The Star Citizen Thread v5

[Stigbob]

oh oh. Pleeease do not compare those two games. Thats really low level man

That's true the NMS fans who lost it in a crazy way had been promised a lot less than the citizens. They'd also spent a lot less money on it.

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -

Oh man you loaded your post with so much hyperbole I had to trim it down to the relevant bit. The patches released so far have not been intended to "finally fix it all." That has always been 3.0. The patches released this year were simply meant to add content to the PU, which they did.

And please provide a source for 3.0 being delayed.

The leaky avocado's.

 

[Atres Alfahan]

Umm.. still not what is planned for release. Or was planned for release. Yeah, i get you have a limited playground now for your ships, same as we had in beta for ED. But you saying that 4 out of 6 things have been delivered, the 2 missing not being the game, is really misleading.

The actual game is still missing. That was my point.

Unless you wish to equate the current state of the game with what is planned for release, in which case..... umm..... no, not even going there.

This is correct the game is still pending delivery / in development.

If you think I am part of CIG and know the stuff I have to disappoint you here. I work for a different game publisher and have no connection to CIG beside of being a backer of the project.
Therefore all I can tell you about upcoming releases and developments is speculation and reference on already official statements. And of course my own humble opinion and guess so please take this with a grain of salt.

 

[idkmybffjill]

The leaky avocado's.

LOL. 3.0 is no where near the Evocati. They'd have 2.6 in their hands well before 3.0. Which they don't yet, every Evocati "leak" gas been proven false.

So, again, please provide a source.

 

[Komemiute]

Ohh, you guys will all end up playing this game as soon as it gets some more mechanics
But at this time most of you will think "well, think I was wrong..." But thats okay

It really depends how many more season of content FD will bring to Elite. SO far every major patch really really brought in massive addition.
In a year and a half it's going to be damn tough to reach- factoring in months and patches of polishig and refining which have been consistently being delivered so far...

 

[Tuub t Tute]

Oh man you loaded your post with so much hyperbole I had to trim it down to the relevant bit. The patches released so far have not been intended to "finally fix it all." That has always been 3.0. The patches released this year were simply meant to add content to the PU, which they did.

And please provide a source for 3.0 being delayed.

Umm, it can't be "always", because 2.7 only transmogrified into 3.0 at Gamescom? I know I am being picky, but sometimes I feel like I'm reading a Gantt chart made up of wibbly wobbly timey wimey stuff :/

 

[MarktJones]

That's true the NMS fans who lost it in a crazy way had been promised a lot less than the citizens. They'd also spent a lot less money on it.

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -



The leaky avocado's.

2.6 is delayed, we're just inferring from that that they'll be a knock on delay to 3.0. unless there's been another update leak?

 

[lysan]

That's exactly it!
I've been trying to figure out what's wrong with skin movement and you nailed it.
It's most prominent from 1:49 onward, on the female petty officer model.
Looks unnatural and still COD Infinite Warfare beats it.

I think someone should inform CR that there are 40+ facial muscles, then sit back and enjoy the show as he tries to simulate and refactor them all to infinity.

Not only that, they did it for a lot less than fidelity mouse did....

and again nothing new in this, but we all know that CR and CIG invented everything LMAO

[video=youtube;fBR4cT-0sKY]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fBR4cT-0sKY[/video]
Oh 2011 if anyone wonder...

 

[Stigbob]

2.6 is delayed, we're just inferring from that that they'll be a knock on delay to 3.0. unless there's been another update leak?

Maybe we should just apply Occams razor.

Everything CiG ever do is badly delayed and shoddy-no assumptions simply factual.

This time it's different for reasons-lots of assumptions.

It's gonna be delayed.

 

[MarktJones]

Maybe we should just apply Occams razor.

Everything CiG ever do is badly delayed and shoddy-no assumptions simply factual.

This time it's different for reasons-lots of assumptions.

It's gonna be delayed.

