A lot of people play computer games to escape from real life pillocks. The last thing they want is to be continually griefed by them.If I could change just one thing in Elite Dangerous it would be to remove Solo and PGs.
A lot of people play computer games to escape from real life pillocks. The last thing they want is to be continually griefed by them.If I could change just one thing in Elite Dangerous it would be to remove Solo and PGs.
And that we seem incapable of compromise...Well, this thread showcases one thing more than any other thread. The wishes of the various players are directly contradicting each other and irreconcilable. We'd all be better off if we just went separate ways to different games that are more to everyone's individual liking.
It means Fdev cannot appease all the players without destroying the game. So they are better off desining the game following their own philosophy and make what they produce compelling enough to win players over no matter the amount of bitter tears on the forum.And that we seem incapable of compromise...
Can't argue with that. Best start saving up all those salty tears then, to thaw the ice, since it'll be a cold day in hell before most of this forum is won over.It means Fdev cannot appease all the players without destroying the game. So they are better off desineing the game following their own philosophy and make what they produce compelling enough to win players over no matter the amount of bitter tears on the forum.
And that we seem incapable of compromise...
Mine was in response to years of demands that open be the one true mode. Open has caused more salt in this forum than any other topic including politics and religion. Open is in essence already ruining what would otherwise have been the BDSSEWhere is the common ground with someone wanting to remove open because people complain about how others play? The compromise is just being more tolerant, not any change to the game.
I think there's been lots of good ideas that are compatible & workable, very few have been contentious and those that have (as with yours) have been knowingly contentious.
Eventually the servers will be switched off and those looking for a game unaffected by other players may well get what they want. I play as much as I do because I know that one day I will no longer be able to.
Mine was in response to years of demands that open be the one true mode. Open has caused more salt in this forum than any other topic including politics and religion. Open is in essence already ruining what would otherwise have been the BDSSE
As long as Frontier isn't bought out by EA or something, I think there's a fair chance the servers will be up for quite a while. Unfortunately, once the servers do go down, I doubt Frontier will provide off-line patches or open server hosting support.Where is the common ground with someone wanting to remove open because people complain about how others play? The compromise is just being more tolerant, not any change to the game.
I think there's been lots of good ideas that are compatible & workable, very few have been contentious and those that have (as with yours) have been knowingly contentious.
Eventually the servers will be switched off and those looking for a game unaffected by other players may well get what they want. I play as much as I do because I know that one day I will no longer be able to.
As log as Frontier isn't bought out by EA or something, I think there's a fair chance the servers will be up for quite a while. Unfortunately, once the servers do go down, I doubt Frontier will provide off-line patches or open server hosting support.
A tangent to the topic. Just my take.
The indicators are already there, perhaps you don't read the description properly.Maybe an add on for Mission board. That say. This Mission could take time to complete. If you are lazy do not accept it.