here, so your attack the person now and not the arguments... cool
''Sorry not sorry, but I'm not going to sift through many of the >50 pages to distill your own argument for you.'' <this is a trick
So it would seem that my argument is the new system is good but needs adjustment. I've been against the idea of reverting or removing the new system. So i guess we are in agreement, but you didn't know that, cus you didn't read. You have attacked someone that's probably on your side
I have talked of adjustment, to accommodate styles of play we used to have. it even boiled down to, it would be nice if we could peek as the scanner without having to slow down.
Dude, I don't care if you "agree" with me or not. This is not a fr eakin debate club.
If I see stupid, I call out stupid.
Last edited: