Alien archeology and other mysteries: Thread 9 - The Canonn

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.

Flibblestix

Flibblestix
So I'm buzzing about C22-17 AB3 and was thinking about the moon setting theory someone had (Sorry, can't remember who you are) I looked along the orbit line for the moon and it sets roughly in line with -31 latitude.

Though the moon moves rather slowly and I couldn't figure out which way it was going, so in a super scientific moment of genius, I came up with this idea:

levLodn.jpg

Stuck it on the right hand edge and went away for 15 mins. Et voila!
 
Last edited:

gaplant

gaplant
Cmdr Edard said:
Haha. See although this is a joke - part of me wants to put money on the claim that the Guardians made all the UAs and UPs and that the Unknown Ships are what remains of the Guardians. They looks like they are unmanned or AI controlled but also biological certainly has links with the claim that the Guardians not only experimented with biology but also started to augment themselves to keep up with the advance of AI (if i understood it correctly)

Drew Wagner stated in a twitch stream that "it's up to us if we call them Thargoids" in reference to the Unknown Ships. I wonder if the Ruins are like a time capsule set up by those that refused the technological/biological synthesis.

These are my musings anyway.
Click to expand...

Drew's input is either useless or actually misleading. I know exactly what his official connection and history is, but he still doesn't help things.
 

Factabulous

Factabulous
Mr.Dee said:
Why???
This tool gave me the developers.

And such a program to work with sounds and hertz, it is necessary to extract from the outside!
Click to expand...

Ppl have discussed and spent time on this particular thing for months, it's not new. Feel free to research yourself and report back - we're just saying what we've found to be the case so ppl can concentrate on something else.
 

CMDR Cylixx

CMDR Cylixx
TheOneWithNoLife said:
Guys, I've been thinking. The planet with the new ruins also has a moon. Can someone confirm/deny that the moon sets/rises at the big and small circle in the ruins, like in the first ruins?

If this is the same case, then we are looking for planets around red suns with moons, and we are looking on the ground below the orbit of the moon!

This should reduce the search area by a lot!
Click to expand...

Look at this genius.

Can confirm that one group of commanders has witnessed this at both sites, I have witnessed it at the first site.

The system map displays the moons orbital inclination, and argument of priapsis. The orbital inclination can be used to determine the exact path you need to follow on the planets surface to eventually run into the ruins, the priapsis (the point at which the orbiting body is closest to it's parent) could be significant if it turns out that THAT is where the ruins are placed.

There's obviously a step I am missing to determine it's precise location along the moons orbital path. I doubt it's a massively complicated equation but I am really bad at maths.
 
Last edited:

Factabulous

Factabulous
Pumabear8 said:
So, are we already for the next RAM TAH data collection cg? *hides from rotten tomatoes and pizza slices flying in my direction*
Click to expand...

Nope - we have ppl trying to decode the relics, others looking at the obelisk light patterns, others trying to track the moon path, and the beige flyers trying not to crash into planets. Oh, and the braintree explorers, and the ppl looking for outposts. And Exo, who has solved the ruins, and is waiting for us to catch up. We're too busy to do a CG, you may have to do it by yourself :)

Edit: I wonder why this thread is so confusing, and with 2-3 shifts of each going on in the same thread. We need our own forum.
 
Last edited:

Mr.Dee

M
Factabulous said:
Ppl have discussed and spent time on this particular thing for months, it's not new. Feel free to research yourself and report back - we're just saying what we've found to be the case so ppl can concentrate on something else.
Click to expand...

Ok, thanx.

I will look for the meaning traces
 

Factabulous

Factabulous
CMDR Cylixx said:
Look at this genius.

Can confirm that one group of commanders has witnessed this at both sites, I have witnessed it at the first site.

The system map displays the moons orbital inclination, and argument of priapsis. The orbital inclination can be used to determine the exact path you need to follow on the planets surface to eventually run into the ruins, the priapsis (the point at which the orbiting body is closest to it's parent) could be significant if it turns out that THAT is where the ruins are placed.

There's obviously a step I am missing to determine it's precise location along the moons orbital path. I doubt it's a massively complicated equation but I am really bad at maths.
Click to expand...

That argument of periapsis always makes me think it should be useful, but according to wikipedia you probably also need the longitude of ascending node, and then my head explodes. Adama will sort it.
 

AdmlAdama

A
TheOneWithNoLife said:
Guys, I've been thinking. The planet with the new ruins also has a moon. Can someone confirm/deny that the moon sets/rises at the big and small circle in the ruins, like in the first ruins?

If this is the same case, then we are looking for planets around red suns with moons, and we are looking on the ground below the orbit of the moon!

This should reduce the search area by a lot!
Click to expand...

That's what I'm working off of. I'm collecting data about the orbits to see if I can calculate the ruins location using these coordinates (or at least a path that contains the ruins)

If you'd like to help that along you can do so here
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-fqcT1t1QylyadOa23_fgFIlbRy7QBr2G2M4gjxOKsA/edit#gid=0
 

John Stoutbeard

John Stoutbeard
Last edited:

CMDR Cylixx

CMDR Cylixx
Panzertard said:
No need to come off like that. Let's be civil please.
EDIT: Or perhaps if you're serious, then I apologise.
Click to expand...

Was indeed being very serious, especially with the noise still being made about triangles inscribed on pillars and someone staring into the light of a relic like a literal distracted moth. Those ideas are really really bad, and keep coming up.
 

Xenia_K

Xenia_K
CMDR Cylixx said:
He means the damage to the ruin, and he is right, it should not be the same.

FYI there is no difference in the sites at all, every lump of dust is identical. It's all good, its just a game and assets get re used, primary concern is the identical data available.
Click to expand...

Vasco Sapien said:
Yes... exact in every detail, including the little scratches.
Click to expand...
did following test (until i got disconnected)
went to Meene and cleaned out / re-snatched the CG
switched to solo and did go to D102 / Site 1, scanned in solo all the std obelisks (order of scans/results):
A3 Casket&Relic - delta/gamma
G19 Casket&Relic - Alpha/Delta
received History 14
G17 Casket%Urn - Alpha
G18 Casket&Urn Gamma/Gamma
received Hist10 & Hist8
G20 Casket&Orb - Epsilon/Epsilon
received Hist12
D9 Casket&Tablet - Epsilon/Beta
F4 Casket&Totem - Alpha
received Hist11
C3 Tablet&Orb- Beta
received Hist15
C13 Tablet&Orb - Epsilon
received Lang12 & 8
C38 Tablet&Urn - Gamma
C36 Tablet&Relic - Epsilon/Alpha
received Lang14
E1 Tablet&Orb - Beta/Delta
B6 Orb&Urn - Beta
received Tech 7 & 10
H34 Urn&Relic - Beta
H26 Urn&Casket - Beta
received Bio 7 & 9

stayed in Solo and flew to IC2391 GW-V b2-4 B1
did the exact same order from A3 (including exact same items) until F4, upon scanning C3 I was disconnected (transaction server) and didn´t receive any new messages.
IMHO it has to be assumed that same message pool was triggered, hence no new messages.

FDev, I must confess I am p.i.s.s.e.d
same Layout of site, OK, could be explained by function
same damages, same erosion -> C&P -> lazyness
same data - You f.c.k.n must be joking - play that CG Yourself, Im out of it....
 
Last edited:

Rennard

R
Has anyone done a frame by frame of the obelisk triangle patterns?

They clearly repeat and I wondered if at any point they match the relics or if the relics are a key to which ones to pay attention to.
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom