The Star Citizen Thread v5

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Let me guess? That is also new and has never been done before?


Let me guess? That is also new and has never been done before?

Not in Star Citizen, at least I haven't seen any VoIP option yet. Rumour is that they are trying to blend in VoIP and accurate facial animations.

WP5nhGy.gif


https://gfycat.com/IllustriousImpishBream

Why should people that post news and media about Star Citizen be ostracised here?
Isn't this the » Off-Topic / General Gaming Discussion / Space/SciFi Games / The Star Citizen Thread v5 ??

Do I need to remind you that the owner of this company and forum is a avid supporter of both Chris Roberts and Star Citizen?

Geez this is a game not a war [wacko]
 
The sort of posts that Orlando does in that example just reinforces the negativity towards the project and is self defeating.

I'm not sure if any of them have finally worked that out.

It goes like this;

Someone (sometimes me) make a lame joke/pith taking comment.

Most people would see it for what it was and disregard.

Then megafan/shill enters stage left and makes some ludicrous comment about saving PC gaming/Visions or some other patently obvious .

This triggers some people who go into serious post mode and really ram the point home with a mini essay and supporting links and stuff.

The original throw away pith taking comment suddenly doesn't look so silly anymore as lots more unknown info (especially to me) is suddenly revealed.

And round it goes.

I keep thinking they must figure it out sooner or later but no - it seems..
 
Last edited:
With SC we just never get the facts.



A cursory look anywhere Space Game related will provide thousands upon thousands of examples. SC itself is either fake, or lies or anything other then what it is...unreleased.

A cursory look anywhere, is not a good sign. Provide me with facts and examples. Because as i continue to see them provide me with builds and updated game play and releases, as they are released. Something they stated they would do from the beginning. I don't see any lies or fakery when i'm actually playing it. You don't load up, move around and play lies.
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure if any of them have finally worked that out.

It goes like this;

Someone (sometimes me) make a lame joke/pith taking comment.

Most people would see it for what it was and disregard.

Then megafan/shill enters stage left and makes some ludicrous comment about saving PC gaming/Visions or some other patently obvious .

This triggers some people who go into serious post mode and really ram the point home with a mini essay and supporting links and stuff.

The original throw away pith taking comment suddenly doesn't look so silly anymore as lots more unknown info (especially to me) i suddenly revealed.

And round it goes.

I keep thinking they must figure it out sooner or late but no - it seems..

In short, from my point of view what we have here is some not really positively interested in seeing the game succeed while constantly taking <SFE> of the ones that are. In the thread made purposely to discuss said game. Seems like a case of "stop liking what I don't like or Ill troll you" [big grin]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not in Star Citizen, at least I haven't seen any VoIP option yet. Rumour is that they are trying to blend in VoIP and accurate facial animations.
People have been using VoIP with Star Citizen for years, you know…

Why should people that post news and media about Star Citizen be ostracised here?
Because they keep being disingenuous to the point of outright lies in the way they present said “news”.
 
Not in Star Citizen, at least I haven't seen any VoIP option yet. Rumour is that they are trying to blend in VoIP and accurate facial animations.

Geez this is a game not a war [wacko]

HAHAHAHA!! Right, lets see how they do with trying to get a system that works with the countless accents and brouges that exist shall we? Yeah, that's just not going to work at all. At best everyone will be pulling their 'dump' face when talking in anything other than either Queens English or Cali American, there are very good reasons why no one else has bothered trying this.

It's not even a game dude.
 
A cursory look anywhere, is not a good sign. Provide me with facts and examples. Because as i continue to see them provide me with builds and updated game play and releases, as they are released. Something they stated they would do from the beginning. I don't see any lies or fakery when i'm actually playing it. You don't load up, move around and play lies.

I suggest you ask our good friend Orlando for facts and examples - I honestly don't have the heart to go trawling through release notes, youtube, my own screenshots etc on a Friday night and waste precious beer when I laugh :D
 
People have been using VoIP with Star Citizen for years, you know…


It's not the kind of VoIP you think it is. It's something that is directly connect to the character animations, it's similar to the webcam rig system twitch users apply. When they don't want to show their faces.


Because they keep being disingenuous to the point of outright lies in the way they present said “news”.

How should they present said new? you just don't like the information provided because it doesn't fit the agenda here.
 
I suggest you ask our good friend Orlando for facts and examples - I honestly don't have the heart to go trawling through release notes, youtube, my own screenshots etc on a Friday night and waste precious beer when I laugh :D

Let me see those screenshots then? hit me up. Don't talk smoke and pixie dust give me fire and let me see it with my own eyes. Otherwise you're a chariot without a master.

Without misrepresentation and lies, preferably.

What are these lies and misrepresentations? don't put out blanket statements.
 
Last edited:
Let me see those screenshots then? hit me up. Don't talk smoke and pixie dust give me fire and let me see it with my own eyes. Otherwise you're a chariot without a master.

You must have me mistaken with someone else. It's Major Tom who does the chariot stuff :)

Oh, and unless you are on triple-head my screenshots will be a bit awkward for you.
 
People have been using VoIP with Star Citizen for years, you know…
Because they keep being disingenuous to the point of outright lies in the way they present said “news”.

Hehehe "being disingenuous to the point of outright lies in the way they present said “news”." seems such a familiar modus operandi to some here, It's laughable that you bring it up, from all the people. Please post more edited youtube clips to prove that righteous point... [rolleyes]

PS-
Anything by CCP, Naughty Dog, Bethesda, Electronic Arts, Epic, Ubisoft, or Activision should do.
Please do link only the very best live demo gameplays that, in your opinion, surpass CIG Gamescom Demo, please.
Still waiting...
 
In short, from my point of view what we have here is some not really positively interested in seeing the game succeed while constantly taking the p1ss of the ones that are. In the thread made purposely to discuss said game. Seems like a case of "stop liking what I don't like or Ill troll you" [big grin]

But we are discussing the game - just not in a way that you approve of.

I mean I understand the arguing on the internet thing - which is a lot of what this is about - but why does it matter so much to you that someone doesn't like what you like?

None of this changes the state of SC/SQ42 in any way - if it's going to succeed then a handful of people on an unrelated forum can't change that. If on the other hand it's going to fail - or more likely - end up being a bit mediocre (having missed it's window of opportunity to impress by years) nothing any of us says will change that either.

So what's the problem?
 
How should they present said new? you just don't like the information provided because it doesn't fit the agenda here.

Persecution complex much, there is no collective agenda here. Some people do have an axe to grind with it, but most just call it as they see it and have a bit of a laugh so lighten up.
 
Last edited:
But we are discussing the game - just not in a way that you approve of.

I mean I understand the arguing on the internet thing - which is a lot of what this is about - but why does it matter so much to you that someone doesn't like what you like?

None of this changes the state of SC/SQ42 in any way - if it's going to succeed then a handful of people on an unrelated forum can't change that. If on the other hand it's going to fail - or more likely - end up being a bit mediocre (having missed it's window of opportunity to impress by years) nothing any of us says will change that either.

So what's the problem?

Did I raised any problem? I was mentioned that it was funny being jumped (again) for posting news and media about the game in the thread dedicated to exactly that. ;)
 
You must have me mistaken with someone else. It's Major Tom who does the chariot stuff :)

Oh, and unless you are on triple-head my screenshots will be a bit awkward for you.

So you have nothing gotcha. Why blow smoke if you have nothing to back it up with? makes you untrustworthy and maybe that doesn't matter coming from an "enemy" which laughable.


We got a good amount of real ones off the internet.
 
In short, from my point of view what we have here is some not really positively interested in seeing the game succeed while constantly taking the p1ss of the ones that are. In the thread made purposely to discuss said game. Seems like a case of "stop liking what I don't like or Ill troll you" [big grin]

Like it all you want Orlando no one minds that. Your ramming it's "brilliance" and all that jazz down people's throats with your religious zeal, 90% of it all based on nothing but faith and jpegs. The rest of us here have either played it and found it utter unprogressive rubbish and/or have no faith in CR and his strange way of getting this game out mostly based on his very suspect track record.

We don't get up Rolan about his obvious desire for this game you'll notice. It's just the likes of you and John mice and the others that get banned round here.
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom