It was in the 10 minute mission segment from the time stamped linkFair enough, I wasn't going to sit through 3hrs+ of gaming video, so no doubt missed this.![]()
It was in the 10 minute mission segment from the time stamped linkFair enough, I wasn't going to sit through 3hrs+ of gaming video, so no doubt missed this.![]()
Which is going to be fun when the servers can take more than 50 people so they can't fill the population.
I'm not sure why you have difficulty understanding that watching the implosion of (things like) Bitconnect was fun. It was very entertaining!Because the idea that outside of a thread where people are obsessed with the failure of this game...
They are role playing,SC can’t do what they’re trying to make it do.TBH, As much as I hate them, house rules need to be put into staged or planned events to avoid broken game mechanics running riot (for example, the 'no premium ammo/engineering tournaments' that permeate throughout ED, or the 'no fire in charge' rule that Mount and Blade Napoleonic and Holdfast groups generally adhere to).
It was in the 10 minute mission segment from the time stamped link
I'm not sure why you have difficulty understanding that watching the implosion of (things like) Bitconnect was fun. It was very entertaining!
They are role playing,SC can’t do what they’re trying to make it do.
To me it comes across as a little bit desperate.
The project has already failed, +7 years and counting, still in very early alpha, must be made by sloths.Not my point though, was it?
Regardless of all the 8 or 9 regular posters here with their (to put it bluntly) sad desire to see this project fail, so much so they pounce on the smallest tidbit of information and expand it to the nth degree, the rest of the world doesn't give a jot about star citizen in the same manner either way. Are we really surprised that a MSM magazine article like Forbes isn't going to be the spark that lights the resistance and turn everyone against it, seen as to be clear, nobody outside of the Space game community gives a jot about it.
Not about the game, but maybe someone gives one about regulating free equity without bounds and promises.Not my point though, was it?
Regardless of all the 8 or 9 regular posters here with their (to put it bluntly) sad desire to see this project fail, so much so they pounce on the smallest tidbit of information and expand it to the nth degree, the rest of the world doesn't give a jot about star citizen in the same manner either way. Are we really surprised that a MSM magazine article like Forbes isn't going to be the spark that lights the resistance and turn everyone against it, seen as to be clear, nobody outside of the Space game community gives a jot about it.
Doesn't matter. Whatever your point was, it missed the mark because it related to some hallucination of yours rather than the thing you were referring to — a hallucination that only comes about because of your difficulty in understanding that critical detailNot my point though, was it?
You can RP with a set of dice.Putting aside my point about house rules (beloved by a lage chunk of the ED community as whole) How is RP (something regarded as great for the most part by this forums community) now be bad?
![]()
Oh, we're talking about Star Citizen.
I shall now go purchase an 1dRi5 from Crobbers.
I shall now go purchase an 1dRi5 from Crobbers.
Doesn't matter. Whatever your point was, it missed the mark because it related to some hallucination of yours rather than the thing you were referring to — a hallucination that only comes about because of your difficulty in understanding that critical detail
After re-reading my sentence, yeah I was silly on this oneAgain, nothing to do with my original point that thinking that the lack of reaction to an article in a magazine like Forbes, who's readership don't care about star citizen, had to be silenced by CiG using the advertising money is ridiculous.
…which, as mentioned was irrelevant and completely separated from reality. No amount of abuse — generalised or specific — will ever change that, and you really need to stop assuming your hallucinations are real.Again, nothing to do with my original point
People give a jot about micro transactions and the predatory practices of games developers.Not my point though, was it?
Regardless of all the 8 or 9 regular posters here with their (to put it bluntly) sad desire to see this project fail, so much so they pounce on the smallest tidbit of information and expand it to the nth degree, the rest of the world doesn't give a jot about star citizen in the same manner either way. Are we really surprised that a MSM magazine article like Forbes isn't going to be the spark that lights the resistance and turn everyone against it, seen as to be clear, nobody outside of the Space game community gives a jot about it.
…which, as mentioned was irrelevant and completely separated from reality. No amount of abuse — generalised or specific — will ever change that, and you really need to stop assuming your hallucinations are real.
Not my point though, was it?
After re-reading my sentence, yeah I was silly on this one![]()