Please. Frontier lurch from one extreme to the other, until sufficiently yelled at, apply an extreme fix to an extreme outcome and then ignore it until they are sufficiently yelled at.
It’s been happening for four years. They won’t put anything back. Just have another extreme thing happen on purpose, for purposeful reasons and ignore the warning that it’s extreme, it will then get shouted down. Suddenly that’s our fault and Frontier certainly didn’t intend the thing they absolutely extremely intended and appoligists will leap in to say “but this is just temporary and of course they will rebalance”.
Which is the one thing they should do, but refuse to. See you later on when the next extreme intended outcome is suddenly not intended, frontier swing the extreme axe and folks say the same thing all over again.
If folks are a bit dim and haven’t seen history repeating more than “ground hog day” then that’s more on the observer than observed, I dare say.
This is my gripe. I can understand nerfing things that are broken. But many in this thread and others have totally forgot that frontier already swung the nerf hammer once, stated that the system was now working as intended, and have decided to swing the hammer again because they messed up again. It wouldn't be so bad if they revisited things and balanced them, but frontier just leaves it broken.
Does anyone remember about three years ago, before the cutter and such, when imperial slave smuggling net 9-16k profit/ton on the black market and frontier chose to nerf this?
Some how they thought that 320k profit per ton equivalents were acceptable after "balancing".
(as to how I got that number Anaconda max cargo/passenger ratio: 468 cargo/200passenger = (2.34).
150mil per 200 passenger= 750,000cr per seat
converted to cargo equivalent:
750,000/2.34= 320,512,821)