Oh dear, are you kidding me?
Ok, let's present some of the quotes of the article:
- title of the article: "shrunk to an 'earthly' scale"
- "though a lot of ship details, one can not appreciate when ships are flying at large distances (so what's the point of having those high detailed ships?)"
- "and the cockpits doesn't look better than those of ED or other games"
- "It feels like an ordinary space sim"
- "Not what one might expect considering the millions of euros of premature praise"
- "when the space ship starts rotating around itself after a hit it looks quite embarrassing"
- "the discrepancy between graphical extravagance and actual game play will have to be discussed once SC will reach releace date, at the latest"
- "Hearing the answer about what will be available on planets to visit we are reminded to Peter Molyneux and Richard Garriott: Like with them, one can not be sure whether or not CR is inventing all those features in his answers on the fly while we are asking ..."
- "Isn't there the danger that CIG will lose the focuse with all the planned features? CR seems to not really understand the question and continue to talk about things coming in the next modules ..."
- "But we are not really successful to get CR explaining to us the bigger picture of what SC really will be all about. Maybe because he still don't have it himself?"
- "Or maybe he has the picture but is only focusing on little modules step by step?"
- "
But maybe he resembles a child which has been given an unlimited budget for toys?"
- "Maybe he is thinking: You will see it when it's finished!"
Ok, so what was it Mr.Nowak was saying about this article?
-> "I read it. It was not too critical ..."
Took me a little bit of time to translate the main ideas of that article. But i guess it was worth it, isn't it?