Snip, no need
Last edited:
Have you read any of the statements in this thread from the player group actually being targeted by the UAs in question? Because they all make pretty clear that they're already prepared in advance to cancel the effects in-game, have planned their events in a way that it wouldn't matter if they hadn't, don't care in the slightest that they're not exempt, and don't want other people picking up high horses on their behalf.
So put yours down, okay?
I do know that outright removal of UAs isn’t the solution.
.Morality-aside, it's hard to argue with that logic.
I just wish people could sometimes aspire to something greater, overcoming petty differences and egotistic needs when something really worth doing happens. Like charities.
Surely real-life support for people with actual life-threatening issues takes precedence over making a point in a fracking game.
Or is it just me that thinks so?
The really curious thing for me is, why these people still have an active account, and how it can be that they probably will continue to do so after this.
.
What i mean is: You sometimes hear of charity events in other games. You hear of them honoring a deceased player, etc. But ED is the very only game since a long time, which makes the news that players actually go out and try to spoil the last wish of player with cancer. It's the very only game where people go for lengths to sabotage a charity event. And unfortunately it seems like once again, FDs response will be a massive "uh? meh!".
.Firstly, if you honestly think this is the only game in which things like this happen, you haven't played many games.
[...]
Firstly, if you honestly think this is the only game in which things like this happen, you haven't played many games.
Secondly, in pretty much every other game I know of, the players take care of stuff like this regardless of whether the developer also takes retrospective action. The one thing this game is fairly unique for is the sheer number of times people are on here asking FDev to 'do something' about this, that and the other.
People have sold an in-game item at a station, which has caused an in-game effect which was not only specifically programmed by the very developers who are yet again being told they need to 'do something' but was then also given at least one balancing pass to make it easier to combat. I hate to be the one to break it to you but nobody is going to get banned in this game for trading, which is literally all they have done.
If anybody bothered to listen to Ed's commentary on the Dove Enigma saga, you would know he said that despite the significant community reaction, a single ship's delivery of meta alloys would have been enough to fix that situation.
I'm sure some of the more extreme elements here will read what I've just written and interpret it as support for the bombers because that's the kind of nonsensical binary thinking that I've seen employed every single time this happens. I don't support it, I think it's a pretty lame thing to do and in particular I think that plum who keeps doing it as some alleged 'protest' against I don't even know what needs to learn to let go.
Having said that, you can't be expecting a developer to ban or sanction people for doing things in their game which they specifically intended (or they wouldn't have coded the UA damage mechanic to begin with) just because you don't like it.
Yeah I'm wondering how the hell these people are managing to get a hold of that many number of probes to start station shutdowns.
We know the Thargoids are back.
We know they don't take lightly to their stuff being taken.
We know that UA's are Thargoid tech.
Frankly if the Thargoids continue to ramp up their incursion and the rather angry reclaimation of their stuff. UA's should be increasingly rare to the point of non-existence as the Thargoids continue.
We know they're capable of hyperinterdictions.
I'm surprised the Thargoids aren't doing exactly what we want them to do and counter these deviants. They should be ripping these people from hyperspace right and left for carrying that much of their tech and blasting them to bits to reclaim what was theirs. They should be just as relentless as the ATR is reputed to be in 3.0. Once they know you have something of theirs, they should hunt you relentlessly for it. Even if you CL the game would remember you have those items and the second you load back up, they're right back on top of you.
Your only recourse would be to dump and run.
So why haven't they done this yet?
Morality-aside, it's hard to argue with that logic.
I just wish people could sometimes aspire to something greater, overcoming petty differences and egotistic needs when something really worth doing happens. Like charities.
Surely real-life support for people with actual life-threatening issues takes precedence over making a point in a fracking game.
Or is it just me that thinks so?
.
Hmm, you counter my "i haven't heard of anything like that in another game since a long time" with a video from 2006. Thanks for making my point. (I myself could also bring something similar from 2011 or so, which would still support my point of view. )
And no, i don't really expect FD to act. But it really makes me wonder, what kind of people are we having here?
It would even be better if we could teach those who don't get the difference between something purely in-game and something connected to the RL, but i by now got the feeling that exactly those who lack the ability to understand that also lack the capacity to learn it without feeling pain. A few weeks of not being able to log in here migth be just the little pain necessary to start the learning process...
.
.Gamers. Some of whom will be pillocks, same as some of virtually every other cross section of humanity you could name will be.
.It's actually comments like this one that made me wonder just how much gaming you do because if you seriously imagine that not being able to log into this game (or any other game) for a couple of weeks would prompt some kind of life reappraisal by players who do stuff like this to begin with then at best, I'd have to say you're a wonderfully optimistic person. They won't give a crap and no amount of crusading is going to change that.
.
Perhaps i live in a better world than you...
While not condoning the douchbaggery of targetting these types of events, I do question the impact on the events themselves and the outrage that inevitably follows.
Isn't the basis of them, that you are streaming the game and that people can donate.
I don't quite see how a downed station prevents that from continuing, other than a potential change of gameplay.
My take is to carry on regardless and don't even acknowledge the tools that like to do these things.
Every one of these threads strokes their warped little egos just a bit more.
It does, though - station being UA bombed, Frontier communicate using their top secret Galnet channels to the three people who read it a week before any actual shutdown or other ill effects occur, one of them delivers a ship full of meta-alloys, job done.
It doesn't, and I think the leader of Privateer's Alliance himself said as much a few pages back. Naturally it got buried.
They said they're ready in the event a bombing takes place, and people have said they're willing and able to pitch a hand with moving Meta-Alloys if it comes to that. So there's really no cause for concern, people just want something to hyperventilate about, and the "statement" being made by the bombers themselves is of dubious impact at best.![]()
Ph1Lt0r here, wing commander of PA, I was really surprised to see PA mentioned here; appreciate the post! We defiantly don't condone the use of UA bombing in game, we are prepared for it. We have some dedicated folks who have mined a few thousand MAs and have them on standby. The unfortunate thing is overall, I agree with what the commander who is UA bombing wants changed, just wish it went a different way. The good news is that it won't affect the charity as events are not using our stations.
I do appreciate that the commander who may or may not be bombing also promoted donating to the charity. I believe while UA bombing isn't a good thing, his heart is in the right place, and we always will accept a challenge and will thank him for a donation. We also appreciate the community support as well! We're up to 30% of our goal!
Fly safe CMDRs, watch out for those wild Thargoid Artifacts floating around
I guess what I am saying is, this isn't worth a witch hunt. -signed the folks being targeted.
Also, for those who run player groups. We created a new account with our wing name, use it for private group, and got it into a cutter to store MAs for such situations. We have been targeted several times for UA bombing, but none have ever been successful.
There is no such thing as bad publicity.
Even just the threat of UA bombing has gotten a lot more eyes on the charity event.
I don't see this as a bad thing.