Alien archeology and other mysteries: Thread 9 - The Canonn

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Same as first site so far
Indeed, but is that the same as original in solo, or original in open/group. We know there was a discrepancy at the original site between game modes, which was confirmed as "not working as intended" for all but solo.

That's just sad. If that's a copy/paste and if this is just as bugged as the first site, it's really sad. I have no other polite words to discuss how big was this FD's fail.
 
 -32.XXXX / -64.XXXX (60-68 – 28-34)
 -64.XXXX / -32.XXXX (60-68 – 28-34)
 64.XXXX / 32.XXXX (60-68 – 28-34)
 32.XXXX / 64.XXXX (60-68 – 28-34)
 -32.XXXX / 64.XXXX
 -64.XXXX / 32.XXXX
 64.XXXX / -32.XXXX
 32.XXXX / -64.XXXX
 -32.XXXX / 128.XXXX
 -32.XXXX / -128.XXXX
 32.XXXX / 128.XXXX
 32.XXXX / -128.XXXX
 -64.XXXX / -128.XXXX
 64.XXXX / -128.XXXX
 -64.XXXX / 128.XXXX
 64.XXXX / 128.XXXX
 -32.XXXX / -32.XXXX
 32.XXXX / 32.XXXXX
 -32.XXXX / 32.XXXX
 32.XXXX / -32.XXXX
 -64.XXXX / -64.XXXX
 -64.XXXX / 64.XXXX
 64.XXXX / -64.XXXX
 64.XXXX / 64.XXXX

So why isn't
0.XXXX, XXXXXX (etc) on this list? (not that I'm encouraging you to spam us constantly with even longer lists of incorrect locations where you cannot see the ruins, but I don't think you've eber been able to explain this).

Edited as I don't know coords :)
 
Last edited:
That's just sad. If that's a copy/paste and if this is just as bugged as the first site, it's really sad. I have no other polite words to discuss how big was this FD's fail.

The bug is there, they've acknowleded that. No reason to make the assumption that only one was bugged. The original site was confirmed by MB to be providing the correct data in solo mode and extra data (guessing that the extra data is from other ruins) in open.

One/some of the sites should give different data in solo mode to the original site.
 
Last edited:
Here the new site
Sorry for the quality, it's midnight in the game

zSA8L5d.png


jkkKAmT.png
 
Last edited:
The bug is there, they've acknowleded that. No reason to make the assumption that only one was bugged. The original site was confirmed by MB to be providing the correct data in solo mode and extra data (guessing that the extra data is from other ruins) in open.

One/some of the sites should give different data in solo mode to the original site.
Yes this: I don't have time now (family) but someone needs to jump into Solo and see whether Obleisks 14-36 work there or not
 
I guess they will all look the same as each is basically a big server and Wi-Fi site lol.
We probably found most of the data first time, there might be a few more here and at each other site. Each site is built as a clone with the same purpose (that's the excuse I'm going with anyway).

However I suspect there's something about their position on each planet that matches, the line of sight bit sticks in my head, something in the sky box must match from both sites, I'm off to explore.
 
could you get a screenshot of the planet details please??? :D

I want to know the differences between this new planet and the old one!

p.s. thanks for the inside ruins co-ords :)

I don't think I was far off in my drawing it is almost 32 by 32 :D so good to know all the locations I've been searching on 11 B aren't fruitless, as I always deviate by at least 4 latitude/longitude in a circular pattern to make sure I don't miss anything:

Synuefe ZL-J d10-119
• 11 B
 -32.XXXX / -64.XXXX (60-68 – 28-34)
 -64.XXXX / -32.XXXX (60-68 – 28-34)
 64.XXXX / 32.XXXX (60-68 – 28-34)
 32.XXXX / 64.XXXX (60-68 – 28-34)
 -32.XXXX / 64.XXXX
 -64.XXXX / 32.XXXX
 64.XXXX / -32.XXXX
 32.XXXX / -64.XXXX
 -32.XXXX / 128.XXXX
 -32.XXXX / -128.XXXX
 32.XXXX / 128.XXXX
 32.XXXX / -128.XXXX
 -64.XXXX / -128.XXXX
 64.XXXX / -128.XXXX
 -64.XXXX / 128.XXXX
 64.XXXX / 128.XXXX
 -32.XXXX / -32.XXXX
 32.XXXX / 32.XXXXX
 -32.XXXX / 32.XXXX
 32.XXXX / -32.XXXX
 -64.XXXX / -64.XXXX
 -64.XXXX / 64.XXXX
 64.XXXX / -64.XXXX
 64.XXXX / 64.XXXX

Why not make it -32.XXXX / -64.XXXX (-90 -> 90 / -180 -> 180). Should fall in your rounding rules.

Please just stop. It makes more sense to say the ruins are around one third under the equator, because as several times mentioned, longitude is arbitrary.
 
Last edited:
I guess they will all look the same as each is basically a big server and Wi-Fi site lol.
We probably found most of the data first time, there might be a few more here and at each other site. Each site is built as a clone with the same purpose (that's the excuse I'm going with anyway).

However I suspect there's something about their position on each planet that matches, the line of sight bit sticks in my head, something in the sky box must match from both sites, I'm off to explore.

looking forward to it
 
That's just sad. If that's a copy/paste and if this is just as bugged as the first site, it's really sad. I have no other polite words to discuss how big was this FD's fail.

Nothing wrong with having multiple sites so that we can stumble across ruins on more than one system - space is big :)

But, they've deliberately pointed us at these new sites, so they must tell us something more than "we can copy & paste". If the sites are exactly the same then it's unlikely they point at each other, more likely they all point at something else. We need to investigate and make sure they are all the same.
 
I'm already upto 5 million just sitting here flabbergasted at this whole farce trying to see if there's anything different, something out of place, nothing so far, hey I can sit here earning millions of credits leeching from other commanders if that's what FD wants, or they could actually put some imagination and substance in place.

Free money? Anyone
Lets all show a bit of community spirit and get scanning so you can run up a monumental amount of credits
 
Last edited:
Because is very hard find something on that large space this copy/paste thing seems logical. Maybe is there many more sites with same look, data etc. FD give us clue - look original site - not blindly search everywhere. :)
 
GRATS, FD!!!, you gave us a COPY/PASTE 2nd. ruin. Copypasted to that community, maybe thousands who has been scanned 0/24 hrs and made a lots of theories to find that.
Better if doing nothing!!!
 
So...is everything identical? Even the Spectograms and the Obilisk Patterns? If every bit of Data is identical...

Same , everything is same !


Be aware guys its might just be bugged, and I think the thing to do now its just stop searching for and saking frontier to fix that thing From Zero ! , its just like literaly unplayable ! poor player take their god damn week to look at a planet and find nothing till today.. and the only thing that we found is the same !

I tried everything from Zero ! and nothing change, same sound, same data, same animated stuff, same design, Copy-pasta 100% !

Well done frontier.. this time i'm ont happy to see that player who take their time for that didn't find anything new.. its just a big waste of time and I think that you guys here should reconsider this missions and just stop doing it ! stop searching and say to Frontier : Do it right or dont do it.

Its the first time that I am so angry !.. Thinking about everyone who spend this time on the planets for literally nothing new.. :c
 
Last edited:
CMDR Revshift just reports in PG that he is getting B12 data from a different obelisk than he is supposed to. It should come from E16, but he got it from A09.
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom