General / Off-Topic EU Referendum (UK only) - to Brexit or not to Brexit

Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?

  • Remain

    Votes: 155 50.2%
  • Leave

    Votes: 154 49.8%

  • Total voters
    309
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
hi spook, i was a bit paranoid about starting a flame war here so thanks for your intelligent and informative response, hope i can hold up my side ;)

The guardian article is interesting but it only really shows that people in certain areas are very disenfranchised with politics. Perhaps these areas have missed the most out of being in the EU but that is a failure of Britain not the EU, needless to say the powers that be are in no hurry to bring this to their attention. Is it in any sense true that leaving the EU is going to make any change to 'the rich get richer and the poor stay poor'?

There are other breakdowns of the voting turn out which cast a different light on it (namely the now familiar 'baby boomers broke our future' and 'Scotland didn't vote this' arguments).

'I must have missed the good bits that outweigh the pain it continues to inflict there, yet still allows people to still see it as an organization on the side of ordinary people.'

i actually think this is the greatest mistake of the remain campaign, like most (mostly) sane people anywhere i am of the opinion that overpaid bureaucrats can go boil their heads. the benefit of the EU for me IS the benefits to ordinary people: namely the ability to travel and trade freely with my neighbours which i have taken full advantage of to MY benefit, not the eurocrats. This is a very real thing which we have given up. I'm not sure i would say the EU government is an organization on the side of ordinary people but i would say being in the EU is an awesome opportunity for ordinary people. Ordinary people all across Europe are on the side of other ordinary people.

however: 'Workers rights are only any good if you're actually working, yet we see a generation of youth sacrificed on the altar of European Integration.' hmm a good point, EU is flawed and not invincible for sure and is under a lot of strain in these troubled times, but again the problems of greece are not the fault of the EU, paying more tax might have helped a bit ;)

it doesn't help that most people in UK i've met who speak of the 'pain' of the EU have too often been dictated their opinions by Nigal Farage/Rupert Murdoch et al and usually have no actual personal experience or knowledge of said 'pain'. The amount of people who asked me angrily 'do you know how much being in the EU costs us?' and didn't actually know the answer themselves (or indeed that other countries were paying more) pretty much sums it up. In fact i'm not sure pain is the right word, frustration, boredom, needless expense maybe but pain? Its hard to get a clear opinion of the impact of the EU when it has been the nations most popular scapegoat for years.

'As for the right wing/left wing stuff. I suspect the referendum vote transcended the traditional political boundaries.' i'm not sure about this; look i'm not a rabid remainer but the leave campaign is firmly connected in my head with the right wing. we voted out of the EU because 'foreigners OUT!'. anything else was just window dressing. Ever seen 'children of men'? i'm worried thats were we're going! I hope i'm wrong on this one.

'If, at some stage in the future the people of Scotland decide to travel their own path, then I can only speak for myself in that I would wish you god speed and good luck.' its probebly going to be another referendum but i'm not convinced it would be the resounding 'aye' the Sturgeon is hoping for, no EU and no UK is alot of uncertainty to get behind, good luck would be pretty much it...

cheers

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -

hi spook, i was a bit paranoid about starting a flame war here so thanks for your intelligent and informative response, hope i can hold up my side ;)

The guardian article is interesting but it only really shows that people in certain areas are very disenfranchised with politics. Perhaps these areas have missed the most out of being in the EU but that is a failure of Britain not the EU, needless to say the powers that be are in no hurry to bring this to their attention. Is it in any sense true that leaving the EU is going to make any change to 'the rich get richer and the poor stay poor'?

There are other breakdowns of the voting turn out which cast a different light on it (namely the now familiar 'baby boomers broke our future' and 'Scotland didn't vote this' arguments).

'I must have missed the good bits that outweigh the pain it continues to inflict there, yet still allows people to still see it as an organization on the side of ordinary people.'

i actually think this is the greatest mistake of the remain campaign, like most (mostly) sane people anywhere i am of the opinion that overpaid bureaucrats can go boil their heads. the benefit of the EU for me IS the benefits to ordinary people: namely the ability to travel and trade freely with my neighbours which i have taken full advantage of to MY benefit, not the eurocrats. This is a very real thing which we have given up. I'm not sure i would say the EU government is an organization on the side of ordinary people but i would say being in the EU is an awesome opportunity for ordinary people. Ordinary people all across Europe are on the side of other ordinary people.

however: 'Workers rights are only any good if you're actually working, yet we see a generation of youth sacrificed on the altar of European Integration.' hmm a good point, EU is flawed and not invincible for sure and is under a lot of strain in these troubled times, but again the problems of greece are not the fault of the EU, paying more tax might have helped a bit ;)

it doesn't help that most people in UK i've met who speak of the 'pain' of the EU have too often been dictated their opinions by Nigal Farage/Rupert Murdoch et al and usually have no actual personal experience or knowledge of said 'pain'. The amount of people who asked me angrily 'do you know how much being in the EU costs us?' and didn't actually know the answer themselves (or indeed that other countries were paying more) pretty much sums it up. In fact i'm not sure pain is the right word, frustration, boredom, needless expense maybe but pain? Its hard to get a clear opinion of the impact of the EU when it has been the nations most popular scapegoat for years.

'As for the right wing/left wing stuff. I suspect the referendum vote transcended the traditional political boundaries.' i'm not sure about this; look i'm not a rabid remainer but the leave campaign is firmly connected in my head with the right wing. we voted out of the EU because 'foreigners OUT!'. anything else was just window dressing. Ever seen 'children of men'? i'm worried thats were we're going! I hope i'm wrong on this one.

'If, at some stage in the future the people of Scotland decide to travel their own path, then I can only speak for myself in that I would wish you god speed and good luck.' its probebly going to be another referendum but i'm not convinced it would be the resounding 'aye' the Sturgeon is hoping for, no EU and no UK is alot of uncertainty to get behind, good luck would be pretty much it...

cheers
 

Minonian

Banned
Doesn't matter we already signed the treaty, if they change the law it effects only those nations that sign up to the EU after the law changes. This is how all contracts work :)

Uk will still have legal ground to say they broke the agreement they signed and sue for trillions in lost trade over decades.

Wrong. :) The threaty is between EU members, if UK quits, than it's loses effects because the conditions are no longer valid.

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -


keep saying it not makes it true.
 
The EU's £1TRILLION plans kept secret until AFTER the referendum.

Brussels leaders set out their new military strategy, an EU army, Where all nations forces join one EU force and that force will get its orders from Brussels.

Another lie the EU told us would never happen.



http://www.express.co.uk/news/world...raffic.outbrain&utm_campaign=traffic.outbrain

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -



Yes it is, they want a federal Europe, where all countries within the EU strip national identity and join the Eu. NO THANKS.

Look what they did to Greece, give the EU an army, weapons, and they will start marching in to EU areas threating people to their will.

And since this was written in the UKIP tabloid Daily Express you know it must be true!
 
Wrong. :) The threaty is between EU members, if UK quits, than it's loses effects because the conditions are no longer valid.

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -



keep saying it not makes it true.

Incorrect again for the third time read article 50 of the lisbon treaty and stop making things up as you go.Your showing your age ;)

Article 50

1. Any Member State may decide to withdraw from the Union in accordance with its own constitutional requirements.

2. A Member State which decides to withdraw shall notify the European Council of its intention. In the light of the guidelines provided by the European Council, the Union shall negotiate and conclude an agreement with that State, setting out the arrangements for its withdrawal, taking account of the framework for its future relationship with the Union. That agreement shall be negotiated in accordance with Article 218(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. It shall be concluded on behalf of the Union by the Council, acting by a qualified majority, after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament.

3. The Treaties shall cease to apply to the State in question from the date of entry into force of the withdrawal agreement or, failing that, two years after the notification referred to in paragraph 2, unless the European Council, in agreement with the Member State concerned, unanimously decides to extend this period.

4. For the purposes of paragraphs 2 and 3, the member of the European Council or of the Council representing the withdrawing Member State shall not participate in the discussions of the European Council or Council or in decisions concerning it.

A qualified majority shall be defined in accordance with Article 238(3)(b) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

5. If a State which has withdrawn from the Union asks to rejoin, its request shall be subject to the procedure referred to in Article 49.

http://www.lisbon-treaty.org/wcm/th.../title-6-final-provisions/137-article-50.html
 
Last edited:
This is why Brussels should stop acting like a child throwing a tantrum in a pram. If they think they can bully UK, UK will shock them again by standing their ground, as our history shows we never bow to bullies and so drag this out to the letter of the law of 2 years.

Nationalist nonsense blustering. Do you think it's a good idea to burn even more bridges and create more resentment by trying to drag out the process? You voted, now take the consequences. Show some dignity at this point at least.
 
And since this was written in the UKIP tabloid Daily Express you know it must be true!

Yeah, you and others seem to have no trust in newpapers, yet you get your information from somewhere that you trust, so name it? Or are you just trolling ?
 
Last edited:

Minonian

Banned
Incorrect again for the third time read article 50 of the lisbon treaty and stop making things up as you go.Your showing your age ;)

Is that so? :D

"3. The Treaties shall cease to apply to the State in question"

And everything else is about the future negotiations, if there is any.
 
Yeah, you and others seem to have no trust in newpapers, yet you get you information from somewhere that you trust, so name it?
I personally have a severe mistrust of the media in general, far too many times have I seen a blatant disregard for the truth over sensationalism .. The fact that everyone in this thread has the internet means that looking into actual documentation and factual statistics is generally easy, like I said earlier some people like to be told what to think rather than seeking out the truth (not pointed at anyone here)
 
Last edited:

Yaffle

Volunteer Moderator
I think, but I do not speak for him/her, that Adept meant that Wilders does not speak for all of the Netherlands, just his political party.
 
Is that so? :D

"3. The Treaties shall cease to apply to the State in question"

And everything else is about the future negotiations, if there is any.


For the 4th time read the article it says:

The Treaties shall cease to apply to the State in question from the date of entry into force of the withdrawal agreement or, failing that, two years after the notification referred to in paragraph 2, unless the European Council, in agreement with the Member State concerned, unanimously decides to extend this period.


The clue is in the letters that make up words that create sentences. (Ok you may be learning English and i accept you do not understand what it says)
 
Last edited:

Minonian

Banned
I think, but I do not speak for him/her, that Adept meant that Wilders does not speak for all of the Netherlands, just his political party.

It does not matter what the quitters saying the UK have 2 choice, leave and disintegrate into nothing, or stay.

And that's all they got.
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom