Seems to me like a lot of nonsense trying to appeal to the console pew-pew market.
Can we have a new instance for the grown ups/old farts please.
It's commentary like this that makes Dangerous Discussion the cesspool that it is.
Seems to me like a lot of nonsense trying to appeal to the console pew-pew market.
Can we have a new instance for the grown ups/old farts please.
Now imagine this with the elite gunner cam![]()
You know saying what I said doesn't negate the point I made in the first place. I'll quote it again to you: "Personally though none of that matters... ED takes place over a thousand years into the future and surely there will be some technology to observe the surroundings in much better detail than what we can do now so that's not why I'm against that gunner view."
There you have it for a third time. You see I'm not trying to use modern day visions of consistency to judge things but quite the opposite really. The point is that the whole gunner view just seems to me like it's detached from the rest of the game. I literally thought when watching the livestream "Cool, now they are showing how the gunner operation looks like when viewed from the new vanity cam." and was shocked when I realized that is the actual gunner view. There's my subjective personal opinion right there and I'm not alone. As said, to me it seems inconsistent and detached from the rest of the game. I don't care how it's possible to explain how it works or doesn't work. The whole thing could be easily fixed by placing the viewpoint of the gunner view to the center of the ship and have the ship appear transparent. Though I would prefer if the whole gunner role was replaced with a weapons officer role who would take care of targeting and optimizing weapons systems to cope with various defensive variations that would become possible via other multicrew roles. That would be actual new content instead of wrapping the same old content to a new kind of UI. Also silent running ships shouldn't be visible in gunner view and turrets should be affected by the chaff or have the area of the crosshair made as small as it's in the case of fixed weapons. Boom, done.
The issue with the bolded is where does weapon fire originate from? You'd see lasers appearing from midair in front of you.
I've actually backed that game, but never looked at it again after they put VR support on hold. Might be worth downloading once they add it by the looks of it.
Seems to me like a lot of nonsense trying to appeal to the console pew-pew market.
Can we have a new instance for the grown ups/old farts please.
VR support has been in the game for a year.
It's called "Space Engine".
Because thats what this game was about, sitting on the stick looking around in the cockpit beeing immersed, not having the realitic computer war where you never see th target.
Nah im highlighting that technological capabilities where defined for this game, we sit in the cockpit as pilot we dont have a 3rd person camera and a crosshair, now if the technology exists for the gunner why doesnt it exist for the pilot?How does the multicrew gunner tole take away from that for the pilot? Do you even intent to crew up with people?
Or is the mere knowledge that others might enjoy the game in ways you don't like (while being perfectly avoidable for you) enough for you to sour the deal?
How does the multicrew gunner tole take away from that for the pilot? Do you even intent to crew up with people?
Or is the mere knowledge that others might enjoy the game in ways you don't like (while being perfectly avoidable for you) enough for you to sour the deal?
FirstElite-world problems?