That is not what FD sold players with the LEP. That is a nonsensical example that doesn't reflect any actual business practice, anywhere.
It's incomprehensible nonsense, so I would say no. There is no value because you're making up a nonsensical example that has no relationship to buying a retail product.
If you are trying to compare that ridiculous example to an LEP purchase, then you are either trolling or you are again trying to defend FD at all costs because you can't handle the thought of FD having done something wrong with how they treated LEP customers.
Sorry but you really need to do better here. We aren't talking about a nonsensical example with a theoretical amount of strawberry candies here. We are talking about a specific product that FD advertised, sold and has failed to deliver to their customers within a reasonable timeframe.
Like I said I give up. Argue with yourself about reasonable timeframes and delivery. Better yet, take it to court if you're so certain that your imagined delivery timeline has such a firm legal standing that it forms a basis for legal action. I don't mean tell us again about how little we understand of the law; this is the internet, for all I know you flip burgers for a living and once watched an episode of Perry Mason. Take it to court and then come back to laugh at me when you win. I'll be right here.
The example I used was a direct paraphrasing of the LEP by the way, as per Ant's post. Quite surprised you can't see that. It says that something will be delivered now (the bag of sweets) and that it will include some specified content (the strawberry ones, let's call them landing on planets without an atmosphere). Then it says there is an intention to deliver something specific in the future (some more strawberry sweets, or let's say more planetary landing gameplay including atmospheric planets) but does not specify by when, just that it will come at some point. It also says that some other things (some more updates/some more sweets) which are not specified directly in terms of type or number at all other than in the vaguest terms, will be delivered and again does not specify by when.
That is literally in the post by Ant which shows the LEP details. You know, the one that shows:
NO SPECIFIED NUMBER OF UPDATES
NO TIMELINE AT ALL FOR WHEN ANY UPDATES WILL BE DELIVERED
NO DETAILS OF ANY SPECIFIED CONTENT AT ALL OTHER THAN THE PLANETARY GAMEPLAY
Look at it. I am not making this up. That is what it says. It makes no difference what you want it to say, or wish it said, or thought it said. What matters if you're going to be accusing people of fraudulent behaviour is what it actually does say.
If you disagree, reply with the number of updates. Or the date that any particular update will be issued by. Or the period after which no more updates will be delivered.
If you cannot do that, anything else you say is hot air.
Last edited: