I'm now 2,000ly out at Hillary Depot in a 30ly ship.
[...]
I guess that's why there are 42 sections in the galaxy now, to draw out the achievements a bit.
ETA Re-reading this I'm doing the codex a dis-service, it's pretty good. I don't use external tools & I'm not really interested in visiting things discovered by other players for the sake of it (Beagle Point was a notable exception) but it's good to have targets to aim for & knowing there is a type of asset I've not ticked off is my kind of gameplay. Shame it doesn't list my discoveries from the ~30,000 systems I visited prior to 3.3 though
Okay I see what you're saying, Zig.
I've had weeks of playing the FSS to pieces during the betas, and now we're live, and I've thought hard about whether this is just another "oohhh it's new and shiny!" honeymoon thing.
Maybe it is and maybe it's not, but what I've posted earlier is what I'm thinking right now. I'm really enjoying exploration again - there is now actual variety in the process of exploration and godsdamint FDEV you're making me lose sleep because I'm finding it very difficult to crowbar myself away from the game at 1am instead of going to bed at a more reasonable 11:30pm [mad]
2 quite different sentiments to my post, which actually is pretty great
@River, I so hear what you're saying. The way I used to explore is gone, I wanted Frontier to develop in a way that I could extend on that. Wasn't to be, my way was thrown into the bin, and was replaced by blob hunting. Right now I am working different angles on the new system. I started quite wrongly with saturation to really get into the FSS and see where the shinies were for me. Every system, full exploration. Lasted 4 systems before I wanted to strangle a developer. I actually didn't want to jump to a new system to start going through the mundane motions all over again. That didn't work. So I now switched to spur of the moment exploration. Hop through systems until I feel all hopped out, or until I find something noticable. Which usually means scanning a bunch of HMC or MR planets which are landable for the sake of investigating POIs. So far the FSS is a thing I look to avoid. I am looking for something in the FSS to look forward to. Unsuccessful so far, but I just started. I have some more ideas and potential projects. And there's encountering the unexpected which I can't factor in. The new mechanism has to be judged on it's own. I'll get back to that in a minute ...
My spiel is long range exploration, and this system has a part of that covered. Once you are where you want to be you can dig in. But these are all presents. Go to place X and investigate. The beauty of the old way was, you knew what you were traveling through, so your eye could be caught by many a thing that made the trip memorable. It was always those moments that made me look forward to traveling towards a destination a long way away. That I am afraid is lost. The system you encounter will no longer nudge you and go: hey sailor, wanna spend some time? It's you who always needs to go: lets spend some time.
What I'm not going to do is decide after a few days the new system is not worth discovering (pardon the pun). That all depends whether I find a groove, or a flow which suits me. Since I cannot account for the unexpected, I cannot judge against it.
@Genar, really thrilled to hear you and other people enjoying exploration. The more people enjoy it, the better. Even if I'm the one left empty handed. I have had 3 good years of exploration and if this is quits, this is quits. I have accepted that the moment I found out about the new mechanisms. And before anyone goes: why have you been arguing so much against the new system, it's a discussion forum and I'm opinionated, deal with it
Be mindful though, I'm not betting against this being a result of the honeymoon period, but we're in day 3 so it may very well be. And I must say, there are signals that are cautiously hinting towards it, which I won't go in to, because they may very well be the figment of imagination. Who knows, it's all so subjective.
But I do claim that this mechanism has to have longevity before it can be considered a success.