Senior positions tends to imply that they're looking for experience (and are willing to pay appropriately). I think it's more about setting expectations for the job than anything else.
The Star Citizen Thread v5
- Thread starter Brett C
- Start date
- Status
Senior positions tends to imply that they're looking for experience (and are willing to pay appropriately). I think it's more about setting expectations for the job than anything else.
Yeah in my experience Senior just means, have experience. It's like the opposite of Junior.
Some of them act like religious zealots. I don't know if it's the deep need to believe, or the money involved... Either way, admitting you are wrong is always hard, but it is also liberating.
I can't believe how low some people can go over a videogame. Pathetic really.
This style argumentation is what people defending cig should be using. I have to say that your explanation does make sense and its completely valid.Senior positions tends to imply that they're looking for experience (and are willing to pay appropriately). I think it's more about setting expectations for the job than anything else.
Yeah, funny that....
- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -
Why would you think that?
That, or they're planning on opening up an office in Bogotá, but haven't figured out how to put virgulillas on top of their n:s.
Any Developer who can put two and two together and get four will know it's time to jump ship and find something worth spending your time on.
Everyone in the Business are laughing at CIG, and they are doing it out loud!
Last edited:
Because unlike managers, they're the ones who actually deliver the product.
So you've never been involved in game design then?
- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -
Speaking from experience I'm going to assume here?
Well I'm currently in a job that has me see challenging times coming our way, and some people here are busy inventing a device called W.H.E.E.L. which is so innovative that we can't use anything on the market, we HAVE to do it ourselves. And I'm seeing the first releases of W.H.E.E.L. and it's a sad mess written by a bunch of graduates fresh off university. The reason I'm still here is 1) I still hope to help turn things around in time and 2) the pay is alright. Inertia can be a big factor for people staying.
From the comment section of the Jeffrey McArthur video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cc7o-uDmvio
Some of the more severe comments to which my quote was a response to have since been deleted or edited. But yeah, so toxic, this thread...
- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -
Why do you ask? We all know that if he responds "yes" you're either dismiss any qualification he lists as false, or you proceed to proclaim that CIG's game development can't really be compared to any other game development because "scope" and "fidelity" and "never been done before in this combination". And all these points will be debunked with references, just like the whole point about the history of Chris Roberts. And a year from now we'll be in the Star Citizen Thread v6 and someone else will come in and start the same discussion with the same disproven points.
Where's the last guy who asked for sources regarding CR's past projects? Been all quiet since. Probably waiting until it's a few dozen pages later so he can post the same stuff again without having to fear someone easily finding the facts countering him.
I've got experience in laughing out loud if that helps?
I was making a point that nobody is qualified to say anything since they have no data on which to draw conclusions. You can stroke your ego if you want, I prefer to work with facts. Some people here though think that if you can add 2 + 2 and get 4.....
So you don't have anything remotely resembling an argument, then?
So you don't have anything remotely resembling an argument, then?
I seem to recall a Monty Python sketch... "This isn't an argument, it is just a series of contradictory statements"...
"No it isn't!"
"No it isn't!"
The fact of the matter is that, to get things done — to deliver the product — you need people who do the actual job of getting things done, not managers.
And no, you were not making a point. You were constructing a classic ad hominem + appeal to authority fallacy.
Last edited:
I was making a point that nobody is qualified to say anything since they have no data on which to draw conclusions. You can stroke your ego if you want, I prefer to work with facts. Some people here though think that if you can add 2 + 2 and get 4.....
Perhaps you could outline your qualifications so we can assess your suitability to assess the quality of other people's comments!
Sooo, anyone know when the Avocados get 2.6 to play with? Staaaaaaaaaaaaaaar Marine... (Like Khan but with a better cover system)
No one is qualified to say.
Are you qualified to say that no-one is qualified to say, or are you simply assuming that?...
Credentialism — the silent killer.
- Status