Not at all - not being supportive of some changes does not equate to opposing all changes - it rather depends on what the changes are (and different people have different ideas as to what constitutes a "good" or "bad" change proposal).
Difficult to examine the ramifications of a spitball compared to what could become patch notes.
Most of us have become attached to our engineered ships by now, it may cause a revolt if we have to tone them down: how about allowing the whole of the player base to have access to the engineers from New Era onward? You could just allow them to land on the engineer worlds and nowhere else ..
That’s what betas are for. Still, there’s so many variables in each piece of “identification” a system has (economy, population, security level, state, power play interaction) that giving each variable a tangible affect that interacts with the player or affects how the player interacts, would go a very long way to making the game more alive, increasing player agency, and make the bubble have dangerous areas, all in ways that benefit pve players and PvP players alike
Yes, I know, and I also agree that the engineerinf mods are too extreme, I was trying to be pragmatic for once
By the time it gets to Beta it's probably too late to fundamentally change (although variable tweaking may happen).
I agree, in principle of course. As ever, the devil's in the detail....
I get where you are coming from, but I think its gone beyond that point where multiple areas of the game suffer and to make a more solid future we have to embrace the pain now.I remember when Eagles used to show up in Sag A....
