You apparently do not understand how software release numbering works.
TBH there's no hard-and-fast rule about software release numbering.
It's *nice* if software vendors stick to some clearly defined numbering scheme, but there's no law that states it *has* to be numbered as MAJOR.MINOR.REVISION
Obviously it helps
But take the Linux kernel as an example ... the numbers just keep going up on a per-release basis and even the MAJOR number isn't any indicator of some massive change to the architecture.
Version 5.0 is just released and it's just an *incremental* release following on from 4.20 ... https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/03/05/linux_50
So the next release will be what it will be, whether it's 3.3.06, 3.3.1, 3.3.6, 3.4 or 4.0 (or even just 5)