General / Off-Topic Help me Professor Yaffle. You're my only hope to explain the Manafort Indictment

[Deleted member 115407]

The term limits have been changed before. Again, that doesn't display ignorance of the US system. You chose to try and discredit him on a detail, rather than actually address what his question was. But no matter, let's let it rest.

The President has no power or authority to change the term limits...

Reading comprehension... try to keep up.

 

[Robin of Spiritwood]

There isn't any need to dispute which narrative has "more evidence", since only one side is presently pleading guilty, and getting locked up.

The actual courts are doing the deciding. We can relax.

 

[6xes]

There isn't any need to dispute which narrative has "more evidence", since only one side is presently pleading guilty, and getting locked up.

The actual courts are doing the deciding. We can relax.

You seem confused between President Trump and another individual... are you suggesting Trump is guilty by asociation? seriously?
Still holding on to the Trump Russia collusion theory i see... lol good on ya

 

[Robin of Spiritwood]

You seem confused between President Trump and another individual... are you suggesting Trump is guilty by asociation? seriously?
Still holding on to the Trump Russia collusion theory i see... lol good on ya

Who me?

I'm just eating my popcorn over here.

Take it up with the convicted guy in the picture below. He's the one who says so.

Taken from Donald J. Trump's posting on Twitter, here is the President, Jeff Sessions, and guilty convict George Papodopolous all listening to George tell them about his Russian connections, and how Putin's niece and the Professor would like to help the campaign by hooking them up with the dirt on Clinton from Putin himself. Both Trump and Sessions have repeatedly claimed that none of that is true.

George Papodopolous's lawyer has nothing to say to defend him against the case. The account is uncontested.

Mmmmmmm popcorn.

 

[Adept]

Lets just say... if im wrong... then im wrong!! it would then bring into question my judgement, and the sources from where i get my information

Bravo. A good answer.

If the opponents of President Trump wish to accuse and pass judgement on President Trump relentlessly accusing him of Russian Collusion.. then it would seem only fair that the integrity of the accusers be checked too...
The Russian Collusion narrative began with Podesta during the election cycle...then echoed by the many democrats in support of Hillary Clinton.

Yet the Uranium one deal... upon inspection was a deal done and carried out with Russian Officials who are directly tied to Putin.
Many of the people who established this deal.. and made the deal official... received money or favours from those in control of it(who are also the Very Acusser's Of the President Trump/Russia/Collusion)

Since when is selling Uranium to Russia in the best interest of American National Security.. this is the basis of why it is important
Yet President Trump is accused of Russia collusion in the democratic process?

Which of the two situations has currently more evidence!!??

on your second question... Trump finding the best person for the Job...
President Trump has a person handling selections(Chief of Staff?).. and those people are brought forward to him... Trump selects based on his intuition and his review of what the person has done in the past...
Trumps selections are not a fullproof 100% best for the job.. that is not to say.. many of his current selections havent done great work,,,

Trump does his best... and thats all that can be asked of him as a president

Was Elon Musk the right person for the job?? or did he have a invested interest??

Russia has no shortage of uranium. The sale didn't depend on Clinton, and went through the normal channels. I'm afraid this is just a red herring to distract people from what is going on.

 

[Adept]

Reading comprehension... try to keep up.

I thought you wanted to drop the subject.

Oh yes, and this

Raging Trump demands FBI investigate Clinton, uranium – anything but Russia

 

[6xes]

Who me?

I'm just eating my popcorn over here.

Take it up with the convicted guy in the picture below. He's the one who says so.


http://www.dw.com/image/41179260_401.jpg

Taken from Donald J. Trump's posting on Twitter, here is the President, Jeff Sessions, and guilty convict George Papodopolous all listening to George tell them about his Russian connections, and how Putin's niece and the Professor would like to help the campaign by hooking them up with the dirt on Clinton from Putin himself. Both Trump and Sessions have repeatedly claimed that none of that is true.

George Papodopolous's lawyer has nothing to say to defend him against the case. The account is uncontested.

Mmmmmmm popcorn.

You assume way too much..... and becareful you dont choke on that popcorn

I take it Cluedo was never a game you were good at..

It was Robin of sherwood in the Forums with the fake candlestick!! that killed the truth!!

 

[Robin of Spiritwood]

I do like this popcorn.

I shall go get a much bigger sack for later.

 

[6xes]

Never played "Cluedo"- did you mean ... "Clue"?

yes the same whodunnit game.. yknow colonel mustard, mrs peacock,miss scarlet etc

 

[GJ51]

Russia has no shortage of uranium. The sale didn't depend on Clinton, and went through the normal channels. I'm afraid this is just a red herring to distract people from what is going on.

For sure

And no doubt that 145 Million they gave the Clinton Family Crime Fund was just because the Russians so altruistically support all the "charitable" work they do.

I hope the Russians are also in the market for bridges...

 

[GJ51]

Raging Trump demands FBI investigate Clinton, uranium – anything but Russia

On the contrary

It's the REAL Russian collusion that should be investigated - and unlike the current team, it should be investigated by someone without a conflict of interest, i.e. - not by the very people on the investigation team who were appointed to hide the real racketeering - specifically, Rosenstien, Comey, and Mueller who were aware of the deal and kept congress in the dark about what they knew so that the Clinton crime machine could execute the pay to play scheme.

If Uranium One was such a good deal, what did the US get in return?

We know how much the Clinton's got paid.

 

[6xes]

Russia has no shortage of uranium. The sale didn't depend on Clinton, and went through the normal channels. I'm afraid this is just a red herring to distract people from what is going on.

Red Herring?? are you serious??

Russia aside for a moment... one does not sell his enemy the ingredients and receipe for making weapons which could be used against itself!!

this is a matter of national security... and to play down the issue only succeeds in making a mockery of National Security

 

[GJ51]

Who me?

I'm just eating my popcorn over here.

Take it up with the convicted guy in the picture below. He's the one who says so.


http://www.dw.com/image/41179260_401.jpg

Taken from Donald J. Trump's posting on Twitter, here is the President, Jeff Sessions, and guilty convict George Papodopolous all listening to George tell them about his Russian connections, and how Putin's niece and the Professor would like to help the campaign by hooking them up with the dirt on Clinton from Putin himself. Both Trump and Sessions have repeatedly claimed that none of that is true.

George Papodopolous's lawyer has nothing to say to defend him against the case. The account is uncontested.

Mmmmmmm popcorn.

And you've read the transcript of that meeting? I haven't seen that published yet.

As I understand what's been reported, Popodopolous has only been charged with making a false statement as regards to the date of a meeting he had.

Some smoking gun ya got there.

 

[Robin of Spiritwood]

On the contrary

It's the REAL Russian collusion that should be investigated - and unlike the current team, it should be investigated by someone without a conflict of interest, i.e. - not by the very people on the investigation team who were appointed to hide the real racketeering - specifically, Rosenstien, Comey, and Mueller who were aware of the deal and kept congress in the dark about what they knew so that the Clinton crime machine could execute the pay to play scheme.

If Uranium One was such a good deal, what did the US get in return?

We know how much the Clinton's got paid.

Politifact rates this as "Mostly False".

I believe that Louie Gohmert is trying to get it investigated though, so great intellects beware.

And the transcript? I'm sure it's in good hands weeks ago.

 

[Zieman]

one does not sell his enemy the ingredients and receipe for making weapons which could be used against itself!!

Was it weapons grade uranium or powerplant fuel?

Is Russia the enemy of USA? With Clintons & Trumps in bed with Russians, it looks to me that Russia is the best friend of USA.

 

[GJ51]

... and to play down the issue only succeeds in making a mockery of National Security

That's the goal

 

[6xes]

Was it weapons grade uranium or powerplant fuel?

Is Russia the enemy of USA? With Clintons & Trumps in bed with Russians, it looks to me that Russia is the best friend of USA.

i knew the two would be construed which is why.. i put "Russians aside for a moment"
Friends and enemies is dependant on who is saying it...
Trump was and is hopeful that America and Russia could have friendly relations...
Hillary and Co.. see Russia as the enemy. which in itself she has taken a about face on Russia after the Uranium one deal...
(this shouldnt suprise.. Hillary always stated she had two faces)

The push from majority of senators or congressmen ultimately put pressure on Trump to have sanctions placed on Russia for a time..Russia is not happy about the sanctions.. but im sure Putin understands the volatile climate in USA at present... and hasnt reacted in a overly hostile way at this point

 

[GJ51]

Politifact rates this as "Mostly False".

I believe that Louie Gohmert is trying to get it investigated though, so great intellects beware.

And the transcript? I'm sure it's in good hands weeks ago.

We know that anyone can find any viewpoint they want on the internet to support they're preconceived conclusions , which is exactly why it should be investigated by a Special Prosecutor.

I'm impressed with your inside knowledge of the facts that as yet seem not to have been made public. Be careful that you don't become a target of a team wanting to know where you got your information from. You could lose your security clearance...

 

[Adept]

Red Herring?? are you serious??

Russia aside for a moment... one does not sell his enemy the ingredients and receipe for making weapons which could be used against itself!!

this is a matter of national security... and to play down the issue only succeeds in making a mockery of National Security

Russia has all the Uranium it could need, and if I recall it correctly, this was stuff for power plants, not bombs. You know they are different products right? The big boys use plutonium anyway, as they use H-bombs, not A-bombs. The uranium story really is a red herring. It's Saddam's Yellow Cake 2.0.

 

[Robin of Spiritwood]

Can we get some actual evidence of the Uranium One thing that I could read somewhere?
Every source seems to debunk it or just roll over laughing at it. It's Beng-SethRich-hazi all over again;.

( I'm serious. Willing to look at it. Show me a real news source.)

Also, if anyone wants to know what convict Papadopolous was actually charged with, why not read the actual court documents in this very thread.
I have made no claims or assumptions. Just the evidence in actual court.