I have finally decided to jump in to the mystery side of ED, and have began analyzing my sound files taken from the obelisk that is positioned in the following cluster:
http://www.carbryck.com/EDSCREENS/Obelisk_Cluster.jpg
I'm not too bad at pattern recognition, but not so good a maths. I think you need to be good at both these things to solve these kind of puzzles. So I haven't attempted to de-crypt any of this yet, I just feel that there are some details that have gone unnoticed so far, that may or may not be relevant.
I was trying to get an hour long recording, but the game crashed after 46 minutes, so I went with what I had after first trying to analyze just a ten minute sample.
So really I'm just trying to describe things as I see them, from my own point of view rather than try to decode any of this.
First of all the audio loop in the waveform appears to be 2:51.4 minutes long and repeats indefinitely, you can clearly observe this graphically in the following image:
http://www.carbryck.com/EDSCREENS/Waveform_01.jpg
Secondly I could not detect any repeated signal component sets in the 46 minute recording. Is it supposed to repeat after one hour? Did I read that somewhere? Well anyway from the data I have each signal component set seems unique, and they vary from just a handful of bars up to several dozen. Each component set seems to reside within a single audio loop, never do you get two component sets within a single audio loop parameter.
Here are 18 signal component sets cut out of the file, and presented in the order that they were recorded:
http://www.carbryck.com/EDSCREENS/18_Signal_Components.jpg
Observational notes:
There are six individually unique types of bar component. For descriptive purposes I have chosen the following nomenclature, indicated here in the following images:
SHORT TOP DOUBLE BAR:
http://www.carbryck.com/EDSCREENS/Short_Top_Double_Bar.jpg
This when we look closely is not just a single block, but is composed of two parts.
WIDE BOTTOM BAR
TABBED TALL BAR
http://www.carbryck.com/EDSCREENS/Tabbed_Tall_Bar_and_Wide_Bottom_Bar.jpg
The WIDE BOTTOM BAR is the only component that is genuinely solid. TABBED TALL BAR has a small tab at it's top right corner.
DEEP SLIM TABBED DOUBLE BAR
SLIM DOUBLE TABBED END BAR
http://www.carbryck.com/EDSCREENS/Deep_Slim_Tabbed_Double_Bar_and_Slim_Double_Tabbed_End_Bar.jpg
DEEP SLIM is tabbed on the top right hand bar segment and reaches down below 8KHz. None of the other bar components do this.
SLIM DOUBLE TABBED is as described. It has two tabs on each of its bar segments. Also it appears to be part of some kind of footer to indicate the end of that component set.
TABBED BIG END BAR
http://www.carbryck.com/EDSCREENS/Tabbed_Big_End_Bar.jpg
Again as I'm sure everyone has already noticed this component indicates the end of the component set, and seems to be paired with the SLIM DOUBLE TABBED END BAR. These two components are always indicating some kind of component set footer and are always the same distance apart. This component bar actually has five tabs in total, one of which is very faint, but still definitely present.
http://www.carbryck.com/EDSCREENS/End_Bars_Distance.jpg
Time distances between component bars in a set seems to vary considerably, and must surely be a factor to consider. Also the tabs on the top of most of the component bars must also surely bare some kind of significance. If the creators of this puzzle wanted to make plain solid bars, I'm sure they would have done so.
Sorry if this makes things more complicated! And also sorry that I have no input regarding solving the puzzle, although I think we can gather from the style of the ruins that this particular mystery probably has nothing to do with the previous UA/UP/Thargoids mysteries and perhaps should be considered a separate entity.
My ASP is currently parked up at the Ruins and I intend to gather more recordings from all of the Obelisks over the next few days. But I don't think I'm capable of actually solving a puzzle like this.
Additional EDIT: Now that I've got more up to date with the discussion here, which everyone seemed to be posting whilst I was preparing this post! - My opinion of the carrier wave signal idea, (which I would never have thought of, even though I am familiar with FM synthesis) - I'm not convinced that it is any carrier wave signal. Looks to me more like part of the audio loop file. If you have a look at the 18 signal component sets link above it seems that the proposed carrier signal coincides heavily with the rest of the lower frequency sounds below. Also it is not solely present between the two footer bars, but throughout the spectrograph component sets, and indeed can also be found where there is no 'information'. Unless the audio file itself is a carrier wave? But how to isolate the specific sound? I wouldn't know how to do that.
Going by what people are saying I think I would probably go along with the theory that this could just be a red herring/dead end type thing, because of the seemingly random endless nature of the 'information'. Either that or it's way more complex, such as has been suggested that the added information placed inside each sample loop is based of environmental influences, which would be interesting.
- Si
http://www.carbryck.com/EDSCREENS/Obelisk_Cluster.jpg
I'm not too bad at pattern recognition, but not so good a maths. I think you need to be good at both these things to solve these kind of puzzles. So I haven't attempted to de-crypt any of this yet, I just feel that there are some details that have gone unnoticed so far, that may or may not be relevant.
I was trying to get an hour long recording, but the game crashed after 46 minutes, so I went with what I had after first trying to analyze just a ten minute sample.
So really I'm just trying to describe things as I see them, from my own point of view rather than try to decode any of this.
First of all the audio loop in the waveform appears to be 2:51.4 minutes long and repeats indefinitely, you can clearly observe this graphically in the following image:
http://www.carbryck.com/EDSCREENS/Waveform_01.jpg
Secondly I could not detect any repeated signal component sets in the 46 minute recording. Is it supposed to repeat after one hour? Did I read that somewhere? Well anyway from the data I have each signal component set seems unique, and they vary from just a handful of bars up to several dozen. Each component set seems to reside within a single audio loop, never do you get two component sets within a single audio loop parameter.
Here are 18 signal component sets cut out of the file, and presented in the order that they were recorded:
http://www.carbryck.com/EDSCREENS/18_Signal_Components.jpg
Observational notes:
There are six individually unique types of bar component. For descriptive purposes I have chosen the following nomenclature, indicated here in the following images:
SHORT TOP DOUBLE BAR:
http://www.carbryck.com/EDSCREENS/Short_Top_Double_Bar.jpg
This when we look closely is not just a single block, but is composed of two parts.
WIDE BOTTOM BAR
TABBED TALL BAR
http://www.carbryck.com/EDSCREENS/Tabbed_Tall_Bar_and_Wide_Bottom_Bar.jpg
The WIDE BOTTOM BAR is the only component that is genuinely solid. TABBED TALL BAR has a small tab at it's top right corner.
DEEP SLIM TABBED DOUBLE BAR
SLIM DOUBLE TABBED END BAR
http://www.carbryck.com/EDSCREENS/Deep_Slim_Tabbed_Double_Bar_and_Slim_Double_Tabbed_End_Bar.jpg
DEEP SLIM is tabbed on the top right hand bar segment and reaches down below 8KHz. None of the other bar components do this.
SLIM DOUBLE TABBED is as described. It has two tabs on each of its bar segments. Also it appears to be part of some kind of footer to indicate the end of that component set.
TABBED BIG END BAR
http://www.carbryck.com/EDSCREENS/Tabbed_Big_End_Bar.jpg
Again as I'm sure everyone has already noticed this component indicates the end of the component set, and seems to be paired with the SLIM DOUBLE TABBED END BAR. These two components are always indicating some kind of component set footer and are always the same distance apart. This component bar actually has five tabs in total, one of which is very faint, but still definitely present.
http://www.carbryck.com/EDSCREENS/End_Bars_Distance.jpg
Time distances between component bars in a set seems to vary considerably, and must surely be a factor to consider. Also the tabs on the top of most of the component bars must also surely bare some kind of significance. If the creators of this puzzle wanted to make plain solid bars, I'm sure they would have done so.
Sorry if this makes things more complicated! And also sorry that I have no input regarding solving the puzzle, although I think we can gather from the style of the ruins that this particular mystery probably has nothing to do with the previous UA/UP/Thargoids mysteries and perhaps should be considered a separate entity.
My ASP is currently parked up at the Ruins and I intend to gather more recordings from all of the Obelisks over the next few days. But I don't think I'm capable of actually solving a puzzle like this.
Additional EDIT: Now that I've got more up to date with the discussion here, which everyone seemed to be posting whilst I was preparing this post! - My opinion of the carrier wave signal idea, (which I would never have thought of, even though I am familiar with FM synthesis) - I'm not convinced that it is any carrier wave signal. Looks to me more like part of the audio loop file. If you have a look at the 18 signal component sets link above it seems that the proposed carrier signal coincides heavily with the rest of the lower frequency sounds below. Also it is not solely present between the two footer bars, but throughout the spectrograph component sets, and indeed can also be found where there is no 'information'. Unless the audio file itself is a carrier wave? But how to isolate the specific sound? I wouldn't know how to do that.
Going by what people are saying I think I would probably go along with the theory that this could just be a red herring/dead end type thing, because of the seemingly random endless nature of the 'information'. Either that or it's way more complex, such as has been suggested that the added information placed inside each sample loop is based of environmental influences, which would be interesting.
- Si
Last edited: