of whiny videogamers who harass women and post hate speech for giggles. Other than that, eh, life goes on.
Shouldn't players be banned for keeping a "kill on sight" list, though? Sounds a lot like stalking and griefing to me.
Another one not familiar with legality and happily spilling extremely subjective morality all over the place, great.
Yes I have, he is not very good at escaping when the tables are turned, maybe if he spent some time practising his escape techniques instead of randomly attacking other commanders, he would not have to combat log.
To be fair FD can ban whoever they feel has broken the EULA or TOS, legality has nothing to do with it![]()
What I mean is the legality in discussion here is FD's stipulation, then people can go a step further and discuss general legality in terms of the society they reside in if they wish.
You combat log, simple as that. An hopefully he reported you for doing that. Just because you found a loophole make no difference, you combat log and deny a player a legal kill.
An Frontier can and should punish you for it.
This is pure speculation with zero evidence....The FDL most likely was enjoy his time with his prey being disabled so he stopped firing, most likely he typed something in chat, which the OP was too busy safe logging to see...
You combat log, simple as that. An hopefully he reported you for doing that. Just because you found a loophole make no difference, you combat log and deny a player a legal kill.
An Frontier can and should punish you for it.
You combat log, simple as that. An hopefully he reported you for doing that. Just because you found a loophole make no difference, you combat log and deny a player a legal kill.
An Frontier can and should punish you for it.