Oh I expect it to be delayed for that very reason!

But no one has said anything about 3.0 mainly because they are still struggling with the much simpler 2.6 patch...

 

[jinto777]

http://i.imgur.com/V9fBO0I.png

Not the first thing they "forgot" about, and not the last thing either.

Actually, he said this may be possible:

"So, we definitely could scan some backers out there who would have to have a full rig setup."


" At the same time if we’ve got Foundry 42 crew people or people from over here in LA or people from Imaginarium and they want to appear in the game, we scan them too. So, not out of the realm of possibility to have a set up somewhere and a few lucky backers…"

Source: http://imperialnews.network/2016/09/10-for-the-chairman-special-edition/

 

[lysan]

Careful. The NMS fanboys said the same thing. Didn't turn out so great for them.

nope, now there is SC back the shiny beacon of space games.....

 

[Insignificant_The_Galaxy_Cat]

LOL. 3.0 is no where near the Evocati. They'd have 2.6 in their hands well before 3.0. Which they don't yet, every Evocati "leak" gas been proven false.

So, again, please provide a source.

No no no. You fail to understand Stig's point (as per usual).

The point being that 2.6 Evocati testing phase has been pushed back so far that the likelihood of 3.0 releasing this year has effectively gone out of the window.

That is what the leaked info was alluding to.

Also, can you confirm that "every Evocati leak has been proven false" please? Examples and links would be most appreciated thanks.

 

[Toumal]

Oh man you loaded your post with so much hyperbole I had to trim it down to the relevant bit. The patches released so far have not been intended to "finally fix it all."

Putting fingers into your ears and yelling "NEENEERNEENER" won't make facts go away, especially not official CIG communications.

That has always been 3.0.

Same was said by guys like you about 2.1, 2.4, etc.

And please provide a source for 3.0 being delayed.

Read my previous posts. I put a link there. Of course that information was "not to be shared yet" beyond Evocati circles. Probably because they know you guys would freak out.

EDIT: And yeah the delay was implied, but don't believe it's really possible to go from 2.6 to 3.0 within one month.

 

[Frank]

And yet plenty of new people post on the sub-reddit all the time talking about how great the community is. Some people even decide to back because of how helpful the community is.

Then there's also posts that have been making it to the top of the sub that criticize aspects of the game.

But see, these things contradict your narrative, so we don't talk about them.

Of course you are right. I've updated my joke to take what you said into consideration...

The rabid fans do appear to be getting worse. It makes you wonder what the forums would be like if they get their way...

"Star Citizen what a great game"

"Yes. It certainly is... The community is so great as well And have nothing bad to say about it. "

"Me neither. I think it's a wonderful game. Isn't it perfect?"

"Yes it is perfect. Please don't jump down my throat because I only said there was nothing bad about it and didn't state how incredibly fantastic I think the game is..

When I say I think the game is fantastic of course there no subjectivity needed. It's a matter of fact that it is fantastic. I've been a follower since the kickstarter days and have contributed to the game's development for decades now.. Please stop sending me death threats."

 

[Insignificant_The_Galaxy_Cat]

This is correct the game is still pending delivery / in development.

If you think I am part of CIG and know the stuff I have to disappoint you here. I work for a different game publisher and have no connection to CIG beside of being a backer of the project.
Therefore all I can tell you about upcoming releases and developments is speculation and reference on already official statements. And of course my own humble opinion and guess so please take this with a grain of salt.

So basically you are speculating just as much as the hated Smart is (allegedly).

In that case, why is his version of speculating about Star Citizen's "progress" *wrong*, yet your own self-admitted guesswork is apparently *correct*?

Also, I don't know what (reputation management) development company you are working for is, but I think that they might not be getting their value for money from your services to them.

 

[idkmybffjill]

Yep Ed's a successfully released highly regarded game whereas Star Citizens probably gonna crash and burn and might take crowdfunding with it.

100% unrelated to the point that I made. Also, your predictions are summed up as follows; "probably," "might." Nothing but conjecture.

You've been promised some stuff by a company with an extremely dubious track record on delivery, don't hold your breath or expect any of it to actually be delivered.

There has been no significant progress in SC at all other than the rewritten TOS that leaves you open to lose your money and receive nothing in return.

More conjecture and unsubstantiated opinion. Again, they have delivered before on their milestones, the most recent being 2.0, which was released as demo'd months before.

It wasn't supposedly cancelled the chairman said it was already in the game. How can he now be delivering it if it's already in the game.

Or do you think just maybe it's marketing rubbish to part rubes from their money and you are about to be disappointed again.

Forever misquoting CR to fit your agenda. He never said it was in the game, he was referring to FPS mechanics being in the PU already for testing, thus the FPS testbed that was meant to be Star Marine got pushed back.

Umm, it can't be "always", because 2.7 only transmogrified into 3.0 at Gamescom? I know I am being picky, but sometimes I feel like I'm reading a Gantt chart made up of wibbly wobbly timey wimey stuff :/

Yes, 2.7 was regarded as the patch to fix everything before Gamescom. They then renamed it to 3.0. It's always been the same patch, just new designation.

Maybe we should just apply Occams razor.

Everything CiG ever do is badly delayed and shoddy-no assumptions simply factual.

This time it's different for reasons-lots of assumptions.

It's gonna be delayed.

Aaaand more conjecture.

 

[Soliluna]

100% unrelated to the point that I made. Also, your predictions are summed up as follows; "probably," "might." Nothing but conjecture.

More conjecture and unsubstantiated opinion. Again, they have delivered before on their milestones, the most recent being 2.0, which was released as demo'd months before.


Forever misquoting CR to fit your agenda. He never said it was in the game, he was referring to FPS mechanics being in the PU already for testing, thus the FPS testbed that was meant to be Star Marine got pushed back.


Yes, 2.7 was regarded as the patch to fix everything before Gamescom. They then renamed it to 3.0. It's always been the same patch, just new designation.


Aaaand more conjecture.

Sorry, I asked a couple of pages ago now and it must have been missed.

You said the community has always known what the MVP was. Could you please define what the MVP is, what features will be included at release and what features will not. Also, if you could source the information it would be great, unfortunately, you just seem to be disagreeing with people hostilely without actually providing any information or facts to the discussion.

Which makes this post ironic. More importantly it makes the discussion stale.

 

[Marak]

Will we still be able to go into space in our underpants in 3.0?

I hope they don't fix that, it gives a strange sense of freedom.

 

[idkmybffjill]

Putting fingers into your ears and yelling "NEENEERNEENER" won't make facts go away, especially not official CIG communications. Same was said by guys like you about 2.1, 2.4, etc.

They've done what they can every patch to make frames as managable as possible leading up to 3.0. Still no patch has been lauded as the patch to fix everything other than 3.0. If you can prove otherwise, by all means do so. But I see no proof yet.

Read my previous posts. I put a link there. Of course that information was "not to be shared yet" beyond Evocati circles. Probably because they know you guys would freak out.

Provide a source if you're going to use it in your argument. And as I've already stated, any recent supposed "leaks" have been proven to be false.

EDIT: And yeah the delay was implied, but don't believe it's really possible to go from 2.6 to 3.0 within one month.

3 months left in this year. Even if 3.0 comes out January or February of next year it won't matter at all. You'll have your fun with it being delayed for a month or two, and then we'll have it in our hands and landing on planets with better framerate and stability will quickly make the wait worth it.

 

[Komemiute]

3 months left in this year. Even if 3.0 comes out January or February of next year it won't matter at all. You'll have your fun with it being delayed for a month or two, and then we'll have it in our hands and landing on planets with better framerate and stability will quickly make the wait worth it.

Ok, sooo- let me jab this at you.
Should 3.0 be any later than February- what would you say?