So you responded to my text about atmos with random jargon. Since you clearly didn't talk about atmos.
Star Citizen Discussion Thread v11
- Thread starter Sir.Tj
- Start date
-
- Tags
- star citizen
- Status
No. I responded to your text about atmos with the general reason why you'd choose not to implement something, even if it would be easy to do. So it was neither random, nor jargon.
Got ya but you were just saying it for no reason then or did you have anything in mind that this applies to. Tress grow thanks to sunlight, that is a general truth.
Nope. You were suggesting that some things should already be in place. I gave you the reasoning behind why they shouldn't.
So you did claim that there is no reason to implement atmos tech and that is adds nothing ?
So why did you respond to my atmos post with a random general truth that didn't apply to atmos tech ?
But if so then my response is cool tell me more.
Because it wasn't random and because it applies to the implementation of atmospheric travel.
Ohh god...... One last try you literally said in post above that it wasn't aimed at atmos tech. Now you are saying that you were, are you by any chance at a party drinking.
No. And definitely not “literally”.
Remember how I said that if you're going to argue against something I said, make sure it's actually something I said, not something you imagined…?
I'm just failing to understand why did you respond to me with random facts then that don't apply to atmos tech. Right but what ever I'm tired of talking with a wanna be lawyer, there is no discussing with you at all.
Because, as mentioned “it wasn't random and because it applies to the implementation of atmospheric travel.”
Or, if you like, since it applies to the implementation of atmospheric travel, it is not random.
Or, if you like [general implementation consideration] applies to [specific implementation].
Last edited:
So basically you are being a ass for no reason, because doesn't matter how I quote you point is the same. You claiming that atmos tech adds nothing and it should of been implemented.
Exactly we would have atmos in both games now
The atmos that you are talking about is not the atmos that FDev have talked about:
They’ve suggested ‘geographical’ cloud formations & perils. Cloud landscapes that lend themselves to mining hotspots. Ambitious stuff.
IE: Tech that brings gameplay.
The stuff you are talking about would not add that, or be a stepping stone to that.
Do you see why objecting to such ‘easy’ / non-stepping-stone additions is not the same as objecting outright to atmospherics? (Let alone the same as objecting to space flight, or on foot action, or any of the other bizarre examples you’ve thrown into the mix
)No. I'm offering you a reasoning why a developer might not want to implement a given feature, in spite of how easy it is to scrape together a quick demo, since the discussion started with a quick demo that led to a suggestion that something similar should be implemented.
It does indeed not matter how you try to quote me — at no point have I made any such claims. No amount of quoting me will suddenly make such a claim appear out of nowhere (unless you fake it, at which point it is obviously no longer a quote).
Last edited:
This CMDR understands funding developmentNonsense.
There's always SoftBank as both Uber and former WeWorks can attest to.
And the Saudis too with those ultra deep pockets in their Public Fund.
Basically, the global investment community in general. Which always has a ready supply of denizens with more money than common sense
You're literally daring to be logical in your thought process here. An admirable characteristic which btw, appeared to elude some of the biggest Vulture Capitalists in the financial world the likes of JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs and Masayoshi Son of Softbank infamy. The latter who appeared to redeem himself by stumbling across some of the minute sense God gave sheep. When he got #WOKE and fired his former CEO protegee at WeWorks two months ago.
WeWorks. Which like CI, has been locked in a mortal struggle to keep itself afloat. Despite laying of 20% of its global work force in fall of this year. Despite receiving several tens of BILLIONS in emergency cash flow injections from its investors in early 4Q 2019. Deep pocket investors who range from individuals (e.g. Masayoshi Son) to governments of entire COUNTRIES (e.g. Saudi Arabia considerably down from $60 billion 1st round investment).
As the catastrophic failure of WeWork (which never made its IPO) and Uber (which stock is sinking to the bottom of the Marianas Trench faster than a chicken with the Titantic tied to its drumstick) can attest, investors exist for one sole reason: to invest. And if their investment appears to be failing, they'll keep investing (out of fear of failure, coercion, desperation, or a combination of all these) if they believe this illogical action is the only way to protect their original investment.
Just like the faithful backers and unofficial investors of SC aka peasant $60 backers who only care about SQ42, those PU backers who're impulsive consumers with poor self control, those PU peasant backers desperate to maintain their social status by keeping up with their SC whale Jones peers, and true SC whales who -- just like Masayoshi Son-- possess far more money than common sense.
Anyhow, spot on about the demo. Real shame FDev can't hire this guy. For all the right reasons.
lol. now i'm doubting you ever played elite.
Exactly we would have atmos in both games now
Largrange clubs with electrical storms are in Elite and provide turbulence but beside being cool visas, especially in VR, they don't add much which is really the debate.
If the same effects were added to lifeless world's in ED would it really add that much?
To bring synergy to Tippis and Sovapid above, it could be added to ED but would additional gameplay it would just bring ire not praise.
As imagine if Gas Giant could be skimmed for fuel and new gas materials added for collection using the same tech as the Electrical Storms in Largrange clouds.
I am sure the forum would lable it a copy paste that adds nothing.
- Status