The ADS

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Are they so unconvincing that you don’t want to post them again?

These threads get so long, it’s not as if repeating something for the nth time is unprecedented.
I just said a few posts up. It breaks the games lore, it doesn't make logical sense to have them both. That is important to me. Having them both will have a negative effect on the game for me. It may not be important to you, but to be frank, I don't really care.

I am not arguing, I am making a statement. You can care about how I feel or not. But don't expect me to care about yours if you disregard mine.

Which is exactly what you have been doing from the word go.
 
Last edited:
I just said a few posts up. It breaks the games lore, it doesn't make logical sense to have them both. That is important to me. Having them both will have a negative effect on the game for me. It may not be important to you, but to be frank, I don't really care.

I am not arguing, I am making a statement. You can care about how I feel or not. But don't expect me to care about yours if you disregard mine.

Which is exactly what you have been doing from the word go.

Game lore is very much a matter of personal opinion, given how inconsistent much of the game is.

Having two scanners that do different things is very logical.
One focused on location, the other focused on type.
 
I just said a few posts up. It breaks the games lore, it doesn't make logical sense to have them both. That is important to me. Having them both will have a negative effect on the game for me. It may not be important to you, but to be frank, I don't really care.

I am not arguing, I am making a statement. You can care about how I feel or not. But don't expect me to care about yours if you disregard mine.

Which is exactly what you have been doing from the word go.

Don't cofuse the game lore with your lore.
 
Game lore is very much a matter of personal opinion, given how inconsistent much of the game is.

Having two scanners that do different things is very logical.
One focused on location, the other focused on type.
Not when one makes the other make no sense at all.

I okay for two different scanners as long as they do two completely different things. They do not. They both focus on location anyone focuses on type as well. There is no logical sense to have both.
 
Not when one makes the other make no sense at all.

I okay for two different scanners as long as they do two completely different things. They do not. They both focus on location anyone focuses on type as well. There is no logical sense to have both.

Clearly there is a logical sense when there is a group of explorers saying that the FSS does not meet their needs.

Your needs are different, so you don’t see the logic.
But then, as you clearly don’t need it, don’t fit it, and console yourself that the rest of us are just beng illogical.

The logic of the FSS remains unchanged - it keeps on being a visualization of a scan result that you can browse at your leisure.
 
Clearly there is a logical sense when there is a group of explorers saying that the FSS does not meet their needs.
Never denied that.

Your needs are different, so you don’t see the logic.
But then, as you clearly don’t need it, don’t fit it, and console yourself that the rest of us are just beng illogical.
Nope, it's your needs are different and it is you that cannot see the logic.

The logic of the FSS remains unchanged - it keeps on being a visualization of a scan result that you can browse at your leisure.
No it doesn't.
 
Never denied that.


Nope, it's your needs are different and it is you that cannot see the logic.


No it doesn't.

Are you really claiming that the existence of the ADS changes the nature of the FSS?

It is a 360 spherical projection of the view outside your ship.
That view is a rendering of the scan results of the FSS honk.
You have some controls to navigate the view.
You have a tuning feature with which to focus on specific body types.
You have a zoom function to scan tuned body types.

FSS usage:
Honk - Pan/Tune - Zoom - Scan

Given that you wouldn’t fit an ADS, what changes?
 
Last edited:
The tactics are the same, no? Drag discussion down to the level of pointless arguments about personal preferences and feelings, then bait people to discuss posters, and wait for when the moderators will lock it down. If that seems to take too long, somebody will pop in with some inappropriate gifs and/or politics, and bam, thread's locked.

Personally, I'd like to ask people to refrain from feeding the trolls. Nobody's opinions matter here, and there are always people who will either refuse to change their minds no matter what, or who will flip-flop for the sake of argument and attention. But if you want change, it's mostly Frontier's mind(s) you have to change, and not any single CMDR's.
Well, to be precise, it's management's mind. I wouldn't be surprised if some developers would rather revisit exploration and improve on it, but have to work on other things. Expansion in the works, after all.
Ah, Marx, coming in throwing around sensible points. That’s not the done thing round here you know.

But given some of the points you’re making what would probably be useful in aid to that would be if the issues people have could be summarised concisely, coherently and impartially, in a non-emotive way, so that they can be clearly understood without anyone getting antagonised.

Also, it’d be good if issues with having both old and new mechanisms could be explained so that those arguing for the return of the old ones could understand the consequences of what they’re asking for, and perhaps suggest possible mitigations, or make alternative proposals with less consequences.
 
lastly, the whining has been so annoying since the change that I don’t want the ads crowd to get a win. But that’s a more personal reason lol

Not like ARX was a wase of dev time.

But anyway at least you are being honest and you are not the only one to express this view. The bit where it starts to get unseemsly is that fdev is siding with people who basicly admit they are just trolling and spreading bad feeling. When the FSS first arrived i said at the time it looked like a nasty troll against explorers...All i see is a gang of bullies with fdev standing behind them. Its a terrible way for a company to behave.


How small of a group? I have 60-some ships, almost all with legacy engineered modules. During the beta I tested these modules and compared their starting values with maximum new-engineered values. Nearly all of them offered some degree of better functionality over updated versions, though I'd not call any of them "god-modded", just really good modules. Efficient beams with reduced power bonuses, weight reduction bonuses no longer available - things of that sort that render them better than contemporary counterparts, even when the base modifications proved to have higher values - and guess what, this wasn't something limited to just the first 1000 pilots, or just to those who dug deep in their pockets - the option was available to everyone who had engineered modules prior to the update. These Legacy Modules are OUR cobra 4's. Sorry if you came late to the party, all the Cristal is gone, but we still have plenty of Dom Perignon.

Well... i didnt call them god modded either. Not my fault if you think they are that powerful :) The fact that you have 60 ships worth just proves the point. Why is it ok for you to have that stuff but im not allowed to keep my old ADS? In the name of fair play those modules should have been stripped out just like the ADS was.
 
Last edited:
I had the same feeling with the ADS - just 5 years earlier. Now I'm curious about how you'll abide an unpleasant situation for the next 5 years. After that, we talk.

Well im going to tell everybody how i feel ike i got cheated and ripped off. While im playing something else.
 
There just isnt any reason not to let people have the ADS back. And if fdev is planning on making the FSS tie into other things, as funny as i would find that, i really wouldnt. It will just upset more people. Mistakes get made thats understandable but ignoring it afterwards is unforgivable and excluding people who cant accept it is even worse. Why does Fdev want to be another EA or sega? If i even see the name sega on something my wallet closes out of principal. Its not clever treating customers like this.
 
See, that's a big difference here between you and me. I did NOT stopped playing 5 years (if I did, I wouldn't still be here, another difference between us) and did NOT inform anyone and his dog of how frustrated I am. But what am I saying, move on...

Just the same as frontier is allowed to ignore me and not care about my issue, so i am entitled to share my opinion of that.

See whats happening as both sides dig in and there is no communication?
 
See, that's a big difference here between you and me. I did NOT stopped playing 5 years ago (if I did, I wouldn't still be here, another difference between us) and did NOT inform anyone and his dog of how frustrated I am. But what am I saying, move on...



Yes it is, I'll give you a short summary, that's all I can do for you. Your position is easy and basically boils down to "I want something back". My position would be to explain to you over and over again why this would massively hurt the game's consistency. At this point I usually get to hear "but the game is highly inconsistent anyway" at which point I can only agree but will REPEAT "the game needs much better consistency, not worse".

I'm certainly not going through the whole treadmill in every next ADS thread, thanks.

If you do not understand how the re-introduction of the ADS is against any means of consistency, I'm not the one to teach you the fundamentals of game design, that's your job. A little auto-didacting certainly can't hurt...

Funnily enough, that is close to what my job actually is.

So please, do explain what consistency is lost by having two scanners focused on different aspects of system discovery.
Maybe I’ll learn something useful to my job.
 
I have, elsewhere and more than once, just not ad nauseam. Are you reading at all what I'm saying? Doesn't seem so.
What exactly is your job? Just in case your comment is just based on another misunderstanding...

I’m certainly reading your recent posts and following up with questions.

You say there is an inconsistency, but I don’t see it.
Please enlighten me.

I’m the Documentation Manager for Bohemia Interactive Simulations.
We provide VBS, the military version of ArmA, to the friendly nations of the world.
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom