Excessive oversteer and better reverse traction than forward traction is about as far from "perfect" for an AWD vehicle that I can think of. It's literally the opposite handling characteristics that you want.
I don't have problems with excessive oversteer since I use an analogue input device. As said above, I can't comment on your backwards traction problem.
Which device are you using and what mode are you driving in?
Driving an SRV on airless planets isn't driving on "loose dirt". The SRV usually drives on a hard rocky surface covered by a thin layer of dust (when it's not on a small ice moon) but the handling characteristics are the same regardless of surface characteristics on the planets we drive on anyways. The SRV also has a massive advantage over a real-world vehicle because it can actively generate strong downforce using its thrusters regardless of surface gravity. This means it should be much harder to lose traction under similar conditions compared to a conventional vehicle that would lack any ability to generate additional downforce on an airless low-g world. If you don't understand what I mean about how much of a massive advantage it is for the SRV to be able to generate so much downforce you're going to have to read about it if you want to have an actual discussion on the topic.
A real life vehicle wouldn't survive the stress we put our SRVs into for 5 seconds.
That's a completely different issue from the driving characteristics but yes, there are other annoying artificial limitations with the SRV gameplay in addition to the handling issues.
Glad that we agree on something.
Wait, you're suggesting that your opinion that "the handling is almost perfect" is based on rally driving and driving a dune buggy?
Seriously?
What rally car or dune buggy is designed to have better traction going backwards than it does forwards? Do you routinely see rally drivers needing to drive backwards up a slope? Because I routinely use reverse traction to get up steep slopes in the SRV.
Again, see above. Saying that I don't read your posts properly and then doing it yourself doesn't strenghten your argument. Once I had opportunity to check ingame we can continue the discussion about backwards driving. But if it turns out that I agree with you, this would be the 'almost' part. And if that's your biggest issue with the driving model I'd say it
is almost perfect...
The problem is that you didn't read them in the first place and yet still feel compelled to reply to them for some reason.
I didn't. I only replied to those that I read, knowing that you are repeating the same thing over and over again.