Yes.
Although it's usually a lot more subtle than that, like ignoring specifics.
I've had a lot of fun arguing with religious folks. It's educational.
The Star Citizen Thread v5
- Thread starter Brett C
- Start date
- Status
Yes.
Although it's usually a lot more subtle than that, like ignoring specifics.
I've had a lot of fun arguing with religious folks. It's educational.
...and why exactly do we all need to know about your deep seated hatred towards CR?
I mean, come on, you're not the only one who can 'paraphrase'.
- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -
It's never very subtle here.
I have been asking this question to the thread myself, I dont seem to having any more luck getting an answer than you have.
You aren't even trying.
Do you believe that the MVP, shopped around by CR, is something we should treat as a possible reality? Do you understand the ramifications of calling something MVP?
I don't believe anyone comes here to talk about SC earnestly.
But then why are you here?
Or as a example ED was by definition a MVP. Shocking for some people including myself, at that time. But ED did go a long way.
MVP for SC is not defined..and wasnt planned in the beginning. They wanted to deliver "everything" at their release, icludign 100 systems or so if i remember correctly.
What would happen if Alpha 3.0...is MVP 1.0 that would be a hard crash.
I'm used to it.
I've tried engaging him several times...there was one glimmer of hope some number of bans ago. I still believe he can have a reasoned conversation. If, at least, for a moment.
Oh, actually it is.
It's addressing specific parts of a post and claiming victory while ignoring blockers.
There is nothing to talk about SC earnestly. SC is making it to easy to make fun out of them...well they started it in the first place with those overblown claims.
What you believe doesn't matter.
I don't know if you have paid attention, but I've been out playing in the PU with Mr. Nowak, I'm genuinely interested in seeing this project succeed. You can ask him.
I will not relent on my criticism, however. And when it comes to blind boostering, I'm gonna call it out.
At what point do you think it's reasonable to say that full scale development is under way for a game of this magnitude?
Well, how does anyone define 'full-scale'? We have no reference point for this, only Chris's own word that it started in 2011. But I guess if you want 'full-scale', that allows you to shift the definition to whatever you want. So what is your definition?
When the guy in charge says so is a good marker.
What does full scale development mean?
Is that, all core features are being worked on? Or does it mean they are staffed and ready to hit the pavement?
So that in the end we can discover it's all down to me being angry with my dad and I drive off into the sunset with Minnie Driver.
2020 - 2025? Pretty much whatever Chris thinks needs it to be depending on whoever he's talking to at the time.
To me - and others it would seem - have working networking code - maybe (don't expect too much!) - to support more than 24 players 5 years after you were sounding off about up to 100 players playing together doesn't sound like progress.
It sounds like one of the first things you should nail down - before shirts and stuff.
Magnitude and scope doesn't come into it - networking is the same regardless.
I expect for similar reasons as everyone else. Entertainment.
I get where you're coming from but I'm of an age where I'd rather drive off with a decent bottle of wine and a book...
[uhh]
So.... then according to you..... your assessment of SC being 5 years into development is false.....
- Status