Going against your own word - "infiltrators" please note
- Thread starter Rampant
- Start date
Bob Lighthouse
Banned
Are you going to keep being dishonest?
That's just obfuscating and building a strawman.
Last edited:
Not enough double ells and whys.
Back to the topic of ingame untrustworthiness then, why would I believe this time around you'll actually play in open ?. Based on your past performance (the only thing I have to judge you by) its just forum bravado and you'll only log into solo.
It all seems pretty straight forward to me.
Blowing up a DW2er in open, well not something I would do but its a legitimate in game thing to do, if you get popped it might suck but you chose to go open. FDEV should leave you to suck it up.
Joining their PG, agreeing to the conditions via the out of game application system and then blowing someone up is a different beast and makes you (not you RP'd character) a (insert insult of choice). No problem with FDEV resurecting the DWer.
Doesn't seem that complicated.
Blowing up a DW2er in open, well not something I would do but its a legitimate in game thing to do, if you get popped it might suck but you chose to go open. FDEV should leave you to suck it up.
Joining their PG, agreeing to the conditions via the out of game application system and then blowing someone up is a different beast and makes you (not you RP'd character) a (insert insult of choice). No problem with FDEV resurecting the DWer.
Doesn't seem that complicated.
Last edited:
It's only obfuscation if you have less than 4th grade level reading comprehension. It's not strawman either, it's based on empirical observation and many griefers themselves admitting it.
I'm really not concerned by your baseless accusations, Bob.
I have a modest pvp killcount of around 2300.
That didn't happen by hanging out in solo.
Zaphod is a pretty common name in space sims though.
Perhaps you're thinking of a different one.
Nope, you're the only Zaphod Hawke I know who issues PVP challenges then sticks to solo.
Well, Bob. As this is obviously all you've got, I'm going to let it go for now.
You clearly don't understand the PvP community in this game, and have always seemed jealous that you can't participate, tbh.
We all know how bad your internet connection is.
Maybe I'll give it another shot before I peace out.
Maybe not.
Goose4291
Banned
Last edited:
Quite a fitting issue to be dug up for the going against your own word thread really. See you next time, always a pleasure
[up].
The thread is about PG ganking, so I have no negative comment to make on smecca, since he says he hasn't ganked a PG.
I can only offer again what I originally delivered, that ganking in Open doesn't give a 100% accurate measurement of a player. However, going out of your way to join a known no-PvP PG on the premeditated reason to gank - we can say incontrovertibly, 100% accurately about those* players, the individuals themselves, that they are liars and cheats. And that's what this thread is about, although it does appear to have drifted away from the original message and topic.
Yours Aye
Mark H
So essentially the point of this thread is to point out that lying and cheating are things.
Wow. Who knew.
Wow. Who knew.
No you don't understand the PvP community in this game! [mad]
Sorry. Couldn't resist. Ziggy is weak.
I bet the liars and cheats will immediately repent of their sins upon discovering this revelation.
We *could* take this extreme outlier example and suggest it is true of everyone who has an emotional response as a direct result of being targeted for no other reason than to elicit an emotional response.
Or we could just ignore it as an extreme outlier and treat your implication that it is commonplace, with the disdain it deserves.
And let's not mention combat logging, which appears to elicit a similar emotional response. From the very same people who spout phrases such as " just don't *let* yourself have an emotional response". That'd be hypocrisy, don't you think?