If anything, I'd vote for the ADS to be a ship function, not an extra module. Seems to me like FD went half-way there. Pure explorer ships will still jump further, but that would open more options for exploration too.
How else would you word it? Can we discuss the thread and not pick holes in language please. I've given you all a chance to state your reasons in a civil manner and frankly it's already starting to descend into argument again. sheesh.
Let’s see, how to justify leaving the ADS dead and buried within the OP’s parameters...
The FSS is interactive and engaging. The ADS was passive and mindless. The FSS makes you actually have to do something. The ADS allowed exploration to be reduced to a trio of long running, self-invoking macros.
Vastly more information is provided by the FSS, the ADS provided nothing.
Finally, and perhaps most importantly - Elite is not now, nor has even been a Design-by-Committee game. This is a change that Frontier has decided to make. Love it or hate it does not matter. The decision is theirs, not ours.
The game has changed, the choice to adapt or not is up to the player.
Yeah I have yet to see an argument calling for the ADS back that is NOT selfish, which per OP is not valid.
That depends on the goal. If you want to populate the system map the ADS is the easier option and that seems to be the number one reason why people want the ADS back. So no, the ADS is the easier option in regards to the topic.
Why? If the ADS returned I sure as hell wouldn't use it again it's boring, but others would why deny them JUSTIFY IT.
Don't like it don't use it.
If anything, I'd vote for the ADS to be a ship function, not an extra module. Seems to me like FD went half-way there. Pure explorer ships will still jump further, but that would open more options for exploration too.
Per OP’s rules, group 1 is invalid. They want optional ADS back because they don’t like the FSS. It’s inherently selfish
I'm struggling to see the justification for another ADS thread
pure nonsense, most are happy with a compromise about as far removed from selfish as you can get....I suggest you buy a dictionary!
Well if justifying something on the basis of game design isn't justification to you, then this isn't my conversation. Hope you find what you are looking for.
It was also to give the anti ADS side the chance to discuss their views in a civil manner, sadly pretty much abject failure there.
IMO there arn't many reasons why a compromise should not be attempted, it's all up to FD. I HOPE they listen beyond the chest thumping of the Anti ADS side.
Per your own parameters for discussion, the want for the ADS to come back in inherently selfish.
"caveats:
1) Not liking the ADS is NOT a valid reason
2) Liking the new FSS mechanic is NOT a valid reason
3) Not liking others to have a choice is NOT a valid reason"
By extension, liking the ADS is not a valid reason to want it back, disliking the FSS is not a valid reason to want the ADS back. The only reason to want the ADS back is because one thinks the FSS is bad or they don't like it. You established at the outset of the discussion that this is an invalid motive. By your own argument it should not come back.
Let's remain unbiased - the anti-FSS side has been equally uncivil and demanding....
I see selfish this selfish that thrown around, but I haven't seen anybody try to explain why selfish is ba.
Indeed, I've yet to see one though.
Sigh, you are correct only IF people like that were calling for the FSS to be removed...they are not. It's the opposite of selfish, why can't you see that?
sheep are selfish?
I presume you mean "bad" at the end....well I'm sorry, if someone has to explain to you why a selfish reason is bad, then ....well...I just don't quite know what to say!