Honestly, the quickest and easiest way for FD to clear this all up would be to simply state that regardless of how it happened, a dropped network connection is not considered cheating or exploiting. Problem solved.
As far as support not being staffed sufficiently to deal with the issue (if in fact that is the case) there's a fairly obvious solution there. Yes more staff cost money but reputational damage does too and it's hard to counter. For example, anybody think Hello Games' next title is going to be Steam's top seller before release..?
Folk like SDC create situation where players feel the need to combat log so they still enjoy the game, they then complain about it continuing the griefing into the support system. FDev ignore it.
Which is more important? The vast majority enjoying the game or a handful being right?
Factually they may be in the wrong, but practically speaking they could well be very right.
---
was that meant to be ego?
Consider the problem: combat loggers repeatedly cheat & exploit, with repeat-offenders regularly spotted, yet FDev state they take action against them. How do you prove what happens one way or another? I would say the OP and their friends did it the correct and only way: a sting op.
My impression is not of importance. As a moderator (of multiple subreddits) I check the public profile of everyone I feel the need to communicate with. It always adds relevant subtext to their communications, and aids me in my responses.
And whats with the OP, starts this crap off the goes MIA, you would think he would be here defending his crusade.
Folk like SDC create situation where players feel the need to combat log so they still enjoy the game, they then complain about it continuing the griefing into the support system. FDev ignore it.
Which is more important? The vast majority enjoying the game or a handful being right?
Factually they may be in the wrong, but practically speaking they could well be very right.
---
was that meant to be ego?
And whats with the OP, starts this crap off the goes MIA, you would think he would be here defending his crusade.
And many of us disagree.
But lets say OP was right, and FDev did lie. What does this achieve? It still drives a wedge between Frontier and the Community. Its stuff like this that kills games.
People complain that Solo and PG are killing Elite, but it is posts like these that will really truly kill Elite.
I like this game. I don't want to see it go the way of the Dodo because you and OP want to prove that FDev lied.
That explains why the subreddit is a toxic s**thole, aside from it being on reddit(which is a toxic s**thole).
Making the topic about Frontier lying is just misdirection as far as I'm concerned. Does anybody believe the people who did this would be any happier if Frontier was honest and said "we're not punishing players for combat logging for the time being, hopefully the complex issues around it will be able to be solved at some point in the future"?
What is there to defend? All the proof is there, just read it and form your own opinion. He doesn't need to be here to hold your hand.
Ignoring a problem doesn't get it resolved. Proving a problem exists and creating drama around it has been shown to get Dev action. The OP has proved that FDev lied. What I, and many commenters in this thread & elsewhere want, is for the issue to be resolved.And many of us disagree.
But lets say OP was right, and FDev did lie. What does this achieve? It still drives a wedge between Frontier and the Community. Its stuff like this that kills games.
People complain that Solo and PG are killing Elite, but it is posts like these that will really truly kill Elite.
I like this game. I don't want to see it go the way of the Dodo because you and OP want to prove that FDev lied.
That explains why the subreddit is a toxic s**thole, aside from it being on reddit(which is a toxic s**thole).
SDC is playing within the rules in a manner supported by FDev. Combat loggers are breaking the rules and using an exploit NOT supported by FDev.
That's all that really matters, how you feel about the way SDC conducts themselves is irrelevant.
ME! said:Factually they may be in the wrong, but practically speaking they could well be very right.
Maybe it's your inflexible brain that has trouble comprehending what I'm saying. That's your low level thinking at work here. I'm not contradicting myself in the slightest. What I am saying is that I no longer hold following the rules in the same regard as I did before on account of a recent change. For most circumstances I will remain the same (never have combat logged before), but not when it comes to a mechanic that is inconsistent with the rest of the game and in my opinion, more than a simple inconvenience. I am attached to my crew and come hell or high water I will do what I can to keep them alive (including cheat) until FD sees fit to give them the goddamned escape pod they deserve.
I'm confused with your two sided post, you must rant with one side and this is not a FREE TO PLAY game, people will ask for errors.
SDC is playing within the rules in a manner supported by FDev.
You're very welcome. They are true as well. As for your rhetorical question, it was in fact already answered. Incidentally this brings up the topic of your reading comprehension. You should try to get gud at reading. It comes in handy more often than you'd think.So why start now? What makes you any better then any other logger before you? Get off your moral high horse except that if your part of the problem now. If you log no matter how you try to justify it your still logging and should be treated the same. Oh by the way thanks for the insults really classy, really strengthens your argument.