Again that's just your Opinion , and you think that way because of the game style you choose to play . i use a pack hound build with gimballed multi's and i think, and again only my opinion, P.A's with tlb is over powered and should be nerfed, even some of you calling it META. Only instead of crying cancer and saying they should be nerfed and completely removed, i find Awesome and creative ways to try and adapt against the builds that might potentially counter mine. That's the beautiful thing about engineering and elite dangerous... There is always a counter to a counter. That's what makes this game fun and challenging at times. Saying things like it should be "completely removed" is just plain immature and clearly demonstrates your one sided opinion. Perhaps you say this because its the counter to you build? judging by your comment, thats probably the case.
Dude, I got nothing personal against you or the 13th but premium ammo means grind to win. Basically for an hour of fight you need an hour to drive around the planet and shoot rocks. Its repetitive and boring when all you want is to fight and not compete who got to kill more rocks.
As for packhounds and seakers, they are completely counter for any hull or hybrid tank. Basically its an ultimate weapon against the federal ships except the vette.
The problem being is with rapid fire all it takes is reverse, hold the trigger and shoot 5 rounds of missiles/hounds WITHOUT EVEN POINTING AT THE ENEMY. Thats why I called for nurf. There is not much you can do against hounds except keep distance, but than its no longer a fight.
For the occasional seaker user (thx god not many use them) I need to sacrifice a utility module (the FAS has only 4 to begin with) that handicaps me in 95% of the fights where no missiles are used.
Its an unbalanced situation where a skill-less weapon dominates a fight.
Last edited: